All Forums | NFL Betting

Stop crying

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 912
Posts: 32
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 5363
Posted: #1

The INT happened BEFORE Gronk got raped by the LB. Therefore, no PI. It's that simple

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #2
the int happened because GRONK couldn't get to the ball he was faceguarded

what part of that don't you understand
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #3
WHo cares about the PI....what about the fact that 20yds down the field he was being bear-hugged???  Thats not holding or illegal contact??
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 127
Posted: #4

Once the Carolina player who picked it, got position in front of Gronk, he had no play on it.  Ball was already in the air and badly underthrown. 

I agree that Gronk could have made the play if the Carolina player had not been there to pick it but the Carolina player had position before the faceguarding happened.

No chance with the position of the defender and ball being underthrown 3-4 yds that Gronk could catch that ball.  No chance.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 5363
Posted: #5
Gronk was 5 yards behind the ball. He should have stopped running. The ball was intercepted no were near Gronk. He kept running out of the endzone
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 154391
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

The INT happened BEFORE Gronk got raped by the LB. Therefore, no PI. It's that simple




What do you call an Eternal Optimist? An accordion with a beeper!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 157
Posted: #7
Bear hugged hahaha, wake up man and watch the play he never holds or grabs him. Let the players decide the game, gronk had 0% chance go to bed
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2004
Posts: 154391
Posted: #8
I'll say it again there was a Flag Thrown but the INT negated the Flag

If there was No INT there would be a Penalty
What do you call an Eternal Optimist? An accordion with a beeper!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 5363
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by Macwestie1:

I'll say it again there was a Flag Thrown but the INT negated the Flag

If there was No INT there would be a Penalty
Only a few people understands this. You and me only.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 38
Posted: #10
haha suck it up it's the NFL what did u expect
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 614
Posted: #11
Frenking Rigged,Bs... part of the game... now move on... sorry for all the losers..
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #12

Quote Originally Posted by Macwestie1:

I'll say it again there was a Flag Thrown but the INT negated the Flag

If there was No INT there would be a Penalty

 

Ive seen plenty of INTs every single week get flagged for PI

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 2723
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by Macwestie1:

I'll say it again there was a Flag Thrown but the INT negated the Flag

If there was No INT there would be a Penalty
Thank u!!!!!!!! They just had a ref on both espn an nfl network say the same thing sort of lol . But they said the ball was thrown short so deemed un catchable by the wr befor the flag was thrown . 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 5363
Posted: #14
These people act like they have NEVER seen a flag picked-up after a call. It happens in every game
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 6351
Posted: #15
https://twitter.com/NFL_Memes/status/390249541376958465
Let's go Darwin
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 487
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by whatsupknight:

Once the Carolina player who picked it, got position in front of Gronk, he had no play on it.  Ball was already in the air and badly underthrown. 

I agree that Gronk could have made the play if the Carolina player had not been there to pick it but the Carolina player had position before the faceguarding happened.

No chance with the position of the defender and ball being underthrown 3-4 yds that Gronk could catch that ball.  No chance.

 These guys do not understand this for some odd reason!!! I watched enough football in my life to clearly see this ball was gon get intercepted w/ or w/out the hold!!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 3989
Posted: #17
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2807
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

Only a few people understands this. You and me only.


So what corners should do now is commit PI all the time and as long as they get the int its cool no flag? And loll.ol to the guy saying he didn't touch grok he basically raped him
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by dcmc34f:

Gronk was 5 yards behind the ball. He should have stopped running. The ball was intercepted no were near Gronk. He kept running out of the endzone


He was 5 yards behind the ball because he was being faceguarded, meaning he couldn't cut because the defensive back was just looking at him and pancaking him without any interest in the throw whatsoever

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #20
the play WAS to Gronk and Gronk couldn't cut because he was faceguarded and really it's that simple.  blown call
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 2142
Posted: #21
I love this. Soooooo many posters crying about the play.  Really?  Good/bad calls are made every single game.  If New Eng didn't suckass so bad tonight...they wouldn't have needed to score a TD on the last play of the game. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by Zman55:



So what corners should do now is commit PI all the time and as long as they get the int its cool no flag? And loll.ol to the guy saying he didn't touch grok he basically raped him

 

Exactly.....dumbest comment by these people....5+ times a week a flag is thrown on an INT for PI

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #23
I thought overall NE outplayed Carolina, the fumble didn't help, they gave up a minimum 3 points
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2807
Posted: #24
Bud don't bother these guys bet the panthers and just want to make themselves feel like they are the man... But a real man says yes that was a flag they threw the flag how do you pick it up??? 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2807
Posted: #25
Panthers didn't really look impressive to me saints should roll these bums cam is overrated and missed to many easy throws and his body language is terrible if that team goes on a losing streak there will be an implosion 
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.