Pretty sure that was simultaneous possession.....

Question

I think by rule the refs actually got that right.&#xD;&#xA;But so ridiculous.  Just silly ending.

vanzack · Answer

I think by rule the refs actually got that right.&#xD;&#xA;But so ridiculous.  Just silly ending.

cambyspree99 · Answer

If this doesnt make the nfl see what a joke this is this season is going down the drain!!!

vanzack · Answer

This is the game that brings the real refs back.&#xD;&#xA;Can you imagine Ed Hocculi at home right now?  He just popped a bottle of Crystal.

sungod95 · Answer

STFU

Iveycheats · Answer

It is SOOOOO silly that the two refs there disagreed....but I agree Van.....simultaneous poss is supposed to go to the Offensive player

FadeOnly · Answer

I disagree.  Defender clearly had the ball pressed to his chest.What about the extra point?

cambyspree99 · Answer

disgraceful

DickyR · Answer

Vanzack

Iveycheats · Answer

they both had it.....but Packers player had it "more"?????....does that matter?

mightiestmojo · Answer

I think you&#x27;re wrong. I didn&#x27;t even lose money but that was a GB interception easy peasy. But yes, real refs got a gift.

THEMUGG · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by vanzack]  This is the game that brings the real refs back.&#xD;&#xA;Can you imagine Ed Hocculi at home right now?  He just popped a bottle of Crystal.  [/Quote] For sure.........this whole game was a debacle...............somewhere in between there was some good football but holy shit

vanzack · Answer

I know the defender had MORE of the ball.&#xD;&#xA;But the rule is simultaneous possession goes to the offense - and I think it was simultaneous possession.

Iveycheats · Answer

wow, Golden Tate pushed the shit out of that guy

jmello1 · Answer

I didnt bet the game but the Jennings definitely should have been awarded the pick.. No simultaneous possession there

vanzack · Answer

Ivey - yes - he had MORE of the ball....&#xD;&#xA;Agree....

mightiestmojo · Answer

Should haved knocked it away. Like it&#x27;s coached that would have solved it.

Bling · Answer

I agree with you Van, but that was not simultaneous possession and that was evident in replay.

Football-Dude · Answer

Seattle player had one hand on the ball.  How is that simultaneous possession?

ClubDirt · Answer

looked like a clear catch by jennings with tate having a hand on the ball.

mightiestmojo · Answer

I&#x27;d be ashamed to win like that. Carroll has some balls acting like it was a great play and saying how they executed.

wizardofroz · Answer

Not only did these scabs miss offensive interference with the push in the back, but this was NOT simultaneous possession, so the call was HORRENDOUS.

HutchEmAll · Answer

I realize they give liberties to the WR&#x27;s at the end of a game, but that was a penalty that needed to be called IMO.  Crazy.

vanzack · Answer

That push on the defender by Tate is so funny.

Day-trader1 · Answer

I had sea hags. I&#x27;m still wondering why he didn&#x27;t kick the fg with 4:30 left. This shit is whack but ill take the win. Loooool

onTHEfritz · Answer

Exactly, just because Tate can put his hands on the ball doesn&#x27;t mean he had possession

Pretty sure that was simultaneous possession.....

Hot Forum Topics