Yes you did take Pitt +2.5 in the contest, but not sure that proves anything since that was your only option.
Since the ML was not available in the contest, had it been available we don't know what you would have taken so just because you took the only option available to you does not prove anything.
You garaunteed a win, then said by 2 touchdowns and then oddly claimed to have not taken the ML, which you said at the end of the game.
Certainly you can see the fishyness of that, and again not trying to bust your butt just being honest with you.
Yes you did take Pitt +2.5 in the contest, but not sure that proves anything since that was your only option.
Since the ML was not available in the contest, had it been available we don't know what you would have taken so just because you took the only option available to you does not prove anything.
You garaunteed a win, then said by 2 touchdowns and then oddly claimed to have not taken the ML, which you said at the end of the game.
Certainly you can see the fishyness of that, and again not trying to bust your butt just being honest with you.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.