good work yesterday, and good luck today. How do you feel about pats/jets?
It seems to me that it depends on which Seahawks team shows up to play today. If the O line is working Forsett and Lynch get some runs and Hasselbeck gets time in the pocket then the Hawks will put up some points.
I'll take the chance. Hawks ML and +10.
I always repect your picks though. Nice work yesterday.
Thoughts on the later game?
It seems to me that it depends on which Seahawks team shows up to play today. If the O line is working Forsett and Lynch get some runs and Hasselbeck gets time in the pocket then the Hawks will put up some points.
I'll take the chance. Hawks ML and +10.
I always repect your picks though. Nice work yesterday.
Thoughts on the later game?
It seems to me that it depends on which Seahawks team shows up to play today. If the O line is working Forsett and Lynch get some runs and Hasselbeck gets time in the pocket then the Hawks will put up some points.
I'll take the chance. Hawks ML and +10.
I always repect your picks though. Nice work yesterday.
Thoughts on the later game?
Thanks for the post man. I'm not a Bears fan and I absolutely despise Cutler but I'm playing the Bears today because of the mismatch at the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball. Seattle's offensive line will allow the Bears penetration all day long and it doesn't help that Seattle's left tackle is banged up. Chicago's offensive line isn't exactly stellar, however, Seattle is very undersized up front and teams have run on them with ease and I don't think the circumstance will be any different today. The Bears running game will take the pressure off Cutler throwing the ball downfield and making his typical three to four huge mistakes in a ballgame. In fact, I think this is the type of game that allows Cutler to be effecient and manage the game with relative ease. Seattle has an older kicker with very weak leg strength so the special teams advantage certainly goes to Chicago with obvious respect to Hester as well. Last week, I really liked Seattle's matchup against New Orleans because the Saints didn't have a running game. But the Bears running game today will open up playaction giving the Bears a balanced offensive attack. From Seattle's offensive standpoint, I'm trying to figure out how they will score. I don't trust Seattle's QB situation to keep Seattle in the game and I really believe Seattle will have a difficult time running the ball.
I see a lot of cappers taking the over in this game but I am strongly leaning toward the under for the game and the under with Seattle's team total. Bol
It seems to me that it depends on which Seahawks team shows up to play today. If the O line is working Forsett and Lynch get some runs and Hasselbeck gets time in the pocket then the Hawks will put up some points.
I'll take the chance. Hawks ML and +10.
I always repect your picks though. Nice work yesterday.
Thoughts on the later game?
Thanks for the post man. I'm not a Bears fan and I absolutely despise Cutler but I'm playing the Bears today because of the mismatch at the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball. Seattle's offensive line will allow the Bears penetration all day long and it doesn't help that Seattle's left tackle is banged up. Chicago's offensive line isn't exactly stellar, however, Seattle is very undersized up front and teams have run on them with ease and I don't think the circumstance will be any different today. The Bears running game will take the pressure off Cutler throwing the ball downfield and making his typical three to four huge mistakes in a ballgame. In fact, I think this is the type of game that allows Cutler to be effecient and manage the game with relative ease. Seattle has an older kicker with very weak leg strength so the special teams advantage certainly goes to Chicago with obvious respect to Hester as well. Last week, I really liked Seattle's matchup against New Orleans because the Saints didn't have a running game. But the Bears running game today will open up playaction giving the Bears a balanced offensive attack. From Seattle's offensive standpoint, I'm trying to figure out how they will score. I don't trust Seattle's QB situation to keep Seattle in the game and I really believe Seattle will have a difficult time running the ball.
I see a lot of cappers taking the over in this game but I am strongly leaning toward the under for the game and the under with Seattle's team total. Bol
Like the Bears play !!
If that is Probert, did he play for the Blackhawks in the early 90's. I went to a few blackhawks games then w/ my college roomies, and was that guy a THUG, if so I remember they LOVED him in Chicago!!
Oh well, i do like the Bears play today. Good Luck on that one !! Last meeting = Cutler was just back of an injury, no Briggs, and Seattle was off a bye. I don't believe those wagering "at a glance" are factoring in those into their play. Also interesting is SEA's margin of defeat in their road contests, along w/ the interesting trends of winner SU covering ATS in Seattle's road games.
Hate to get off the point, and I won't argue w/ anyone, but the dumbwalrus does have a point. I've been on this site since 07' and here's an interesting stat that I've personally seen in that 5 year span.
KKtdoc = 2,500 posts........................maybe 2 or 3 w/ ANY INFO !!
D-Town = 5,000 posts.......................NO POSTS other than
fuk, if you don't have any useful information, why even post, I get tired of scrolling down from the fuking peace signs and shamrocks. I'd rather listen to a guy who's rarely posted, yet has some useful insight, than a 20K or 100K poster who doesn't offer shit. Just Sayin !! Had to get that one off my chest, it's VERY OBVIOUS.....
Like the Bears play !!
If that is Probert, did he play for the Blackhawks in the early 90's. I went to a few blackhawks games then w/ my college roomies, and was that guy a THUG, if so I remember they LOVED him in Chicago!!
Oh well, i do like the Bears play today. Good Luck on that one !! Last meeting = Cutler was just back of an injury, no Briggs, and Seattle was off a bye. I don't believe those wagering "at a glance" are factoring in those into their play. Also interesting is SEA's margin of defeat in their road contests, along w/ the interesting trends of winner SU covering ATS in Seattle's road games.
Hate to get off the point, and I won't argue w/ anyone, but the dumbwalrus does have a point. I've been on this site since 07' and here's an interesting stat that I've personally seen in that 5 year span.
KKtdoc = 2,500 posts........................maybe 2 or 3 w/ ANY INFO !!
D-Town = 5,000 posts.......................NO POSTS other than
fuk, if you don't have any useful information, why even post, I get tired of scrolling down from the fuking peace signs and shamrocks. I'd rather listen to a guy who's rarely posted, yet has some useful insight, than a 20K or 100K poster who doesn't offer shit. Just Sayin !! Had to get that one off my chest, it's VERY OBVIOUS.....
Like the Bears play !!
If that is Probert, did he play for the Blackhawks in the early 90's. I went to a few blackhawks games then w/ my college roomies, and was that guy a THUG, if so I remember they LOVED him in Chicago!!
Oh well, i do like the Bears play today. Good Luck on that one !! Last meeting = Cutler was just back of an injury, no Briggs, and Seattle was off a bye. I don't believe those wagering "at a glance" are factoring in those into their play. Also interesting is SEA's margin of defeat in their road contests, along w/ the interesting trends of winner SU covering ATS in Seattle's road games.
Hate to get off the point, and I won't argue w/ anyone, but the dumbwalrus does have a point. I've been on this site since 07' and here's an interesting stat that I've personally seen in that 5 year span.
KKtdoc = 2,500 posts........................maybe 2 or 3 w/ ANY INFO !!
D-Town = 5,000 posts.......................NO POSTS other than
fuk, if you don't have any useful information, why even post, I get tired of scrolling down from the fuking peace signs and shamrocks. I'd rather listen to a guy who's rarely posted, yet has some useful insight, than a 20K or 100K poster who doesn't offer shit. Just Sayin !! Had to get that one off my chest, it's VERY OBVIOUS.....
Yeah, that's my man, Probie. Baddest dude on the ice back in the day. Loved watching him beat the piss out of Domi, Wendell Clark, Marty McSorely, Stu Grimson, Dave Semenko and others.....those were the days
Bol today and throughout
Like the Bears play !!
If that is Probert, did he play for the Blackhawks in the early 90's. I went to a few blackhawks games then w/ my college roomies, and was that guy a THUG, if so I remember they LOVED him in Chicago!!
Oh well, i do like the Bears play today. Good Luck on that one !! Last meeting = Cutler was just back of an injury, no Briggs, and Seattle was off a bye. I don't believe those wagering "at a glance" are factoring in those into their play. Also interesting is SEA's margin of defeat in their road contests, along w/ the interesting trends of winner SU covering ATS in Seattle's road games.
Hate to get off the point, and I won't argue w/ anyone, but the dumbwalrus does have a point. I've been on this site since 07' and here's an interesting stat that I've personally seen in that 5 year span.
KKtdoc = 2,500 posts........................maybe 2 or 3 w/ ANY INFO !!
D-Town = 5,000 posts.......................NO POSTS other than
fuk, if you don't have any useful information, why even post, I get tired of scrolling down from the fuking peace signs and shamrocks. I'd rather listen to a guy who's rarely posted, yet has some useful insight, than a 20K or 100K poster who doesn't offer shit. Just Sayin !! Had to get that one off my chest, it's VERY OBVIOUS.....
Yeah, that's my man, Probie. Baddest dude on the ice back in the day. Loved watching him beat the piss out of Domi, Wendell Clark, Marty McSorely, Stu Grimson, Dave Semenko and others.....those were the days
Bol today and throughout
I'll check you out....
I'll check you out....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.