list of thinks fix
1-stars wars
2-csi miami
3-rocky 4
4-field of dream
5-maybe all of disney movies except cinderella-peter pan-jumbo-snow white,pirates of caribean is trhue and also flipper
list of thinks fix
1-stars wars
2-csi miami
3-rocky 4
4-field of dream
5-maybe all of disney movies except cinderella-peter pan-jumbo-snow white,pirates of caribean is trhue and also flipper
list of thinks fix
1-stars wars
2-csi miami
3-rocky 4
4-field of dream
5-maybe all of disney movies except cinderella-peter pan-jumbo-snow white,pirates of caribean is trhue and also flipper
no one will ever know the answer to who ARE involved. However, whoever are involved are sure to have extra incentive in their pockets. Money silence all evidences!
As I say, it is complicated. Take sample last night Giants vs GB. Public money were heavy on GB and OVER.
all final wager entered into the system and the risk calculated as followed:
if single bet GB win payout = $500 mil
if single Giants win payout = $200 mil
if single Over win payout = $300 mil
if single Under win payout = $100 mil
if parlay GB+Over win payout = $400 mil
if parlay GB+Under win payout = $300 mil
if parlay Giants + Over win payout= $800 mil
if parlay Giant + Under win payout = $150 mil
.....From here the system can instinctly calculate the lowest risk payout and the outcome will come into play. Therefore, sometime you see 1 public win and 1 loss depending the lowest payout of all combined risks in their system.
no one will ever know the answer to who ARE involved. However, whoever are involved are sure to have extra incentive in their pockets. Money silence all evidences!
As I say, it is complicated. Take sample last night Giants vs GB. Public money were heavy on GB and OVER.
all final wager entered into the system and the risk calculated as followed:
if single bet GB win payout = $500 mil
if single Giants win payout = $200 mil
if single Over win payout = $300 mil
if single Under win payout = $100 mil
if parlay GB+Over win payout = $400 mil
if parlay GB+Under win payout = $300 mil
if parlay Giants + Over win payout= $800 mil
if parlay Giant + Under win payout = $150 mil
.....From here the system can instinctly calculate the lowest risk payout and the outcome will come into play. Therefore, sometime you see 1 public win and 1 loss depending the lowest payout of all combined risks in their system.
[Quote: Originally Posted by salsaboy27]
only if we have these figures somewhat accessible we can beat the system.
come on salsa !!!!!! you really think players of games (100 totals+coach etc....) knows that !!!!!!!! they dont care about that ,you really think players risk big injuries (concusion)lol you know your foot come on !!!! do you ever played ? me yes is not a single sport my friend !!!!
look game miami-seattles,do you think someone call wilson or tanehill and said''hé boy only 14 points and first half do points many peoples bets under !!!!!!,........? be serious ,find me player only one ,just one since 100 years who can confirm game is fixed ?
[Quote: Originally Posted by salsaboy27]
only if we have these figures somewhat accessible we can beat the system.
come on salsa !!!!!! you really think players of games (100 totals+coach etc....) knows that !!!!!!!! they dont care about that ,you really think players risk big injuries (concusion)lol you know your foot come on !!!! do you ever played ? me yes is not a single sport my friend !!!!
look game miami-seattles,do you think someone call wilson or tanehill and said''hé boy only 14 points and first half do points many peoples bets under !!!!!!,........? be serious ,find me player only one ,just one since 100 years who can confirm game is fixed ?
another secret that I will tell you is I actually got plus money on SF and the NYG game. I took SF -3 and NYG -3 both at +110 the reason behind these bets is simple, first its prime time game and action are both lopsided. Now "the authority" doesn't like to lose to teasers, and these two games has teasers written all over it. I know its going to be more than 7 points or more on the spread, although I almost doubted myself a few times when SF keep on missing the fieldgoals at the end, because I was afraid the Drew Brees can score a last minute TD drive to make my bet a push at -3. I shouldn't because the authority was very greedy.
Come on people, give me some feedback here, I am bored as hell and no one wants to bash me?lol,this one is good !!!!!!
pathetic !!!!!! you lost what ? your car ?housse ? wife ?which sport you played ? bingo !!!!! in pinacle teaser at 6,6.5,7,10 and 13 your crazy bigger than your doctor can think !!!!go in florida in dog race and bet on the rabbit you will win every time,your just a looser since 30 years who cry like a baby after each game you loose by 1 or 2 or 3 points who dont understand the game !!!!!!!......take care luke skywalker exist and santa clauss to.....
another secret that I will tell you is I actually got plus money on SF and the NYG game. I took SF -3 and NYG -3 both at +110 the reason behind these bets is simple, first its prime time game and action are both lopsided. Now "the authority" doesn't like to lose to teasers, and these two games has teasers written all over it. I know its going to be more than 7 points or more on the spread, although I almost doubted myself a few times when SF keep on missing the fieldgoals at the end, because I was afraid the Drew Brees can score a last minute TD drive to make my bet a push at -3. I shouldn't because the authority was very greedy.
Come on people, give me some feedback here, I am bored as hell and no one wants to bash me?lol,this one is good !!!!!!
pathetic !!!!!! you lost what ? your car ?housse ? wife ?which sport you played ? bingo !!!!! in pinacle teaser at 6,6.5,7,10 and 13 your crazy bigger than your doctor can think !!!!go in florida in dog race and bet on the rabbit you will win every time,your just a looser since 30 years who cry like a baby after each game you loose by 1 or 2 or 3 points who dont understand the game !!!!!!!......take care luke skywalker exist and santa clauss to.....
bunny651
have you ever play Baccarat? I saw him at the Casino one time and he stood there for over an before he made a bet. He won that hand, because there's a pattern in Baccarat, just like there's a pattern in the NFL.
Yes and that's what the casinos want people to believe, too. As a matter of fact, the casinos provide the so-called "patterns" to players now through the small flatscreen by the table. Do you think they would do that if they think it provides any kind of advantages to the players?
The game is been around for a long time. ANY type of preceived advantages had been thoroughly tested out by both sides. Mathematically, each hand is independent. Some might argue the cards already out would affect the later hands but 1) they don't use the whole shoe, 2) you can't predict the sequence.
Finally, you are comparing apples with oranges in terms of NFL games and a table game. Why? It's because there's a line in NFL and the line deals with reality as well as perception while in a table game, it's HARD stats ONLY.
bunny651
have you ever play Baccarat? I saw him at the Casino one time and he stood there for over an before he made a bet. He won that hand, because there's a pattern in Baccarat, just like there's a pattern in the NFL.
Yes and that's what the casinos want people to believe, too. As a matter of fact, the casinos provide the so-called "patterns" to players now through the small flatscreen by the table. Do you think they would do that if they think it provides any kind of advantages to the players?
The game is been around for a long time. ANY type of preceived advantages had been thoroughly tested out by both sides. Mathematically, each hand is independent. Some might argue the cards already out would affect the later hands but 1) they don't use the whole shoe, 2) you can't predict the sequence.
Finally, you are comparing apples with oranges in terms of NFL games and a table game. Why? It's because there's a line in NFL and the line deals with reality as well as perception while in a table game, it's HARD stats ONLY.
In the 100th Grey Cup Final game in the Canadian Football League played last Sunday in Toronto between the Toronto Argonauts and the visiting western champs the Calgary Stampeders the total opened at 54.5 and as the week grew old it moved slowly upwards 55, 55.5 and finally to 56.
With the -1.5pt home dog Toronto Argonauts holding a 35-15 lead late into garbage time, the Calgary Stampeders did the ole giddy up and get one to make the score look a bit more respectable for the history books or?...did a call come from way above for them to do that and then do something that made NO SENSE AT ALL.
Instead of kicking for the point after Calgary's coaching staff experienced what might best be described as a "brain fart" and for some unknown reason ran a play to get two points instead of simply kicking for the point after.The announcers on the radio were perplexed by the event, but most of us listening or watching with a bet on the total KNEW exactly why Calgary went for two points over the easy one via kicking despite that result contributing in no way to increasing the amount of doughnuts in their oven.The fat lady had already sung her song and scoring that two point play instead of simply kicking for ONE EXTRA POINT was WRONG. final Toronto 35 Calgary 22 and voila!! 57 points.
Fixed or not that was something to think about. I was going to play the total under all week and waited for the number to climb, but in the end I held off for some reason..
Regards .
In the 100th Grey Cup Final game in the Canadian Football League played last Sunday in Toronto between the Toronto Argonauts and the visiting western champs the Calgary Stampeders the total opened at 54.5 and as the week grew old it moved slowly upwards 55, 55.5 and finally to 56.
With the -1.5pt home dog Toronto Argonauts holding a 35-15 lead late into garbage time, the Calgary Stampeders did the ole giddy up and get one to make the score look a bit more respectable for the history books or?...did a call come from way above for them to do that and then do something that made NO SENSE AT ALL.
Instead of kicking for the point after Calgary's coaching staff experienced what might best be described as a "brain fart" and for some unknown reason ran a play to get two points instead of simply kicking for the point after.The announcers on the radio were perplexed by the event, but most of us listening or watching with a bet on the total KNEW exactly why Calgary went for two points over the easy one via kicking despite that result contributing in no way to increasing the amount of doughnuts in their oven.The fat lady had already sung her song and scoring that two point play instead of simply kicking for ONE EXTRA POINT was WRONG. final Toronto 35 Calgary 22 and voila!! 57 points.
Fixed or not that was something to think about. I was going to play the total under all week and waited for the number to climb, but in the end I held off for some reason..
Regards .
In the 100th Grey Cup Final game in the Canadian Football League played last Sunday in Toronto between the Toronto Argonauts and the visiting western champs the Calgary Stampeders the total opened at 54.5 and as the week grew old it moved slowly upwards 55, 55.5 and finally to 56.
With the -1.5pt home dog Toronto Argonauts holding a 35-15 lead late into garbage time, the Calgary Stampeders did the ole giddy up and get one to make the score look a bit more respectable for the history books or?...did a call come from way above for them to do that and then do something that made NO SENSE AT ALL.
Instead of kicking for the point after Calgary's coaching staff experienced what might best be described as a "brain fart" and for some unknown reason ran a play to get two points instead of simply kicking for the point after.The announcers on the radio were perplexed by the event, but most of us listening or watching with a bet on the total KNEW exactly why Calgary went for two points over the easy one via kicking despite that result contributing in no way to increasing the amount of doughnuts in their oven.The fat lady had already sung her song and scoring that two point play instead of simply kicking for ONE EXTRA POINT was WRONG. final Toronto 35 Calgary 22 and voila!! 57 points.
Fixed or not that was something to think about. I was going to play the total under all week and waited for the number to climb, but in the end I held off for some reason..
Regards .
In the 100th Grey Cup Final game in the Canadian Football League played last Sunday in Toronto between the Toronto Argonauts and the visiting western champs the Calgary Stampeders the total opened at 54.5 and as the week grew old it moved slowly upwards 55, 55.5 and finally to 56.
With the -1.5pt home dog Toronto Argonauts holding a 35-15 lead late into garbage time, the Calgary Stampeders did the ole giddy up and get one to make the score look a bit more respectable for the history books or?...did a call come from way above for them to do that and then do something that made NO SENSE AT ALL.
Instead of kicking for the point after Calgary's coaching staff experienced what might best be described as a "brain fart" and for some unknown reason ran a play to get two points instead of simply kicking for the point after.The announcers on the radio were perplexed by the event, but most of us listening or watching with a bet on the total KNEW exactly why Calgary went for two points over the easy one via kicking despite that result contributing in no way to increasing the amount of doughnuts in their oven.The fat lady had already sung her song and scoring that two point play instead of simply kicking for ONE EXTRA POINT was WRONG. final Toronto 35 Calgary 22 and voila!! 57 points.
Fixed or not that was something to think about. I was going to play the total under all week and waited for the number to climb, but in the end I held off for some reason..
Regards .
How many times you gonna tell us about this one scenario. Funny werent you guys saying Philly and the under was the call last night. I rest my case. Your an idiot.
How many times you gonna tell us about this one scenario. Funny werent you guys saying Philly and the under was the call last night. I rest my case. Your an idiot.
in response to Bumblebee
I think AR was part of it on Sundaynight. He came out in the second half looking very comptent and Green Bay srtated to run instead of throwing the ball, some of the fix that I have seen previously was the losing team going for the fourth down and not getting resulting in turn over of downs, However, in our case its the Giants going for the fourth down. If you think this over/under wasn't fixed you are an idiot.
in response to Bumblebee
I think AR was part of it on Sundaynight. He came out in the second half looking very comptent and Green Bay srtated to run instead of throwing the ball, some of the fix that I have seen previously was the losing team going for the fourth down and not getting resulting in turn over of downs, However, in our case its the Giants going for the fourth down. If you think this over/under wasn't fixed you are an idiot.
How many times you gonna tell us about this one scenario. Funny werent you guys saying Philly and the under was the call last night. I rest my case. Your an idiot.
How many times you gonna tell us about this one scenario. Funny werent you guys saying Philly and the under was the call last night. I rest my case. Your an idiot.
in response to Bumblebee
I think AR was part of it on Sundaynight. He came out in the second half looking very comptent and Green Bay srtated to run instead of throwing the ball, some of the fix that I have seen previously was the losing team going for the fourth down and not getting resulting in turn over of downs, However, in our case its the Giants going for the fourth down. If you think this over/under wasn't fixed you are an idiot.
in response to Bumblebee
I think AR was part of it on Sundaynight. He came out in the second half looking very comptent and Green Bay srtated to run instead of throwing the ball, some of the fix that I have seen previously was the losing team going for the fourth down and not getting resulting in turn over of downs, However, in our case its the Giants going for the fourth down. If you think this over/under wasn't fixed you are an idiot.
I do have to agree with skyace173
only a small percentage of NFL games are fixed, and the over/under on Sunday night was definately one of them. If you are a bettor on the NFL, trying to spot the fix all the time will not be profitable. Its very simple, you will never know which game is going to get fixed. The reason is because you don't know the final dollar amount, only the people fixing the games knows. Because so many people think alike and place wager accordingly, making the final figue hard to know for sure. If the figure comes in 60/40 then I don't think it will be tampered with. That's my observation throught out the years.
I do have to agree with skyace173
only a small percentage of NFL games are fixed, and the over/under on Sunday night was definately one of them. If you are a bettor on the NFL, trying to spot the fix all the time will not be profitable. Its very simple, you will never know which game is going to get fixed. The reason is because you don't know the final dollar amount, only the people fixing the games knows. Because so many people think alike and place wager accordingly, making the final figue hard to know for sure. If the figure comes in 60/40 then I don't think it will be tampered with. That's my observation throught out the years.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.