this guy is right....but he didnt really explain it right.....this hole has been exposed years and years and very few books still allow it....bet365..still MIGHT...not sure....but you do series of 4- 3 team prop parlays....example....
(first parlay)
A.pitts to recieve opening kickoff
B. pitts to win toss
C. any 3rd leg....lets say hines ward OVER 4 completions
(2nd parlay)
A. pitts to recieve opening kickoff
B. pitts to win coin toss
c. hines under 4 completions
(3rd parlay)
A. GB to win toss
B. GB to recieve opening kickoff
C. Hines over 4 completions
(4th parlay)
A GB to win toss
B GB to recieve opening kickoff
C. hines under 4 completions.....
using this method.....assuming lets say all of the lines were -110...a 3 teamer would pay 6 to 1.......
so say you dropped 100 on each PL....you would lose 3 and win 1....hence winning 400 for each 100 wagered on each parlay......
like i said many books do not allow this anymore...this hole was exposed years ago.....BEFORE 2008......mind you....2008 was the FIRST TIME IN NFL history...that a team won the coin toss and ELECTED TO DEFER....
this guy is right....but he didnt really explain it right.....this hole has been exposed years and years and very few books still allow it....bet365..still MIGHT...not sure....but you do series of 4- 3 team prop parlays....example....
(first parlay)
A.pitts to recieve opening kickoff
B. pitts to win toss
C. any 3rd leg....lets say hines ward OVER 4 completions
(2nd parlay)
A. pitts to recieve opening kickoff
B. pitts to win coin toss
c. hines under 4 completions
(3rd parlay)
A. GB to win toss
B. GB to recieve opening kickoff
C. Hines over 4 completions
(4th parlay)
A GB to win toss
B GB to recieve opening kickoff
C. hines under 4 completions.....
using this method.....assuming lets say all of the lines were -110...a 3 teamer would pay 6 to 1.......
so say you dropped 100 on each PL....you would lose 3 and win 1....hence winning 400 for each 100 wagered on each parlay......
like i said many books do not allow this anymore...this hole was exposed years ago.....BEFORE 2008......mind you....2008 was the FIRST TIME IN NFL history...that a team won the coin toss and ELECTED TO DEFER....
Oh brother
Oh brother
Troy Polamalu Superman (Flying) Tackle! (Steelers vs Titans)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DyzASDVpwU&feature=player_embedded
Troy Polamalu Superman (Flying) Tackle! (Steelers vs Titans)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DyzASDVpwU&feature=player_embedded
I really like
Rodgers Attempts over 34. I have him in the 40's easy. This line to me is way off.
I see no way GB runs the ball with any authority. They will have to pass. If they are complete they keep going,if they are incomplete clock stops and they may get another set of downs. If Pitt gets way up, GB throws. If GB gets way up, they will still need to throw some to keep em honest.
I really love this bet
GL
Also, I looked up Warner in the bowl two years ago against the Steelers, over
and Manning last year was over this also.
Brees and Brady also over this this year.
Finally, they will play this one to the end and maybe even OT (first one)
all to the over
GL
I really like
Rodgers Attempts over 34. I have him in the 40's easy. This line to me is way off.
I see no way GB runs the ball with any authority. They will have to pass. If they are complete they keep going,if they are incomplete clock stops and they may get another set of downs. If Pitt gets way up, GB throws. If GB gets way up, they will still need to throw some to keep em honest.
I really love this bet
GL
Also, I looked up Warner in the bowl two years ago against the Steelers, over
and Manning last year was over this also.
Brees and Brady also over this this year.
Finally, they will play this one to the end and maybe even OT (first one)
all to the over
GL
this guy is right....but he didnt really explain it right.....this hole has been exposed years and years and very few books still allow it....bet365..still MIGHT...not sure....but you do series of 4- 3 team prop parlays....example....
(first parlay)
A.pitts to recieve opening kickoff
B. pitts to win toss
C. any 3rd leg....lets say hines ward OVER 4 completions
(2nd parlay)
A. pitts to recieve opening kickoff
B. pitts to win coin toss
c. hines under 4 completions
(3rd parlay)
A. GB to win toss
B. GB to recieve opening kickoff
C. Hines over 4 completions
(4th parlay)
A GB to win toss
B GB to recieve opening kickoff
C. hines under 4 completions.....
using this method.....assuming lets say all of the lines were -110...a 3 teamer would pay 6 to 1.......
so say you dropped 100 on each PL....you would lose 3 and win 1....hence winning 400 for each 100 wagered on each parlay......
like i said many books do not allow this anymore...this hole was exposed years ago.....BEFORE 2008......mind you....2008 was the FIRST TIME IN NFL history...that a team won the coin toss and ELECTED TO DEFER....
this guy is right....but he didnt really explain it right.....this hole has been exposed years and years and very few books still allow it....bet365..still MIGHT...not sure....but you do series of 4- 3 team prop parlays....example....
(first parlay)
A.pitts to recieve opening kickoff
B. pitts to win toss
C. any 3rd leg....lets say hines ward OVER 4 completions
(2nd parlay)
A. pitts to recieve opening kickoff
B. pitts to win coin toss
c. hines under 4 completions
(3rd parlay)
A. GB to win toss
B. GB to recieve opening kickoff
C. Hines over 4 completions
(4th parlay)
A GB to win toss
B GB to recieve opening kickoff
C. hines under 4 completions.....
using this method.....assuming lets say all of the lines were -110...a 3 teamer would pay 6 to 1.......
so say you dropped 100 on each PL....you would lose 3 and win 1....hence winning 400 for each 100 wagered on each parlay......
like i said many books do not allow this anymore...this hole was exposed years ago.....BEFORE 2008......mind you....2008 was the FIRST TIME IN NFL history...that a team won the coin toss and ELECTED TO DEFER....
I really like
Rodgers Attempts over 34. I have him in the 40's easy. This line to me is way off.
I see no way GB runs the ball with any authority. They will have to pass. If they are complete they keep going,if they are incomplete clock stops and they may get another set of downs. If Pitt gets way up, GB throws. If GB gets way up, they will still need to throw some to keep em honest.
I really love this bet
GL
Also, I looked up Warner in the bowl two years ago against the Steelers, over
and Manning last year was over this also.
Brees and Brady also over this this year.
Finally, they will play this one to the end and maybe even OT (first one)
all to the over
GL
Now thats a write up
I really like
Rodgers Attempts over 34. I have him in the 40's easy. This line to me is way off.
I see no way GB runs the ball with any authority. They will have to pass. If they are complete they keep going,if they are incomplete clock stops and they may get another set of downs. If Pitt gets way up, GB throws. If GB gets way up, they will still need to throw some to keep em honest.
I really love this bet
GL
Also, I looked up Warner in the bowl two years ago against the Steelers, over
and Manning last year was over this also.
Brees and Brady also over this this year.
Finally, they will play this one to the end and maybe even OT (first one)
all to the over
GL
Now thats a write up
For the simple facts that:
1) GB allows 4.7ypc to opposing rushers, something PITT is CERTAIN to exploit and exploit very well
2) PITT C Pouncey is basically "out" and Legursky is more effective as a run-blocker than a pass-blocker, ergo MORE ground-game emphasis
3) PITT will surely wish to shorten the game/spin the clock in an effort to limit ARodg's opportunities/avoid a "shoot-out", and they will do this via the run imo
4) Mendenhall is PRECISELY the type of physical, downhill-runner, who gets gobs of yardage AFTER contact, that Green Bay has had trouble with
5) I expect PITT to run bc I expect them to have the LEAD throughout the majority of the contest
...I expect Mendenhall's carry total to be Over 19.5 for the game, perhaps as early as late in the 3rdQ frankly... Mendy goin' Over 75.5 yards is another prop I would feel very comfortable wagering on btw
GL
For the simple facts that:
1) GB allows 4.7ypc to opposing rushers, something PITT is CERTAIN to exploit and exploit very well
2) PITT C Pouncey is basically "out" and Legursky is more effective as a run-blocker than a pass-blocker, ergo MORE ground-game emphasis
3) PITT will surely wish to shorten the game/spin the clock in an effort to limit ARodg's opportunities/avoid a "shoot-out", and they will do this via the run imo
4) Mendenhall is PRECISELY the type of physical, downhill-runner, who gets gobs of yardage AFTER contact, that Green Bay has had trouble with
5) I expect PITT to run bc I expect them to have the LEAD throughout the majority of the contest
...I expect Mendenhall's carry total to be Over 19.5 for the game, perhaps as early as late in the 3rdQ frankly... Mendy goin' Over 75.5 yards is another prop I would feel very comfortable wagering on btw
GL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.