What is really curious is that there was no discussion of this call. The TB head coach didn't even throw a fit. They didn't bring in the Head of NFL Officiating like they do in damn near every questionable call. They still have not talked about it in post-game. Almost like this was in the script!
0
What is really curious is that there was no discussion of this call. The TB head coach didn't even throw a fit. They didn't bring in the Head of NFL Officiating like they do in damn near every questionable call. They still have not talked about it in post-game. Almost like this was in the script!
Look at that... Curt Mentafee even had a hard time holding back a smile. God I hate the Saints. First they cheat their way to a Superbowl and the NFL does whatever they can to give them a win.
0
Look at that... Curt Mentafee even had a hard time holding back a smile. God I hate the Saints. First they cheat their way to a Superbowl and the NFL does whatever they can to give them a win.
Mike Ferreira said because the QB was out of pocket there is no contact
penalty and the wr cannot be the first to touch the ball regardless of
his feet. Stupid rule. I would tell my defenders if the qb rolls out
hammer the wrs out of bounds obviously it is legal.
0
Mike Ferreira said because the QB was out of pocket there is no contact
penalty and the wr cannot be the first to touch the ball regardless of
his feet. Stupid rule. I would tell my defenders if the qb rolls out
hammer the wrs out of bounds obviously it is legal.
Yeah I heard that and frankly that is plain wrong. So let me get this straight... if the QB gets out of the pocket you can push all receivers out of bounds and cannot be the first to touch it. So what is the QB supposed to do... either run it in himself or pass off the helmet of a defender, catch it and throw it again? What is the logic to this rule? Why should you be allowed to push a receiver out of bounds ever? It goes in the face of every rule you have. But even if you can fine, what is the purpose that after the receiver reestablishes himself he cannot be the first to touch it? I understand the logic to when the receiver voluntarily runs out of bounds (seen that call many times) but never, never, NEVER when a defender pushes a receiver out of bounds... especially in the goal line. I will be looking up this rule to see how it exactly reads.
0
Yeah I heard that and frankly that is plain wrong. So let me get this straight... if the QB gets out of the pocket you can push all receivers out of bounds and cannot be the first to touch it. So what is the QB supposed to do... either run it in himself or pass off the helmet of a defender, catch it and throw it again? What is the logic to this rule? Why should you be allowed to push a receiver out of bounds ever? It goes in the face of every rule you have. But even if you can fine, what is the purpose that after the receiver reestablishes himself he cannot be the first to touch it? I understand the logic to when the receiver voluntarily runs out of bounds (seen that call many times) but never, never, NEVER when a defender pushes a receiver out of bounds... especially in the goal line. I will be looking up this rule to see how it exactly reads.
Mike Ferreira said because the QB was out of pocket there is no contact
penalty and the wr cannot be the first to touch the ball regardless of
his feet. Stupid rule. I would tell my defenders if the qb rolls out
hammer the wrs out of bounds obviously it is legal.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ctg:
Mike Ferreira said because the QB was out of pocket there is no contact
penalty and the wr cannot be the first to touch the ball regardless of
his feet. Stupid rule. I would tell my defenders if the qb rolls out
hammer the wrs out of bounds obviously it is legal.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
......bullshit
Hot Forum Topics
