I looked at every single
game this week and one stood out like a sore thumb. This might be the
most confident game I've ever analyzed based on the #'s.
Let's start off by
looking at the playoff teams by turnover differential. This historically
has had a clear trend line to playoff teams and those who make a deep run which
is evident by #1-7 are all playoff teams and 10 of the top 11.
#1 - Patriots
#2 - Saints
#3 - Packers
#4 - Seahawks
#5 - Vikings
#6 - Ravens
#7 - Chiefs
#9 - Titans
#10 - Bills
#11 - 49ers
#16 - Texans
#22 - Eagles
For reference, in 2018
the top 7 also all made the playoffs with the Superbowl match up #4 vs
#5.
Next - my favorite stat
in football is both explosive plays and toxic differential. Explosive
plays on offense are 20+ yard gains through the air or 10+ yards on the rush and
toxic differential is the delta between toxic allowed on defense vs produced on
offense.
#8 overall is Seattle
with a balanced attack ranking 8th in offense and 10th in passing.
Seattle’s struggles defensively have primarily been driven by the run game as they
are 30th in the league in explosive runs allowed but 18th
in passing.Seattle has 5 losses this
year as they finished 11-5, the 5 losses came from teams ranked #9, #8, #12, #1
and #2.Against teams that were #13 or
higher, they finished 11-0.The Eagles
are 19th in explosive plays on offense in the running game.
On the other side of the ball, the Eagles are known to have a
stout defensive line that limits the run game, however they ranked 19th
in the league on defense against the run with 12% of carries going for 10+.Seattle has the 8th ranked offense
for explosive plays with 13% of their runs going for 10+ yards.You can say that was before injuries but that
rate was even higher against the 49ers on Sunday with Homer and Lynch getting
all of the carries.
Strength of Schedule.The Seahawks finished #1 overall in strength of schedule and still managed
to scrape out 11 wins with 10 of them coming within a single possession (they
can win close games).The Eagles finished
at 9-7 playing the 29th toughest schedule in the league.
From an injury standpoint, they lose Mychal Kendricks but get
back Quandre Diggs and potentially Duane Brown, although Fant handled Bosa just
fine last week.
The Seahawks are the better team, 7-1 on the road this
season and 5-1 on natural grass. I don’t
think this is a game we sweat, give me the Seahawks -1.5 in the biggest game I’ll
have ever played.
1
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I looked at every single
game this week and one stood out like a sore thumb. This might be the
most confident game I've ever analyzed based on the #'s.
Let's start off by
looking at the playoff teams by turnover differential. This historically
has had a clear trend line to playoff teams and those who make a deep run which
is evident by #1-7 are all playoff teams and 10 of the top 11.
#1 - Patriots
#2 - Saints
#3 - Packers
#4 - Seahawks
#5 - Vikings
#6 - Ravens
#7 - Chiefs
#9 - Titans
#10 - Bills
#11 - 49ers
#16 - Texans
#22 - Eagles
For reference, in 2018
the top 7 also all made the playoffs with the Superbowl match up #4 vs
#5.
Next - my favorite stat
in football is both explosive plays and toxic differential. Explosive
plays on offense are 20+ yard gains through the air or 10+ yards on the rush and
toxic differential is the delta between toxic allowed on defense vs produced on
offense.
#8 overall is Seattle
with a balanced attack ranking 8th in offense and 10th in passing.
Seattle’s struggles defensively have primarily been driven by the run game as they
are 30th in the league in explosive runs allowed but 18th
in passing.Seattle has 5 losses this
year as they finished 11-5, the 5 losses came from teams ranked #9, #8, #12, #1
and #2.Against teams that were #13 or
higher, they finished 11-0.The Eagles
are 19th in explosive plays on offense in the running game.
On the other side of the ball, the Eagles are known to have a
stout defensive line that limits the run game, however they ranked 19th
in the league on defense against the run with 12% of carries going for 10+.Seattle has the 8th ranked offense
for explosive plays with 13% of their runs going for 10+ yards.You can say that was before injuries but that
rate was even higher against the 49ers on Sunday with Homer and Lynch getting
all of the carries.
Strength of Schedule.The Seahawks finished #1 overall in strength of schedule and still managed
to scrape out 11 wins with 10 of them coming within a single possession (they
can win close games).The Eagles finished
at 9-7 playing the 29th toughest schedule in the league.
From an injury standpoint, they lose Mychal Kendricks but get
back Quandre Diggs and potentially Duane Brown, although Fant handled Bosa just
fine last week.
The Seahawks are the better team, 7-1 on the road this
season and 5-1 on natural grass. I don’t
think this is a game we sweat, give me the Seahawks -1.5 in the biggest game I’ll
have ever played.
Historically home favorites haven't done very well SU in wild card weekend last 10 years... Having said that, Seattle is very good at winning close games (except week 17 when they botched a huge game at the end).
My biggest reason for taking Seattle in this spot is that Philadelphia is coming off max effort in 4 consecutive games where they were all essentially must win type games. Now they have to give full effort again.. how much do they physically have left in the tank? Yes, Seattle could have avoided this game by beating SF but let's be real, its hard to win twice against a really good team in the nfl and they were underdogs for that reason. Seattle knows they can go on the road where they seem to play much better and win a game.
Jury is still out on Carson Wentz... I get the injuries to his WR, but look who the Eagles have faced last 5 weeks.. Definetly not a Russell Wilson or Pete Carroll led team.
L @ Miami
W vs. NYG (barely)
W @ Washington (barely)
W vs. Dallas
W @ NYG
SEATTLE 24 PHILADELPHIA 17
0
Historically home favorites haven't done very well SU in wild card weekend last 10 years... Having said that, Seattle is very good at winning close games (except week 17 when they botched a huge game at the end).
My biggest reason for taking Seattle in this spot is that Philadelphia is coming off max effort in 4 consecutive games where they were all essentially must win type games. Now they have to give full effort again.. how much do they physically have left in the tank? Yes, Seattle could have avoided this game by beating SF but let's be real, its hard to win twice against a really good team in the nfl and they were underdogs for that reason. Seattle knows they can go on the road where they seem to play much better and win a game.
Jury is still out on Carson Wentz... I get the injuries to his WR, but look who the Eagles have faced last 5 weeks.. Definetly not a Russell Wilson or Pete Carroll led team.
I'm not going to tell you that you are wrong but the playoffs aren't about who the better team is but who is the better team RIGHT NOW.Good luck
Eagles are playing very well right now and are at home.....tread carefully with Seattle even though your write-up is very valid I do believe a team that's been coming on as of late is a better team then one that may just fall short like they did in their past home game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by EastsideBangers:
I'm not going to tell you that you are wrong but the playoffs aren't about who the better team is but who is the better team RIGHT NOW.Good luck
Eagles are playing very well right now and are at home.....tread carefully with Seattle even though your write-up is very valid I do believe a team that's been coming on as of late is a better team then one that may just fall short like they did in their past home game.
Historically home favorites haven't done very well SU in wild card weekend last 10 years... Having said that, Seattle is very good at winning close games (except week 17 when they botched a huge game at the end). My biggest reason for taking Seattle in this spot is that Philadelphia is coming off max effort in 4 consecutive games where they were all essentially must win type games. Now they have to give full effort again.. how much do they physically have left in the tank? Yes, Seattle could have avoided this game by beating SF but let's be real, its hard to win twice against a really good team in the nfl and they were underdogs for that reason. Seattle knows they can go on the road where they seem to play much better and win a game. Jury is still out on Carson Wentz... I get the injuries to his WR, but look who the Eagles have faced last 5 weeks.. Definetly not a Russell Wilson or Pete Carroll led team. L @ Miami W vs. NYG (barely) W @ Washington (barely) W vs. Dallas W @ NYG SEATTLE 24 PHILADELPHIA 17
Just a couple of quick notes:
1. SEA lost that game to the 49'ers by 1 inch.
2. PHI's last 4 wins were against: NYG (4-12), WAS (3-13), DAL (8-8), NYG (4-12) arguably this year's worst division in the NFL.
I am no knocking your post, just adding confidence to the SEA pick.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DON-Chicago:
Historically home favorites haven't done very well SU in wild card weekend last 10 years... Having said that, Seattle is very good at winning close games (except week 17 when they botched a huge game at the end). My biggest reason for taking Seattle in this spot is that Philadelphia is coming off max effort in 4 consecutive games where they were all essentially must win type games. Now they have to give full effort again.. how much do they physically have left in the tank? Yes, Seattle could have avoided this game by beating SF but let's be real, its hard to win twice against a really good team in the nfl and they were underdogs for that reason. Seattle knows they can go on the road where they seem to play much better and win a game. Jury is still out on Carson Wentz... I get the injuries to his WR, but look who the Eagles have faced last 5 weeks.. Definetly not a Russell Wilson or Pete Carroll led team. L @ Miami W vs. NYG (barely) W @ Washington (barely) W vs. Dallas W @ NYG SEATTLE 24 PHILADELPHIA 17
Just a couple of quick notes:
1. SEA lost that game to the 49'ers by 1 inch.
2. PHI's last 4 wins were against: NYG (4-12), WAS (3-13), DAL (8-8), NYG (4-12) arguably this year's worst division in the NFL.
I am no knocking your post, just adding confidence to the SEA pick.
Thanks, this solidifies any Eagles pick even better. Throw all your stats and rankings out the window. Eagles are the hotter more motivated, better coached team. The D Line with Cox, Jernigan, Graham, Barnett playing out of their minds right now and will shred this patched Seattle line.
0
Thanks, this solidifies any Eagles pick even better. Throw all your stats and rankings out the window. Eagles are the hotter more motivated, better coached team. The D Line with Cox, Jernigan, Graham, Barnett playing out of their minds right now and will shred this patched Seattle line.
2. PHI's last 4 wins were against: NYG (4-12), WAS (3-13), DAL (8-8), NYG (4-12) arguably this year's worst division in the NFL.
I am no knocking your post, just adding confidence to the SEA pick.
The line not even reaching a field goal tells you something when this is public data and Seattle already won once in Philly. This is a different team than when they last played.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Donkey_Punch_:
Just a couple of quick notes:
1. SEA lost that game to the 49'ers by 1 inch.
2. PHI's last 4 wins were against: NYG (4-12), WAS (3-13), DAL (8-8), NYG (4-12) arguably this year's worst division in the NFL.
I am no knocking your post, just adding confidence to the SEA pick.
The line not even reaching a field goal tells you something when this is public data and Seattle already won once in Philly. This is a different team than when they last played.
Strength of Schedule Seattle 25 Philadelphia 26 why is everyone not understand what strength of schedule means? It’s opposing teams winning percentage. Oakland was number 1 in SOS.
Strength of schedule doesn't mean crap in the parity era. Everyone sucks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by NONEED4LUCK:
Strength of Schedule Seattle 25 Philadelphia 26 why is everyone not understand what strength of schedule means? It’s opposing teams winning percentage. Oakland was number 1 in SOS.
Strength of schedule doesn't mean crap in the parity era. Everyone sucks.
I looked at every single game this week and one stood out like a sore thumb. This might be the most confident game I've ever analyzed based on the #'s. Let's start off by looking at the playoff teams by turnover differential. This historically has had a clear trend line to playoff teams and those who make a deep run which is evident by #1-7 are all playoff teams and 10 of the top 11. #1 - Patriots #2 - Saints #3 - Packers #4 - Seahawks #5 - Vikings #6 - Ravens #7 - Chiefs #9 - Titans #10 - Bills #11 - 49ers #16 - Texans #22 - Eagles For reference, in 2018 the top 7 also all made the playoffs with the Superbowl match up #4 vs #5. Next - my favorite stat in football is both explosive plays and toxic differential. Explosive plays on offense are 20+ yard gains through the air or 10+ yards on the rush and toxic differential is the delta between toxic allowed on defense vs produced on offense. #8 overall is Seattle with a balanced attack ranking 8th in offense and 10th in passing. Seattle’s struggles defensively have primarily been driven by the run game as they are 30th in the league in explosive runs allowed but 18th in passing. Seattle has 5 losses this year as they finished 11-5, the 5 losses came from teams ranked #9, #8, #12, #1 and #2. Against teams that were #13 or higher, they finished 11-0. The Eagles are 19th in explosive plays on offense in the running game. On the other side of the ball, the Eagles are known to have a stout defensive line that limits the run game, however they ranked 19th in the league on defense against the run with 12% of carries going for 10+. Seattle has the 8th ranked offense for explosive plays with 13% of their runs going for 10+ yards. You can say that was before injuries but that rate was even higher against the 49ers on Sunday with Homer and Lynch getting all of the carries. Strength of Schedule. The Seahawks finished #1 overall in strength of schedule and still managed to scrape out 11 wins with 10 of them coming within a single possession (they can win close games). The Eagles finished at 9-7 playing the 29th toughest schedule in the league. From an injury standpoint, they lose Mychal Kendricks but get back Quandre Diggs and potentially Duane Brown, although Fant handled Bosa just fine last week. The Seahawks are the better team, 7-1 on the road this season and 5-1 on natural grass. I don’t think this is a game we sweat, give me the Seahawks -1.5 in the biggest game I’ll have ever played.
its not about stats anymore i thinks.
but its all about profit for the Vegas, and Eagle would be more profitable for them if eagles win.
just my two cents
best of lucks
lets roll sir
0
Quote Originally Posted by frzgg:
I looked at every single game this week and one stood out like a sore thumb. This might be the most confident game I've ever analyzed based on the #'s. Let's start off by looking at the playoff teams by turnover differential. This historically has had a clear trend line to playoff teams and those who make a deep run which is evident by #1-7 are all playoff teams and 10 of the top 11. #1 - Patriots #2 - Saints #3 - Packers #4 - Seahawks #5 - Vikings #6 - Ravens #7 - Chiefs #9 - Titans #10 - Bills #11 - 49ers #16 - Texans #22 - Eagles For reference, in 2018 the top 7 also all made the playoffs with the Superbowl match up #4 vs #5. Next - my favorite stat in football is both explosive plays and toxic differential. Explosive plays on offense are 20+ yard gains through the air or 10+ yards on the rush and toxic differential is the delta between toxic allowed on defense vs produced on offense. #8 overall is Seattle with a balanced attack ranking 8th in offense and 10th in passing. Seattle’s struggles defensively have primarily been driven by the run game as they are 30th in the league in explosive runs allowed but 18th in passing. Seattle has 5 losses this year as they finished 11-5, the 5 losses came from teams ranked #9, #8, #12, #1 and #2. Against teams that were #13 or higher, they finished 11-0. The Eagles are 19th in explosive plays on offense in the running game. On the other side of the ball, the Eagles are known to have a stout defensive line that limits the run game, however they ranked 19th in the league on defense against the run with 12% of carries going for 10+. Seattle has the 8th ranked offense for explosive plays with 13% of their runs going for 10+ yards. You can say that was before injuries but that rate was even higher against the 49ers on Sunday with Homer and Lynch getting all of the carries. Strength of Schedule. The Seahawks finished #1 overall in strength of schedule and still managed to scrape out 11 wins with 10 of them coming within a single possession (they can win close games). The Eagles finished at 9-7 playing the 29th toughest schedule in the league. From an injury standpoint, they lose Mychal Kendricks but get back Quandre Diggs and potentially Duane Brown, although Fant handled Bosa just fine last week. The Seahawks are the better team, 7-1 on the road this season and 5-1 on natural grass. I don’t think this is a game we sweat, give me the Seahawks -1.5 in the biggest game I’ll have ever played.
its not about stats anymore i thinks.
but its all about profit for the Vegas, and Eagle would be more profitable for them if eagles win.
I can't get the image out of my mind of Wenz in their first meeting with Seattle looking completely pathetic. I backed the Eagles in that one...he was absolutely horrific.
He looks great against subpar teams but even if the Hawks are shells of their former healthier selves, I still prefer them over this Carson jibronie.
Wenz the wax figurine belongs in Madame Tussaud's museum in London, not on a football field.
Good luck backing this bum in his first playoff start. You will need it.
0
I can't get the image out of my mind of Wenz in their first meeting with Seattle looking completely pathetic. I backed the Eagles in that one...he was absolutely horrific.
He looks great against subpar teams but even if the Hawks are shells of their former healthier selves, I still prefer them over this Carson jibronie.
Wenz the wax figurine belongs in Madame Tussaud's museum in London, not on a football field.
Good luck backing this bum in his first playoff start. You will need it.
you forot to take in to account Seattles massive injuries both offense and defense adding more injuries from 49ers game
Eagles got helthy with yioung fast RB's and wr
and on defesne too
Eagles win it 24 - 20
Not sure where this came from but I disagree. Seahawks get Quandre Diggs back which crushed Seattle the past 2 weeks, it's a huge upgrade and changes the complexion of the defense with him at safety. QBR this season with Diggs on the field, 31.2, QBR with Diggs OUT increases to 65.2.
Clowney was also removed from the injury report which should be significant with the Eagles injuries.
Ertz is questionable and still not cleared for contact and it's a huge stretch that he will get cleared. And as of a few minutes ago, Lane Johnson was just ruled out who was the #2 tackle by PFF this season. Lane being out and Clowney active is a big swing.
Final picks for the weekend,
Seattle 1H ML
Seattle -1.5
Houston -2.5
Tennessee +5.5
Vikings +8
Teaser
Vikings +15
Vikings/Saints O42
Seattle +6
Tennessee +12.5
Parlay
Seattle ML
Tennessee ML
0
Quote Originally Posted by zebrakiller:
you forot to take in to account Seattles massive injuries both offense and defense adding more injuries from 49ers game
Eagles got helthy with yioung fast RB's and wr
and on defesne too
Eagles win it 24 - 20
Not sure where this came from but I disagree. Seahawks get Quandre Diggs back which crushed Seattle the past 2 weeks, it's a huge upgrade and changes the complexion of the defense with him at safety. QBR this season with Diggs on the field, 31.2, QBR with Diggs OUT increases to 65.2.
Clowney was also removed from the injury report which should be significant with the Eagles injuries.
Ertz is questionable and still not cleared for contact and it's a huge stretch that he will get cleared. And as of a few minutes ago, Lane Johnson was just ruled out who was the #2 tackle by PFF this season. Lane being out and Clowney active is a big swing.
[/Quote] That's a stupid slogan/cliche , to make you believe any unrealistic outcome they give you. It's not a logical reason for anything.[/Quote]
This may be one of the dumber things I've heard on here. Not trying to insult you, it really is.
So lets say you have team A coming in riding a 5 game winning streak and figured out some issues they were having, made the adjustments from early season struggles and they come up against team B that has a better record bc of a strong start to the season, but are now limping in w 3 losses in their last 5 games, have some key injuries and just struggling to regain their form from early season. But your saying it would be really stupid and completely illogical to give team A a longer look as to which is the right side? You wouldn't give Team A any advantage bc of the current scenario?
GL w your play
0
[/Quote] That's a stupid slogan/cliche , to make you believe any unrealistic outcome they give you. It's not a logical reason for anything.[/Quote]
This may be one of the dumber things I've heard on here. Not trying to insult you, it really is.
So lets say you have team A coming in riding a 5 game winning streak and figured out some issues they were having, made the adjustments from early season struggles and they come up against team B that has a better record bc of a strong start to the season, but are now limping in w 3 losses in their last 5 games, have some key injuries and just struggling to regain their form from early season. But your saying it would be really stupid and completely illogical to give team A a longer look as to which is the right side? You wouldn't give Team A any advantage bc of the current scenario?
That's a stupid slogan/cliche , to make you believe any unrealistic outcome they give you. It's not a logical reason for anything.
This may be one of the dumber things I've heard on here. Not trying to insult you, it really is.
So lets say you have team A coming in riding a 5 game winning streak and figured out some issues they were having, made the adjustments from early season struggles and they come up against team B that has a better record bc of a strong start to the season, but are now limping in w 3 losses in their last 5 games, have some key injuries and just struggling to regain their form from early season. But your saying it would be really stupid and completely illogical to give team A a longer look as to which is the right side? You wouldn't give Team A any advantage bc of the current scenario?
GL w your play
Is this directed at me? What slogan did I give? Not sure where I said it's really stupid to bet the Eagles, I'm basing it off the match-up and Wilson.
If Lane Johnson, Ertz and a single WR were healthy, I'd be much more hesitant. They also finished on a 4 game winning streak against 3 teams with 12 total wins. Seahawks finished 1-3 in last 4 with teams with a combined 31 wins. Quality of opponent means something so I'm not blindly looking at wins and losses.
I think this game has more offense than most expect but I'm sticking with the Seahawks in my most confident bet of the week.
0
Quote Originally Posted by tito40:
That's a stupid slogan/cliche , to make you believe any unrealistic outcome they give you. It's not a logical reason for anything.
This may be one of the dumber things I've heard on here. Not trying to insult you, it really is.
So lets say you have team A coming in riding a 5 game winning streak and figured out some issues they were having, made the adjustments from early season struggles and they come up against team B that has a better record bc of a strong start to the season, but are now limping in w 3 losses in their last 5 games, have some key injuries and just struggling to regain their form from early season. But your saying it would be really stupid and completely illogical to give team A a longer look as to which is the right side? You wouldn't give Team A any advantage bc of the current scenario?
GL w your play
Is this directed at me? What slogan did I give? Not sure where I said it's really stupid to bet the Eagles, I'm basing it off the match-up and Wilson.
If Lane Johnson, Ertz and a single WR were healthy, I'd be much more hesitant. They also finished on a 4 game winning streak against 3 teams with 12 total wins. Seahawks finished 1-3 in last 4 with teams with a combined 31 wins. Quality of opponent means something so I'm not blindly looking at wins and losses.
I think this game has more offense than most expect but I'm sticking with the Seahawks in my most confident bet of the week.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.