You think the Packers winning that Super Bowl was not because they had a stacked line-up including one of the greatest QBs of all-time and one of the greatest and physically dominant defensive players of all-time against an overmatched Patriots team but because Brett Favre's brother killed his friend in a DUI crash? His brother? Got ya.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
@chic-cardinals
You think the Packers winning that Super Bowl was not because they had a stacked line-up including one of the greatest QBs of all-time and one of the greatest and physically dominant defensive players of all-time against an overmatched Patriots team but because Brett Favre's brother killed his friend in a DUI crash? His brother? Got ya.
The Chiefs lost that game because their O-line was decimated, and their defense has always been suspect at best in the Andy Reid era. Not because of Andy Reid's kid. They were missing both tackles. I wonder what the historic win% is for a team missing both starting tackles.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
@begginerboy
The Chiefs lost that game because their O-line was decimated, and their defense has always been suspect at best in the Andy Reid era. Not because of Andy Reid's kid. They were missing both tackles. I wonder what the historic win% is for a team missing both starting tackles.
@begginerboy The Chiefs lost that game because their O-line was decimated, and their defense has always been suspect at best in the Andy Reid era. Not because of Andy Reid's kid. They were missing both tackles. I wonder what the historic win% is for a team missing both starting tackles.
Shows you nothing about money and power
You're describing the script, the narrative. Not the actual reason why or how
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
@begginerboy The Chiefs lost that game because their O-line was decimated, and their defense has always been suspect at best in the Andy Reid era. Not because of Andy Reid's kid. They were missing both tackles. I wonder what the historic win% is for a team missing both starting tackles.
Shows you nothing about money and power
You're describing the script, the narrative. Not the actual reason why or how
@StumpTownStu chic will spin anything around to fit the narrative he wants to spin to the masses BB makes this thread and keeps telling others good luck with their Raiders bets, but is too much of a coward to put any real money on LAC
What am I spinning. I'm pointing directly at a fact/ truth. It's repeated itself multiple times.
0
Quote Originally Posted by carl42:
@StumpTownStu chic will spin anything around to fit the narrative he wants to spin to the masses BB makes this thread and keeps telling others good luck with their Raiders bets, but is too much of a coward to put any real money on LAC
What am I spinning. I'm pointing directly at a fact/ truth. It's repeated itself multiple times.
It has nothing to do with..Just like the DUI has nothing to do with anything..Now Move along....Just say you were wrong about KC in the SB..plain and simple....The excuses you come up with is asinine...Too much Pride...
Mayweather bet 450000 on
0
@begginerboy
It has nothing to do with..Just like the DUI has nothing to do with anything..Now Move along....Just say you were wrong about KC in the SB..plain and simple....The excuses you come up with is asinine...Too much Pride...
@chic-cardinals Please start posting all your picks. You seem to think you have it all figured out and we’re all blind. We’ll all get rich together.
Didn't I just tell you what I thought? Can you read? I don't deal in micro..I don't claim to know every outcome. I simply know what the real clues are. Stats are good clues but still secondary
I said Raiders over Colts.
0
Quote Originally Posted by YardiMatt:
@chic-cardinals Please start posting all your picks. You seem to think you have it all figured out and we’re all blind. We’ll all get rich together.
Didn't I just tell you what I thought? Can you read? I don't deal in micro..I don't claim to know every outcome. I simply know what the real clues are. Stats are good clues but still secondary
Quote Originally Posted by YardiMatt: @chic-cardinals Please start posting all your picks. You seem to think you have it all figured out and we’re all blind. We’ll all get rich together. Didn't I just tell you what I thought? Can you read? I don't deal in micro..I don't claim to know every outcome. I simply know what the real clues are. Stats are good clues but still secondary I said Raiders over Colts.
Can you read? Keep posting picks. There are plenty of games coming up for you to figure out the script and we can prosper together. Last week’s Raider ML pick won’t help us going forward.
0
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Quote Originally Posted by YardiMatt: @chic-cardinals Please start posting all your picks. You seem to think you have it all figured out and we’re all blind. We’ll all get rich together. Didn't I just tell you what I thought? Can you read? I don't deal in micro..I don't claim to know every outcome. I simply know what the real clues are. Stats are good clues but still secondary I said Raiders over Colts.
Can you read? Keep posting picks. There are plenty of games coming up for you to figure out the script and we can prosper together. Last week’s Raider ML pick won’t help us going forward.
Although it would be tough to eat a pastrami sandwich with ketchup. However putting mustard on my fries isn’t appealing, nor is mayo on my hot dog. Tough decision on a great question
bigreds daddy
0
@Hugh_Jorgan
Although it would be tough to eat a pastrami sandwich with ketchup. However putting mustard on my fries isn’t appealing, nor is mayo on my hot dog. Tough decision on a great question
don't bet chargers this is about gruden. If they make the playoffs you can't bet they will mention how gruden couldn't do it. A dui where no one got hurt does not offset the death of madden in the nfls eyes.
0
@begginerboy
don't bet chargers this is about gruden. If they make the playoffs you can't bet they will mention how gruden couldn't do it. A dui where no one got hurt does not offset the death of madden in the nfls eyes.
Yeah it is a conundrum. We're well trained to believe that this goes with that food wise. At the end of the day I think for both health and versatility I could make a stone ground champagne mustard work more often than not.
0
@Hugh_Jorgan
Yeah it is a conundrum. We're well trained to believe that this goes with that food wise. At the end of the day I think for both health and versatility I could make a stone ground champagne mustard work more often than not.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.