just took a look at futures today and already seeing some value reduction on the Ravens and Cowboys!
i got the Ravens 50/1 at William Hill on Jan 25th, and after one week it went to 40/1 and two weeks later it is now 30/1. Was actually kind of shocked that Ravens opened up that high based on one unlucky season. Cowboys opened at a steady 30/1 but now is 25/1 day after Super Bowl.
Westgate's future odds are terrible for almost all teams. Ravens are 30/1 there and 16/1 on the Cowboys.
You're always gonna see action on Dallas........not saying it's wrong, just that they're still a public team. I saw where GB has the easiest schedule next year......if they stay healthy & settle on a RB they could make a run. Getting in should be a given. I like Seattle.....again. They'll have an interesting off season as always but it looks as though they've found the heir apparent to Lynch, they won't make the Cary Williams mistake again, & there's no way the OL can be as bad as it was to start last season. They have a tough schedule again & other than seeing the 9er's twice they really don't have any cheapee's.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Digitalkarma:
just took a look at futures today and already seeing some value reduction on the Ravens and Cowboys!
i got the Ravens 50/1 at William Hill on Jan 25th, and after one week it went to 40/1 and two weeks later it is now 30/1. Was actually kind of shocked that Ravens opened up that high based on one unlucky season. Cowboys opened at a steady 30/1 but now is 25/1 day after Super Bowl.
Westgate's future odds are terrible for almost all teams. Ravens are 30/1 there and 16/1 on the Cowboys.
You're always gonna see action on Dallas........not saying it's wrong, just that they're still a public team. I saw where GB has the easiest schedule next year......if they stay healthy & settle on a RB they could make a run. Getting in should be a given. I like Seattle.....again. They'll have an interesting off season as always but it looks as though they've found the heir apparent to Lynch, they won't make the Cary Williams mistake again, & there's no way the OL can be as bad as it was to start last season. They have a tough schedule again & other than seeing the 9er's twice they really don't have any cheapee's.
Agree w/ most of your Ravens predictions, they can only go up from 2015. They had the most road games of any team in the first 7 weeks(5 away). An unfortunate schedule that was also the toughest SOS schedule for the first half of the season.
Do you guys have any concerns about Flacco's knee? We'll have to see how he steps up in the pocket in preseason.
Forsett's age, and having an acl injury at that age?
Another concern I have is that Marc Trestman historically has a bad year 2. The AFC North is a defensive division. Each coordinator seen that offense twice last year.
Good early talk everyone
0
@DK and @suuma
Agree w/ most of your Ravens predictions, they can only go up from 2015. They had the most road games of any team in the first 7 weeks(5 away). An unfortunate schedule that was also the toughest SOS schedule for the first half of the season.
Do you guys have any concerns about Flacco's knee? We'll have to see how he steps up in the pocket in preseason.
Forsett's age, and having an acl injury at that age?
Another concern I have is that Marc Trestman historically has a bad year 2. The AFC North is a defensive division. Each coordinator seen that offense twice last year.
Aside from the usual suspects and perennial losers that you can dismiss straight away (JAC, CLE, OAK, MIA, etc.) you can downright dismiss these two notable teams:
DALLAS & NEW ENGLAND
Neither of them reaches the SB, much less wins it.
You heard it HERE first.
While everyone else in this thread makes predictions on who will be IN the SB (yannno, kinda like what the thread was intended for) you go and predict who will NOT be in the SB.
Since you already know all the outcomes of the games which have yet to be played, please pick the 2 teams that will play in the big game.
Just name the teams, no need to write a 10 page dissertation on your beliefs and opinions, sans any facts, as you tend to do.
Tell all us sheep who will play in the next SB.
I'm sure next year someone will bump this thread because of your prediction, and it will not be you
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by DRIBBLE4LIFE:
Aside from the usual suspects and perennial losers that you can dismiss straight away (JAC, CLE, OAK, MIA, etc.) you can downright dismiss these two notable teams:
DALLAS & NEW ENGLAND
Neither of them reaches the SB, much less wins it.
You heard it HERE first.
While everyone else in this thread makes predictions on who will be IN the SB (yannno, kinda like what the thread was intended for) you go and predict who will NOT be in the SB.
Since you already know all the outcomes of the games which have yet to be played, please pick the 2 teams that will play in the big game.
Just name the teams, no need to write a 10 page dissertation on your beliefs and opinions, sans any facts, as you tend to do.
Tell all us sheep who will play in the next SB.
I'm sure next year someone will bump this thread because of your prediction, and it will not be you
When I say world events, think NE Patriots SB wins and see the correlation between USA going to war almost simultaneously. I swear I am going to start charging guys for my wisdom.
Dribble, do you mind if I ask how old you are?
Serious question.
Your conspiracy theories are just so far out there, IMO, that I'm curious as to who you are and what makes you think what you do.
What state do you reside in? (I'm assuming you are in the U.S.)
Did you go to (or are you currently in) college? If so, which?
I'm not stalking. I'm genuinely interested in how your beliefs have been developed.
If you don't care to answer, I understand
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by DRIBBLE4LIFE:
When I say world events, think NE Patriots SB wins and see the correlation between USA going to war almost simultaneously. I swear I am going to start charging guys for my wisdom.
Dribble, do you mind if I ask how old you are?
Serious question.
Your conspiracy theories are just so far out there, IMO, that I'm curious as to who you are and what makes you think what you do.
What state do you reside in? (I'm assuming you are in the U.S.)
Did you go to (or are you currently in) college? If so, which?
I'm not stalking. I'm genuinely interested in how your beliefs have been developed.
BTW, many lined up for the chance to bump my thread when Carolina won the SB. How'd that work out for ya ? Yeah, I know.....EVERYONE was on Denver, right ? You trolls get old quick.
I can't speak for "everyone" but I know that I was on Denver +5.5, plus on the ML, and I posted such right here on Covers.
Also, most reports out of Vegas state that all the late money came in on Denver, enough so that it was close to evening out the action on the game.
MGM Resorts VP of race and sports Jay Rood is seeing different action at his 10 books across the strip.
"It's been all Broncos since yesterday -- our position has completely changed. We need the Panthers now."
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by DRIBBLE4LIFE:
BTW, many lined up for the chance to bump my thread when Carolina won the SB. How'd that work out for ya ? Yeah, I know.....EVERYONE was on Denver, right ? You trolls get old quick.
I can't speak for "everyone" but I know that I was on Denver +5.5, plus on the ML, and I posted such right here on Covers.
Also, most reports out of Vegas state that all the late money came in on Denver, enough so that it was close to evening out the action on the game.
MGM Resorts VP of race and sports Jay Rood is seeing different action at his 10 books across the strip.
"It's been all Broncos since yesterday -- our position has completely changed. We need the Panthers now."
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.