All Forums | NFL Betting

Saints ml +335 & +8.5 HUGE!!!!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3799
Posts: 55
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 31214
Posted: #1
Money James.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2013
Posts: 3251
Posted: #2
Quote Originally Posted by LawsonJames:

Money James.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 38704
Posted: #3
As huge as the Heat last night?  
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 18584
Posted: #4
Seahawks going to pound them again.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 2260
Posted: #5
you are on them
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 17342
Posted: #6

Quote Originally Posted by Chimpo:

you are on them

 

What he said.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 858
Posted: #7
Lawbron choke James
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 22698
Posted: #8
Money Lockson James!


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2770
Posted: #9
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 2590
Posted: #10

Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

As huge as the Heat last night?  

Good one lol

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 1889
Posted: #11
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 13189
Posted: #12
OH GAWD NOW I HAVE TO WORRY
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 1424
Posted: #13
seattle wins but the points win NO keep it close this time around
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 1255
Posted: #14
LJ can only bet baseball. Fade everything else. The points look OK but ML? HAHAHA
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 41623
Posted: #15
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 36941
Posted: #16
I'm very happy to see LJ on the Saints!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 769
Posted: #17
Really like the Saints + the points. 

And note (svp) I bet heavily against them in recent regular season loss, and, if I may say so, in the much-ballyhooed "beast mode" playoff loss some years ago.

reasons:

1. team ritalin (Seattle) missing more guys.

2. games at Qwest in my experience often turn rapidly south or wind up being really close.  i don't have numbers.  but i don't put a lot of emphasis on blowouts -- if anything, there's normally a bounceback.

i'm just guessing that most games at Qwest are either easy covers, or non-covers.... 

hence i don't credit much the recent Seattle mauling.  the game went south and the Saints sunk.  Seattle at home is a front-runner team...  or runs into trouble (as a cover proposition).

3. recent loss to Arizona exposes some Shehawk vulnerabilities.

4. the Saints played recently in Seattle.  they've been through it.  and they have a grudge.

5. i love Marshawn Lynch. Love him.  He's been beaten up the last few years.  check out his recent performances. 

Finally, Pete Carroll is too clever by half.  He'll do some cute things that backfire.  Payton and Ryan good minds, good at bounceback games.

I would not go Saints money-line.  But I like the points.  I think they'll keep it close.


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 6196
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by gfoss59:

Really like the Saints + the points. 

And note (svp) I bet heavily against them in recent regular season loss, and, if I may say so, in the much-ballyhooed "beast mode" playoff loss some years ago.

reasons:

1. team ritalin (Seattle) missing more guys.

2. games at Qwest in my experience often turn rapidly south or wind up being really close.  i don't have numbers.  but i don't put a lot of emphasis on blowouts -- if anything, there's normally a bounceback.

i'm just guessing that most games at Qwest are either easy covers, or non-covers.... 

hence i don't credit much the recent Seattle mauling.  the game went south and the Saints sunk.  Seattle at home is a front-runner team...  or runs into trouble (as a cover proposition).

3. recent loss to Arizona exposes some Shehawk vulnerabilities.

4. the Saints played recently in Seattle.  they've been through it.  and they have a grudge.

5. i love Marshawn Lynch. Love him.  He's been beaten up the last few years.  check out his recent performances. 

Finally, Pete Carroll is too clever by half.  He'll do some cute things that backfire.  Payton and Ryan good minds, good at bounceback games.

I would not go Saints money-line.  But I like the points.  I think they'll keep it close.



typing stuff you want to be true, doesn't make it true.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 1255
Posted: #19
It's not even qwest field. Next thing you know this guy will be saying seahawks can't win without Shaun Alexander. Your post was a waste of time and space GFOSS. PLEASE PLEASE make some big bets on saints ML.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 872
Posted: #20
After the Saints season is over everyone will talk about how good of a job Payton and co did with this team after the scandal and the 9ers Seahawks matchup will make us all forget this weekend
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 411
Posted: #21
Anybody saying "Saints ML Huge" is out of their minds. Why would you bet that after you just saw these 2 teams play 6 weeks ago on the same field. Nobody wins in Seattle! Go see a doctor
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 36941
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by gfoss59:

Really like the Saints + the points. 

And note (svp) I bet heavily against them in recent regular season loss, and, if I may say so, in the much-ballyhooed "beast mode" playoff loss some years ago.

reasons:

1. team ritalin (Seattle) missing more guys.

2. games at Qwest in my experience often turn rapidly south or wind up being really close.  i don't have numbers.  but i don't put a lot of emphasis on blowouts -- if anything, there's normally a bounceback.

i'm just guessing that most games at Qwest are either easy covers, or non-covers.... 

hence i don't credit much the recent Seattle mauling.  the game went south and the Saints sunk.  Seattle at home is a front-runner team...  or runs into trouble (as a cover proposition).

3. recent loss to Arizona exposes some Shehawk vulnerabilities.

4. the Saints played recently in Seattle.  they've been through it.  and they have a grudge.

5. i love Marshawn Lynch. Love him.  He's been beaten up the last few years.  check out his recent performances. 

Finally, Pete Carroll is too clever by half.  He'll do some cute things that backfire.  Payton and Ryan good minds, good at bounceback games.

I would not go Saints money-line.  But I like the points.  I think they'll keep it close.



 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 769
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by bryanoens:

It's not even qwest field. Next thing you know this guy will be saying seahawks can't win without Shaun Alexander. Your post was a waste of time and space GFOSS. PLEASE PLEASE make some big bets on saints ML.


yah, yah.  we know, Team Ritalin keeps re-prostituting itself.

"irony and pity," as Hemingway said.  "irony and pity." 

of course, it's always dangerous to be sarcastic....  but especially so on Covers.  not to mention with the dim-witted on covers.

i don't hate or love the Saints or Shehawks on ML.  but i love the Saints plus the points.


 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 769
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by vanhawk:

Anybody saying "Saints ML Huge" is out of their minds. Why would you bet that after you just saw these 2 teams play 6 weeks ago on the same field. Nobody wins in Seattle! Go see a doctor


what is your theory of how the Carson-Palmer-led Cardinals won?

I don't ask this elliptically...  there may be a good answer....  but I'm curious.
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 6196
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by gfoss59:

Really like the Saints + the points. 

And note (svp) I bet heavily against them in recent regular season loss, and, if I may say so, in the much-ballyhooed "beast mode" playoff loss some years ago.

reasons:

1. team ritalin (Seattle) missing more guys.




Actually, Seattle will have Walter Thurmond, and Percy Harvin playing, both didn't play last time these two teams met. So they are clearly missing less guys.


So now was that comment sarcasm, or just stupidity like the rest of the stuff you posted?
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.