Hey Silly, continue to love your work. I have a question for you about capping stuff that is not really relate-able to numbers.
I used the method you laid for the StL - SF game to cap all the games today. The NYG-Was game produced a over/under total that was a more than 10 point variance from the Vegas line. Seems a no-brainer. So, I bet it the over.
There has been 6 (SIX) turnovers in that game. Obviously, this killed the over. Huge, clock-killing drives, capped by ints and fumbles. How do you factor in t/o's in your capping? Based on the RPI system you devised this should have worked and based on the number of times these two have been in the red-zone it should be easily over.
Lastly, the Redskins have also had 2 (TWO) touchdowns overturned by penalty - something else I am not sure you can cap for.
Just looking for some input from the master. Thanks.
0
Hey Silly, continue to love your work. I have a question for you about capping stuff that is not really relate-able to numbers.
I used the method you laid for the StL - SF game to cap all the games today. The NYG-Was game produced a over/under total that was a more than 10 point variance from the Vegas line. Seems a no-brainer. So, I bet it the over.
There has been 6 (SIX) turnovers in that game. Obviously, this killed the over. Huge, clock-killing drives, capped by ints and fumbles. How do you factor in t/o's in your capping? Based on the RPI system you devised this should have worked and based on the number of times these two have been in the red-zone it should be easily over.
Lastly, the Redskins have also had 2 (TWO) touchdowns overturned by penalty - something else I am not sure you can cap for.
Just looking for some input from the master. Thanks.
Hey Silly, continue to love your work. I have a question for you about capping stuff that is not really relate-able to numbers.
I used the method you laid for the StL - SF game to cap all the games today. The NYG-Was game produced a over/under total that was a more than 10 point variance from the Vegas line. Seems a no-brainer. So, I bet it the over.
There has been 6 (SIX) turnovers in that game. Obviously, this killed the over. Huge, clock-killing drives, capped by ints and fumbles. How do you factor in t/o's in your capping? Based on the RPI system you devised this should have worked and based on the number of times these two have been in the red-zone it should be easily over.
Lastly, the Redskins have also had 2 (TWO) touchdowns overturned by penalty - something else I am not sure you can cap for.
Just looking for some input from the master. Thanks.
hey man dont be disrespectful asking a question at the wrong time, ok? thats pretty messed up...no one cares about your questions.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigTenWatto:
Hey Silly, continue to love your work. I have a question for you about capping stuff that is not really relate-able to numbers.
I used the method you laid for the StL - SF game to cap all the games today. The NYG-Was game produced a over/under total that was a more than 10 point variance from the Vegas line. Seems a no-brainer. So, I bet it the over.
There has been 6 (SIX) turnovers in that game. Obviously, this killed the over. Huge, clock-killing drives, capped by ints and fumbles. How do you factor in t/o's in your capping? Based on the RPI system you devised this should have worked and based on the number of times these two have been in the red-zone it should be easily over.
Lastly, the Redskins have also had 2 (TWO) touchdowns overturned by penalty - something else I am not sure you can cap for.
Just looking for some input from the master. Thanks.
hey man dont be disrespectful asking a question at the wrong time, ok? thats pretty messed up...no one cares about your questions.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.