All Forums | NFL Betting

Rodgers as a Dog

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4304
Posts: 62
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 351
Posted: #1
This past season Rodgers and Packers were 0-3 SU/ATS as underdogs, losing all games by DD with an average loss of 17.6 points.  

Since post their SB winning season ARod and the Pack have been under dogs 13 times in four years, only one of these games was in the playoffs which was last year at home against the Niners losing by 3.  

Packers are 2-11 SU and 3-10 ATS in these 13 games.  In the 10 SU losses 3 of them they lost by 7 points of less, the other 4 were double digit losses, including the one to open up the 2014 season at Seattle. 

GL with whatever side you may be on 
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 9634
Posted: #2
Nice stats angle and thanks for sharing it. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #3
Good I'm on Seattle

He's definitely a dog here....good luck against the Legion of Boom with a torn quad

Good luck to the Green Bay defense, never keen on physical running attacks, with Beast Mode and Wilson bootlegs

I see a Green Bay win here
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #4
i meant calf not quad was thinking of Peyton u kno what I meant
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 37948
Posted: #5
SUPERBOWL - SEATTLE vs. INDY
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 2297
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by mjm1012:

SUPERBOWL - SEATTLE vs. INDY

Who the hell is gonna watch that garbage?
If the NFL is gonna fix it for the Colts to beat the Pats. Why don't they fix it for GB to beat SEA as well?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by Lefty1981:


Who the hell is gonna watch that garbage?
If the NFL is gonna fix it for the Colts to beat the Pats. Why don't they fix it for GB to beat SEA as well?


Because they don't want a gimp qb in the Super Bowl.  That's why.

Good luck gimpy Rodgers vs Brady and Co you may as well skip the game it's over before it begins

Any other combination has a chance for a great game
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14925
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by budwiser:



Because they don't want a gimp qb in the Super Bowl.  That's why.

Good luck gimpy Rodgers vs Brady and Co you may as well skip the game it's over before it begins

Any other combination has a chance for a great game

 

I'm probably gonna put another K on Seattle to win the SB at +125. Who knows what that line will be if they dominate the Packers and end up playing Indi.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:


 

I'm probably gonna put another K on Seattle to win the SB at +125. Who knows what that line will be if they dominate the Packers and end up playing Indi.


I wouldn't do that I've got Seattle only this game, maybe I'll have Seattle next game maybe not

If they win by more than 7 you win your bet and roll it over

jmo good luck same side
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14925
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by budwiser:



I wouldn't do that I've got Seattle only this game, maybe I'll have Seattle next game maybe not

If they win by more than 7 you win your bet and roll it over

jmo good luck same side

Rolling over a -7 line (which may not hit) doesn't give you the value of a futures at +125. If I was gonna roll over anything I'd have to take the Hawks at -310 and then roll that over. Say I did that and the Hawks are -300 against the next opponent (and don't fool yourself into thinking they can't), then I'd only win 777 for the 1000 I invested, whereas I can win 1250 if I put it now. People told me to do the same thing with the Hawks winning the division. I got them at -120, -133, and -135. The Carolina ML was -700 and now the ML is -310. If I had rolled over the ML I would be worse off. The oddsmakers have had a tough time with Seattle (their futures were way off, and offered a lot of value, even just before the playoffs).
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:


Rolling over a -7 line (which may not hit) doesn't give you the value of a futures at +125. If I was gonna roll over anything I'd have to take the Hawks at -310 and then roll that over. Say I did that and the Hawks are -300 against the next opponent (and don't fool yourself into thinking they can't), then I'd only win 777 for the 1000 I invested, whereas I can win 1250 if I put it now. People told me to do the same thing with the Hawks winning the division. I got them at -120, -133, and -135. The Carolina ML was -700 and now the ML is -310. If I had rolled over the ML I would be worse off. The oddsmakers have had a tough time with Seattle (their futures were way off, and offered a lot of value, even just before the playoffs).


OK that's fine

Me, I'm rolling it over.  Seahawks -7 and if they win put it all on the Super Bowl, a 2-teamer.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 1529
Posted: #12

Packers are 2-11 SU and 3-10 ATS in these 13 games.  In the 10 SU losses 3 of them they lost by 7 points of less, the other 4 were double digit losses, including the one to open up the 2014 season at Seattle.

 

Is my math off or are we missing some games in the stats? 

Packers are stated as being 2-11 SU

in the "10" SU losses (should be 11?), 3 of them Pack lost by < 7

the other "4" (should be 8?), Pack lost by double digits...

So we are missing the results for 4 of the SU losses, correct?

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 828
Posted: #13
Can anyone point out seattle's last...... Good quality win?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14925
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by cdubz34:

Can anyone point out seattle's last...... Good quality win?

How about winning the toughest division in football. Niners could easily have been a 10 win team (even with the two losses to Seattle).
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 746
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by budwiser:



Because they don't want a gimp qb in the Super Bowl.  That's why.

Good luck gimpy Rodgers vs Brady and Co you may as well skip the game it's over before it begins

Any other combination has a chance for a great game

  
  ill take Rogers on one leg over Brady 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14925
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by NOTHINGTODO:


  
  ill take Rogers on one leg over Brady 

You guys amaze me. You think Rodgers is going out there to play chess? This is not Michel Jordan battling the flu or Willis Reed playing for a few minutes to inspire his team, this is football, the toughest sport out there next to hockey, boxing and MMA. Now you have a gimpy QB going up against a talented, fast, ferocious defense for all the marbles. The question isn't what could happen (because anything could happen) but what is likely to happen.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 746
Posted: #17
Rogers will be good enough to win,  positive reports today on his health 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 5358
Posted: #18
i respect greenbay but to win at seattle rodgers injured or not will be a heavy task
but rodgers is limping badly.
Seattle will win this game.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 828
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:

Quote Originally Posted by cdubz34:


Can anyone point out seattle's last...... Good quality win?
How about winning the toughest division in football. Niners could easily have been a 10 win team (even with the two losses to Seattle).



Niners coulda easily been a 10 win team? Making them what? A playoff outsider . Rem Detroit and GB both finished 12-4.

Nfc was not the toughest division in football. Facing Hill, a 3rd stringer from AZ, and kapernick is far from challenging.... Seattles defense has not been tested, really since Dallas
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14925
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by cdubz34:

How about winning the toughest division in football. Niners could easily have been a 10 win team (even with the two losses to Seattle).


Niners coulda easily been a 10 win team? Making them what? A playoff outsider . Rem Detroit and GB both finished 12-4.

Nfc was not the toughest division in football. Facing Hill, a 3rd stringer from AZ, and kapernick is far from challenging.... Seattles defense has not been tested, really since Dallas

Two teams that couldn't beat the Buffalo Bills! 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14925
Posted: #21
And got to beat up on the poor Bears and Vikings. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 828
Posted: #22
All I'm saying. Seattle hasn't had a challenge in a LONG time. They haven't faced a QB that has even attempted to put pressure on that defense like rodgers lacy Nelson Cobb and company will Sunday.

Folks. GB is headed to zona

BOL
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14925
Posted: #23
The game will not be decided by GB O vs Seattle D (that might be a wash). You are capping it wrong based on the narrative ESPN is selling. The game will be decided by Seattle O vs GB D. where Seattle has a big advantage. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 2735
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by NOTHINGTODO:


  
  ill take Rogers on one leg over Brady 

 

what are you smoking on? Rodgers is the best QB in the league when 100% healthy, you would take him on 1 leg over Brady? You must be out of your mind. Brady is not Manning.

 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:


Two teams that couldn't beat the Buffalo Bills! 

 

So losing to the 9-7 Bills is ,

But you wont say anything about losing to the 6-10 Rams?? 

Or, two NFC West teams??

 

Cam Newton and that terrible offense was a pick 6 away from making that a very close game...and that's with no offense threats at all...

Rodgers injury is being way over-played here

All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.