Eagles winning was good outcome for the book as well as Saquon and Kelce going under their prop line and no TD scorer. The Under hitting would have been the perfect storm but the books didn't have their way with that. I'm predicting they'll take in a bit more money than last year's Super Bowl. Maybe the margin will barely hit 8 figures. They'll probably post the hold on Tuesday or wednesday
Credit to Todd Dewey of the RJ
Sip on that plus money honey!
2
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Eagles winning was good outcome for the book as well as Saquon and Kelce going under their prop line and no TD scorer. The Under hitting would have been the perfect storm but the books didn't have their way with that. I'm predicting they'll take in a bit more money than last year's Super Bowl. Maybe the margin will barely hit 8 figures. They'll probably post the hold on Tuesday or wednesday
Geeesh, had a write up just been busted out, not sure what has happened... Anyways, waiting for the numgers released from the NV Gaming Control Board. It should come out soon.
Covers has done that to me on more than a few occasions I feel your pain lol
Sip on that plus money honey!
1
Quote Originally Posted by Europa:
Geeesh, had a write up just been busted out, not sure what has happened... Anyways, waiting for the numgers released from the NV Gaming Control Board. It should come out soon.
Covers has done that to me on more than a few occasions I feel your pain lol
Same here. I've learned my lesson. I always copy it before I submit it. In case it didn't go through, I have it ready to paste and try again. I suggest you fellas do the same.
1
@Digitalkarma
Same here. I've learned my lesson. I always copy it before I submit it. In case it didn't go through, I have it ready to paste and try again. I suggest you fellas do the same.
I thought the books need KC; both Sportsbook Spy (SS) and ESPN Bet Live had PHL taking the most action.
I checked SS just now. They show PHL had 56% of the cash and 58% of the tickets. Of course the books collected a ton of money on all of the Super Bowl futures wagers on the 31 other teams.
SS also shows this breakdown on the Over - 70% of the cash and 74% of the tickets.
It's nice to see the public have a winning Super Bowl, and most non-bettors prefer an exciting, high-scoring game. They were happy, too.
0
Thanks for posting, DK.
I thought the books need KC; both Sportsbook Spy (SS) and ESPN Bet Live had PHL taking the most action.
I checked SS just now. They show PHL had 56% of the cash and 58% of the tickets. Of course the books collected a ton of money on all of the Super Bowl futures wagers on the 31 other teams.
SS also shows this breakdown on the Over - 70% of the cash and 74% of the tickets.
It's nice to see the public have a winning Super Bowl, and most non-bettors prefer an exciting, high-scoring game. They were happy, too.
@Digitalkarma Same here. I've learned my lesson. I always copy it before I submit it. In case it didn't go through, I have it ready to paste and try again. I suggest you fellas do the same.
When I'm doing a write up I probably copy the text every 10 minutes or start another paragraph, put it in a notepad temporarily if I have to lol. Yup you know it well
Sip on that plus money honey!
1
Quote Originally Posted by justliketoplay:
@Digitalkarma Same here. I've learned my lesson. I always copy it before I submit it. In case it didn't go through, I have it ready to paste and try again. I suggest you fellas do the same.
When I'm doing a write up I probably copy the text every 10 minutes or start another paragraph, put it in a notepad temporarily if I have to lol. Yup you know it well
Thanks for posting, DK. I thought the books need KC; both Sportsbook Spy (SS) and ESPN Bet Live had PHL taking the most action. I checked SS just now. They show PHL had 56% of the cash and 58% of the tickets. Of course the books collected a ton of money on all of the Super Bowl futures wagers on the 31 other teams. SS also shows this breakdown on the Over - 70% of the cash and 74% of the tickets. It's nice to see the public have a winning Super Bowl, and most non-bettors prefer an exciting, high-scoring game. They were happy, too.
I don't trust these consensus sites. I was at the casino watching some of the action and it felt like 60% to 40 in favor of Chiefs judging by the crowd reaction. And also when I hear sportsbooks say we got liability on this team so we rooting for so and so team when they really mean the opposite lol.
Looks like Over bettors were happy as long as they didn't parlay it with the Chiefs
Sip on that plus money honey!
0
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:
Thanks for posting, DK. I thought the books need KC; both Sportsbook Spy (SS) and ESPN Bet Live had PHL taking the most action. I checked SS just now. They show PHL had 56% of the cash and 58% of the tickets. Of course the books collected a ton of money on all of the Super Bowl futures wagers on the 31 other teams. SS also shows this breakdown on the Over - 70% of the cash and 74% of the tickets. It's nice to see the public have a winning Super Bowl, and most non-bettors prefer an exciting, high-scoring game. They were happy, too.
I don't trust these consensus sites. I was at the casino watching some of the action and it felt like 60% to 40 in favor of Chiefs judging by the crowd reaction. And also when I hear sportsbooks say we got liability on this team so we rooting for so and so team when they really mean the opposite lol.
Looks like Over bettors were happy as long as they didn't parlay it with the Chiefs
Betmgm reports one of the best single game results in history.
Saw that tweet. I'm a little bit skeptical coming from them but I guess that makes up for last year where they said they got destroyed. Nice comeback MGM
Sip on that plus money honey!
0
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
Betmgm reports one of the best single game results in history.
Saw that tweet. I'm a little bit skeptical coming from them but I guess that makes up for last year where they said they got destroyed. Nice comeback MGM
Super Bowl 2025 Betting Recap: 'Philly winning in a blowout is what we needed'--FoxSports
Interestingly, BetMGM scores big in in-game from huge KC ML bets which obviously failed in the end. Although Over the total hurts books, however Eagles' rout over Chiefs is what Strip needed.
We get some excellent reporting by Patrick Everson, a renowned sports betting expert in Las Vegas.
0
Super Bowl 2025 Betting Recap: 'Philly winning in a blowout is what we needed'--FoxSports
Interestingly, BetMGM scores big in in-game from huge KC ML bets which obviously failed in the end. Although Over the total hurts books, however Eagles' rout over Chiefs is what Strip needed.
We get some excellent reporting by Patrick Everson, a renowned sports betting expert in Las Vegas.
Super Bowl 2025 Betting Recap: 'Philly winning in a blowout is what we needed'--FoxSports Interestingly, BetMGM scores big in in-game from huge KC ML bets which obviously failed in the end. Although Over the total hurts books, however Eagles' rout over Chiefs is what Strip needed. We get some excellent reporting by Patrick Everson, a renowned sports betting expert in Las Vegas.
I expected that since KC has come from behind so frequently.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Europa:
Super Bowl 2025 Betting Recap: 'Philly winning in a blowout is what we needed'--FoxSports Interestingly, BetMGM scores big in in-game from huge KC ML bets which obviously failed in the end. Although Over the total hurts books, however Eagles' rout over Chiefs is what Strip needed. We get some excellent reporting by Patrick Everson, a renowned sports betting expert in Las Vegas.
I expected that since KC has come from behind so frequently.
Wow, I knew it would be in the 8 figures but that's more than I expected. It's an all time record now. Imagine how much more if the game had stayed Under
Wow, I knew it would be in the 8 figures but that's more than I expected. It's an all time record now. Imagine how much more if the game had stayed Under
I suspect so too , the last few Super Bowl's have been some of the least profitable due to the KC comebacks and the Overs hitting and some crazy longshot props hitting on the KC side . Mahomes losing was good for the books
Sip on that plus money honey!
0
@Europa
@DogbiteWilliams
I suspect so too , the last few Super Bowl's have been some of the least profitable due to the KC comebacks and the Overs hitting and some crazy longshot props hitting on the KC side . Mahomes losing was good for the books
"The Eagles, who closed as 1.5-point underdogs, beat the Chiefs 40-22 on Sunday. Betting on the game's outcome was relatively balanced between the Eagles and Chiefs, but sportsbooks cleaned up on player props, most notably Philadelphia running back Saquon Barkley not scoring a touchdown."
KC coughed up an embarrassing 40 points, but their DEF was just good enough to help the Nevada sportsbooks.
0
From DK's link in Comment #15:
"The Eagles, who closed as 1.5-point underdogs, beat the Chiefs 40-22 on Sunday. Betting on the game's outcome was relatively balanced between the Eagles and Chiefs, but sportsbooks cleaned up on player props, most notably Philadelphia running back Saquon Barkley not scoring a touchdown."
KC coughed up an embarrassing 40 points, but their DEF was just good enough to help the Nevada sportsbooks.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
