That was impressive by Carr right there. We got a ballgame.
@Digitalkarma
just cant see the raiders keeping up with the bengals...but the raiders have hung tough last six weeks or so....all to play for....not sure where any more money woluld be going...maybe derek carr interception...few games go by without one...
@Digitalkarma
just cant see the raiders keeping up with the bengals...but the raiders have hung tough last six weeks or so....all to play for....not sure where any more money woluld be going...maybe derek carr interception...few games go by without one...
Yep it was about as bad a half as they could've had..... and yet only down one score.
Second half things probably turn around for them.
Yep it was about as bad a half as they could've had..... and yet only down one score.
Second half things probably turn around for them.
The Whistle did not blow until the ball was entering the rec. hands in the endzone....the Raiders gave up long before the Whistle sounded.
The Whistle did not blow until the ball was entering the rec. hands in the endzone....the Raiders gave up long before the Whistle sounded.
live line went as high as -16 for Cincy to -7.5. Raiders backers we're very much in this. We need a stop, turnover or Cincy FG this first drive to keep it close.
live line went as high as -16 for Cincy to -7.5. Raiders backers we're very much in this. We need a stop, turnover or Cincy FG this first drive to keep it close.
How many people in this thread are on the Raiders and on the Bengals FG? That tell you who to take or should not take 2H!
LOL
How many people in this thread are on the Raiders and on the Bengals FG? That tell you who to take or should not take 2H!
LOL
To obtain a maximal whistle, subjects (27 healthy volunteers and 10 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) were asked to perform a short, sharp blow as hard as possible, from total lung capacity, through a reversed paediatric inhaler whistle, connected to a flange-type mouthpiece.
In both healthy subjects and patients, whistle mouth pressure (P) was closely related to the pressure measured in the oesophagus and stomach during the same manoeuvre. In healthy subjects, P and P correlated with wide limits of agreement, although P values were significantly higher than P (131±31 cmHO versus 101±27 cmHO, p<0.0001). In patients, it was also found that P and P values were strongly related (r=0.937, p<0.0001). In healthy subjects, the intraclass correlation coefficient and the variation coefficient for P repeated measurements were respectively 0.88 and 7.0%. However P and P were always smaller than the gastric pressure generated by a maximal cough.
Just trying to figure out why that ref blew the whistle for no reason. Can you decipher "13" from the above science?
Thanks in advance
To obtain a maximal whistle, subjects (27 healthy volunteers and 10 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) were asked to perform a short, sharp blow as hard as possible, from total lung capacity, through a reversed paediatric inhaler whistle, connected to a flange-type mouthpiece.
In both healthy subjects and patients, whistle mouth pressure (P) was closely related to the pressure measured in the oesophagus and stomach during the same manoeuvre. In healthy subjects, P and P correlated with wide limits of agreement, although P values were significantly higher than P (131±31 cmHO versus 101±27 cmHO, p<0.0001). In patients, it was also found that P and P values were strongly related (r=0.937, p<0.0001). In healthy subjects, the intraclass correlation coefficient and the variation coefficient for P repeated measurements were respectively 0.88 and 7.0%. However P and P were always smaller than the gastric pressure generated by a maximal cough.
Just trying to figure out why that ref blew the whistle for no reason. Can you decipher "13" from the above science?
Thanks in advance
@Digitalkarma
gotta play both sides...ive a 500/1 outright ticket on the raiders which i chose not to get some money back on...my haemies are killing me and my adulty pads are soaking.....
@Digitalkarma
gotta play both sides...ive a 500/1 outright ticket on the raiders which i chose not to get some money back on...my haemies are killing me and my adulty pads are soaking.....
1+3+2+0 = 6
LMAO
1+3+2+0 = 6
LMAO
Serious question…. How can anyone bet an under? Like I understand that bet hits many times for many games but how can you watch a game and hope both teams don’t score?
personally I’d bet overs or nothing at all as far as totals are concerned.
example A… this game. If you bet an under for first half you were literally clenching your ass cheeks hoping no scores happen and boom… you lose.
Anyway, no hate, just an honest question. Best of luck to all.
Serious question…. How can anyone bet an under? Like I understand that bet hits many times for many games but how can you watch a game and hope both teams don’t score?
personally I’d bet overs or nothing at all as far as totals are concerned.
example A… this game. If you bet an under for first half you were literally clenching your ass cheeks hoping no scores happen and boom… you lose.
Anyway, no hate, just an honest question. Best of luck to all.
@sgrogan6
Under bet are more suicidal than most its a bet that can lose at any time in a game and is always running (overs you can win in a quarter)...depends if you like defence or offence...
@sgrogan6
Under bet are more suicidal than most its a bet that can lose at any time in a game and is always running (overs you can win in a quarter)...depends if you like defence or offence...
Raiders could keep it interesting in the second half. Those who got it at +6 aren't looking awful...yet. Shout out to over backers things are looking great so far . Also those who bet on kickers congrats to you guys also.BOL 2nd half fellas.
Raiders could keep it interesting in the second half. Those who got it at +6 aren't looking awful...yet. Shout out to over backers things are looking great so far . Also those who bet on kickers congrats to you guys also.BOL 2nd half fellas.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.