You will do better fading in-season trends and playing a bottom 5 team in any category as a dog if that team is off a loss, and fading a top five team off a win if they are the favorite in Sunday day games. Best to wait six games before starting your fade.
Monday night especially, and to a lesser extent Thursday night games, in-season trends tend to play out as the trend would say they should.
1
You will do better fading in-season trends and playing a bottom 5 team in any category as a dog if that team is off a loss, and fading a top five team off a win if they are the favorite in Sunday day games. Best to wait six games before starting your fade.
Monday night especially, and to a lesser extent Thursday night games, in-season trends tend to play out as the trend would say they should.
You will do better fading in-season trends and playing on the bottom 5 team in any category as a dog if that team is off a loss, and fading a top five team off a win if they are the favorite in Sunday day games. Best to wait six games before starting your fade. Monday night especially, and to a lesser extent Thursday night games, in-season trends tend to play out as the trend would say they should.
Thx Sir:
Can you share how to query.
I understand:
p:w and pp:W and ppp:W (for 3 game ats results)
but to do the same for over or under : p:? and pp:? and ppp:?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
You will do better fading in-season trends and playing on the bottom 5 team in any category as a dog if that team is off a loss, and fading a top five team off a win if they are the favorite in Sunday day games. Best to wait six games before starting your fade. Monday night especially, and to a lesser extent Thursday night games, in-season trends tend to play out as the trend would say they should.
Thx Sir:
Can you share how to query.
I understand:
p:w and pp:W and ppp:W (for 3 game ats results)
but to do the same for over or under : p:? and pp:? and ppp:?
@jowchoo Pressure rates and other sack predictors are at the top of what I track. Amazingly, the team that statistically should win the sack and pressure battles are only covering at about 30%! This is what is driving me absolutely bonkers this season.
I have always been a line of scrimmage kind of guy. Never see a LOS power rating anywhere,so I continue research this idea. Sacks, qb hits, red zone efficiency and rushing differentials properly combined should put a handicapper in good shape. Win the line of scrimmage and turnover battle and have a competent coaching staff
will get you the money.............................gl going forward
0
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
@jowchoo Pressure rates and other sack predictors are at the top of what I track. Amazingly, the team that statistically should win the sack and pressure battles are only covering at about 30%! This is what is driving me absolutely bonkers this season.
I have always been a line of scrimmage kind of guy. Never see a LOS power rating anywhere,so I continue research this idea. Sacks, qb hits, red zone efficiency and rushing differentials properly combined should put a handicapper in good shape. Win the line of scrimmage and turnover battle and have a competent coaching staff
will get you the money.............................gl going forward
Quote Originally Posted by GamzOver: You're not Thailand. I've traced your internet address. You are living on my block Really,why is there a bamboo jungle right outside my house?
Oh yeah, jowchoo is a thai name given me by the villagers.
It means playboy....;-)
3
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
Quote Originally Posted by GamzOver: You're not Thailand. I've traced your internet address. You are living on my block Really,why is there a bamboo jungle right outside my house?
Oh yeah, jowchoo is a thai name given me by the villagers.
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: Quote Originally Posted by GamzOver: You're not Thailand. I've traced your internet address. You are living on my block Really,why is there a bamboo jungle right outside my house? Oh yeah, jowchoo is a thai name given me by the villagers. It means playboy....;-)
Hi there. Mr. Playboy.
I'm here in North-East.
Have we had a chance to meet . Anyway I like some of yr system. Good luck week.
1
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: Quote Originally Posted by GamzOver: You're not Thailand. I've traced your internet address. You are living on my block Really,why is there a bamboo jungle right outside my house? Oh yeah, jowchoo is a thai name given me by the villagers. It means playboy....;-)
Hi there. Mr. Playboy.
I'm here in North-East.
Have we had a chance to meet . Anyway I like some of yr system. Good luck week.
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: @jowchoo Pressure rates and other sack predictors are at the top of what I track. Amazingly, the team that statistically should win the sack and pressure battles are only covering at about 30%! This is what is driving me absolutely bonkers this season. I have always been a line of scrimmage kind of guy. Never see a LOS power rating anywhere,so I continue research this idea. Sacks, qb hits, red zone efficiency and rushing differentials properly combined should put a handicapper in good shape. Win the line of scrimmage and turnover battle and have a competent coaching staff will get you the money.............................gl going forward
I don't think it will get you the money....turnovers for example...those with the average turnover advantage over their opponent cover about 47.3% of the time at an average of half a turnover a game.....with an average turnover advantage of over 1 per game it becomes 46.4%,....which means in essence if you take the the much worse team in turnover margin going into the game, you'll cover 53.6% of the time.
If you delete from considering playing away dogs you'll cover 55.5% of the time.
Query text.......tA(TOM)-oA(TOM)>1 and week>6 and playoffs=0 and AD, AF, HF, HD
This is the query text you're looking for, for totals....p:ou margin<0 and pp:ou margin<0... denotes a team has gone UNDER their two previous games.
Or, you could do............ou streak<-3.......which means a team has gone UNDER at least four games in a row, or......ou streak>2 which means a team has gone OVER at least 3 games in a row.
1
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: @jowchoo Pressure rates and other sack predictors are at the top of what I track. Amazingly, the team that statistically should win the sack and pressure battles are only covering at about 30%! This is what is driving me absolutely bonkers this season. I have always been a line of scrimmage kind of guy. Never see a LOS power rating anywhere,so I continue research this idea. Sacks, qb hits, red zone efficiency and rushing differentials properly combined should put a handicapper in good shape. Win the line of scrimmage and turnover battle and have a competent coaching staff will get you the money.............................gl going forward
I don't think it will get you the money....turnovers for example...those with the average turnover advantage over their opponent cover about 47.3% of the time at an average of half a turnover a game.....with an average turnover advantage of over 1 per game it becomes 46.4%,....which means in essence if you take the the much worse team in turnover margin going into the game, you'll cover 53.6% of the time.
If you delete from considering playing away dogs you'll cover 55.5% of the time.
Query text.......tA(TOM)-oA(TOM)>1 and week>6 and playoffs=0 and AD, AF, HF, HD
This is the query text you're looking for, for totals....p:ou margin<0 and pp:ou margin<0... denotes a team has gone UNDER their two previous games.
Or, you could do............ou streak<-3.......which means a team has gone UNDER at least four games in a row, or......ou streak>2 which means a team has gone OVER at least 3 games in a row.
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: @jowchoo Pressure rates and other sack predictors are at the top of what I track. Amazingly, the team that statistically should win the sack and pressure battles are only covering at about 30%! This is what is driving me absolutely bonkers this season. I have always been a line of scrimmage kind of guy. Never see a LOS power rating anywhere,so I continue research this idea. Sacks, qb hits, red zone efficiency and rushing differentials properly combined should put a handicapper in good shape. Win the line of scrimmage and turnover battle and have a competent coaching staff will get you the money.............................gl going forward I don't think it will get you the money....turnovers for example...those with the average turnover advantage over their opponent cover about 47.3% of the time at an average of half a turnover a game.....with an average turnover advantage of over 1 per game it becomes 46.4%,....which means in essence if you take the the much worse team in turnover margin going into the game, you'll cover 53.6% of the time. If you delete from considering playing away dogs from consideration you'll cover 55.5% of the time. Query text.......tA(TOM)-oA(TOM)>1 and week>6 and playoffs=0 and AD, AF, HF, HD This is the query text you're looking for, for totals....p:ou margin<0 and pp:ou margin<0...which denotes a team has gone UNDER their two previous games.
Again, so kind to share. You have been very quiet lately, was concerned. Thought you were zeroing in on CFL plays. Good Luck,we are going to need it
if the mental midgets steal another US election.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: @jowchoo Pressure rates and other sack predictors are at the top of what I track. Amazingly, the team that statistically should win the sack and pressure battles are only covering at about 30%! This is what is driving me absolutely bonkers this season. I have always been a line of scrimmage kind of guy. Never see a LOS power rating anywhere,so I continue research this idea. Sacks, qb hits, red zone efficiency and rushing differentials properly combined should put a handicapper in good shape. Win the line of scrimmage and turnover battle and have a competent coaching staff will get you the money.............................gl going forward I don't think it will get you the money....turnovers for example...those with the average turnover advantage over their opponent cover about 47.3% of the time at an average of half a turnover a game.....with an average turnover advantage of over 1 per game it becomes 46.4%,....which means in essence if you take the the much worse team in turnover margin going into the game, you'll cover 53.6% of the time. If you delete from considering playing away dogs from consideration you'll cover 55.5% of the time. Query text.......tA(TOM)-oA(TOM)>1 and week>6 and playoffs=0 and AD, AF, HF, HD This is the query text you're looking for, for totals....p:ou margin<0 and pp:ou margin<0...which denotes a team has gone UNDER their two previous games.
Again, so kind to share. You have been very quiet lately, was concerned. Thought you were zeroing in on CFL plays. Good Luck,we are going to need it
I'm in the jungle here in Southeast Asia too. Nothing like those 1 AM and 4 AM starting times for NFL games. At least those Europe games are on at a decent time. Great post, by the way.
1
I'm in the jungle here in Southeast Asia too. Nothing like those 1 AM and 4 AM starting times for NFL games. At least those Europe games are on at a decent time. Great post, by the way.
I'm in the jungle here in Southeast Asia too. Nothing like those 1 AM and 4 AM starting times for NFL games. At least those Europe games are on at a decent time. Great post, by the way.
I am an hour north of Khon Kaen and are now used to the odd hours but it took me a decade...haha.............................gl
0
Quote Originally Posted by konabuzz:
I'm in the jungle here in Southeast Asia too. Nothing like those 1 AM and 4 AM starting times for NFL games. At least those Europe games are on at a decent time. Great post, by the way.
I am an hour north of Khon Kaen and are now used to the odd hours but it took me a decade...haha.............................gl
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999: Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: @jowchoo Pressure rates and other sack predictors are at the top of what I track. Amazingly, the team that statistically should win the sack and pressure battles are only covering at about 30%! This is what is driving me absolutely bonkers this season. I have always been a line of scrimmage kind of guy. Never see a LOS power rating anywhere,so I continue research this idea. Sacks, qb hits, red zone efficiency and rushing differentials properly combined should put a handicapper in good shape. Win the line of scrimmage and turnover battle and have a competent coaching staff will get you the money.............................gl going forward I don't think it will get you the money....turnovers for example...those with the average turnover advantage over their opponent cover about 47.3% of the time at an average of half a turnover a game.....with an average turnover advantage of over 1 per game it becomes 46.4%,....which means in essence if you take the the much worse team in turnover margin going into the game, you'll cover 53.6% of the time. If you delete from considering playing away dogs from consideration you'll cover 55.5% of the time. Query text.......tA(TOM)-oA(TOM)>1 and week>6 and playoffs=0 and AD, AF, HF, HD This is the query text you're looking for, for totals....p:ou margin<0 and pp:ou margin<0...which denotes a team has gone UNDER their two previous games. Again, so kind to share. You have been very quiet lately, was concerned. Thought you were zeroing in on CFL plays. Good Luck,we are going to need it if the mental midgets steal another US election.
Have had the best season ever in the CFL....faded the Lions almost every game the last part of the season and was on Hamilton almost every game last part as well.
"I have been seeing the field" as they say in sports
"Better to be lucky than good" is never more apropos than when betting the NFL.....
Should be a very good week in the NFL this coming week.
Moved back to Oz a couple of months ago, and am strongly considering a move to Thailand or PI when the new year eventuates.
1
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999: Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: @jowchoo Pressure rates and other sack predictors are at the top of what I track. Amazingly, the team that statistically should win the sack and pressure battles are only covering at about 30%! This is what is driving me absolutely bonkers this season. I have always been a line of scrimmage kind of guy. Never see a LOS power rating anywhere,so I continue research this idea. Sacks, qb hits, red zone efficiency and rushing differentials properly combined should put a handicapper in good shape. Win the line of scrimmage and turnover battle and have a competent coaching staff will get you the money.............................gl going forward I don't think it will get you the money....turnovers for example...those with the average turnover advantage over their opponent cover about 47.3% of the time at an average of half a turnover a game.....with an average turnover advantage of over 1 per game it becomes 46.4%,....which means in essence if you take the the much worse team in turnover margin going into the game, you'll cover 53.6% of the time. If you delete from considering playing away dogs from consideration you'll cover 55.5% of the time. Query text.......tA(TOM)-oA(TOM)>1 and week>6 and playoffs=0 and AD, AF, HF, HD This is the query text you're looking for, for totals....p:ou margin<0 and pp:ou margin<0...which denotes a team has gone UNDER their two previous games. Again, so kind to share. You have been very quiet lately, was concerned. Thought you were zeroing in on CFL plays. Good Luck,we are going to need it if the mental midgets steal another US election.
Have had the best season ever in the CFL....faded the Lions almost every game the last part of the season and was on Hamilton almost every game last part as well.
"I have been seeing the field" as they say in sports
"Better to be lucky than good" is never more apropos than when betting the NFL.....
Should be a very good week in the NFL this coming week.
Moved back to Oz a couple of months ago, and am strongly considering a move to Thailand or PI when the new year eventuates.
The second week of this current form model that went (5-1) last week shows these teams with multiple hits. !. BALT -9.5 2. BUFF -3 3. KC -9.5 4. MINN -3 5. GB -4.5 6. NYJ -6.5 Being a DOG and UNDER bettor, this list of favorites looks like a bankroll destroyer, we will see going forward.
Looks like indigo is correct. This list was indeed a bankroll destroyer (1-5)
Will continue to monitor for patterns.
1
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
The second week of this current form model that went (5-1) last week shows these teams with multiple hits. !. BALT -9.5 2. BUFF -3 3. KC -9.5 4. MINN -3 5. GB -4.5 6. NYJ -6.5 Being a DOG and UNDER bettor, this list of favorites looks like a bankroll destroyer, we will see going forward.
Looks like indigo is correct. This list was indeed a bankroll destroyer (1-5)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.