Still have 4 MNF pending
Anchor candidates, NET +5
MINN
Anchor candidates, NET +4
CHIC (W)
INDY (W)
CAR (L)
BALT (OV)
CAR +4(OV)
SEA +4(OV)
WASH +4 (OV)
Still have 4 MNF pending
Anchor candidates, NET +5
MINN
Anchor candidates, NET +4
CHIC (W)
INDY (W)
CAR (L)
BALT (OV)
CAR +4(OV)
SEA +4(OV)
WASH +4 (OV)
Still have 4 MNF pending
Anchor candidates, NET +5
MINN
Anchor candidates, NET +4
CHIC (W)
INDY (W)
CAR (L)
BALT (OV)
CAR +4(OV)
SEA +4(OV)
WASH +4 (OV)
@jowchoo
Tailed you on the LAC over/under teaser yesterday. At least I think that’s what you were getting at. Made for some nice gains. Nice work Jow keep it coming.
@jowchoo
Tailed you on the LAC over/under teaser yesterday. At least I think that’s what you were getting at. Made for some nice gains. Nice work Jow keep it coming.
After waiting 4 weeks for data to use, week 5 and week 6 have behaved very nicely. Must be prudent and not get greedy.
Combining SDQL queries with regression status has been developing and looks good going forward...........................gl
After waiting 4 weeks for data to use, week 5 and week 6 have behaved very nicely. Must be prudent and not get greedy.
Combining SDQL queries with regression status has been developing and looks good going forward...........................gl
Both :
BUFF -2.5
NYJ teasers +8
MNF 4-0
YTD: 127-80-1 (61.1%)
Both :
BUFF -2.5
NYJ teasers +8
MNF 4-0
YTD: 127-80-1 (61.1%)
It is ALL about regression. INDY NET+4 (W) ats, Vegas will overvalue their spread, that combined with teaser insurance =+EV
It is ALL about regression. INDY NET+4 (W) ats, Vegas will overvalue their spread, that combined with teaser insurance =+EV
In addition the regressions for totals are all high totals.
The CAROLINA total came close as an anchor this week and still might become one later this week.
In addition the regressions for totals are all high totals.
The CAROLINA total came close as an anchor this week and still might become one later this week.
Here's what I don't understand. You take the regression anchor and it's paired with every other bet? So if your anchor loses, you lose every bet? Or am I reading this wrong?
Here's what I don't understand. You take the regression anchor and it's paired with every other bet? So if your anchor loses, you lose every bet? Or am I reading this wrong?
Yes, you are correct.
Yes, you are correct.
Thank you. And that's somehow better than pairing each of your other bets with each other in some fashion?
Thank you. And that's somehow better than pairing each of your other bets with each other in some fashion?
My data base is down right now...sorry
My data base is down right now...sorry
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.