Suuma... how do you feel about a Patriots vs Packers Super Bowl next year??......Rodgers vs Brady....nice little story.....Gisesle vs Olivia Munn.....would be a nice side show....
0
Suuma... how do you feel about a Patriots vs Packers Super Bowl next year??......Rodgers vs Brady....nice little story.....Gisesle vs Olivia Munn.....would be a nice side show....
Suuma how do you see the Rams next year? They D looked scary at some point
The Rams are one of those teams I don't have the best read on - probably because I generally didn't follow that division as much as other ones this past season. But I like to give my opinion:
The Rams finished 6-10 and there was a stretch during the season in which they looked mighty on defense. I think that stretch is a bit overrated. They caught the Broncos on their third road game in a row and in addition, the Broncos lost two receivers during that game when I remember right (I had Denver). They won 52-0 against the Raiders at home - right after the Raiders won their first game since one year on a Thursday night prime time game - it was a clear letdown spot for the road team. Another shutout win against a Redskins team that fell apart in those weeks and threw two interceptions within the St.Louis red zone. So overall, that stretch was benefited by a lot of good situations.
When you look at the Rams season as a whole, they lost almost every of their 10 games in an easy way. Of their 6 wins, three have come through the situations described above, and the other three have been close ones within a FG - fake punt return against Seattle, last-minute FG against Tampa Bay and a win at San Francisco in which Colin Kaepernick fumbled the ball on the STL goal line on the last play - game set match.
Instead of 6-10, the Rams could rather be 4-12 and no one could call them "underrated". They had the 24th best defense, conceded a lot of sacks and their offense is very questionable. They got many construction zones and I don't believe they have enough draft picks and cap space to form a team that can win more games than this season.
0
Quote Originally Posted by powerbalance:
Suuma how do you see the Rams next year? They D looked scary at some point
The Rams are one of those teams I don't have the best read on - probably because I generally didn't follow that division as much as other ones this past season. But I like to give my opinion:
The Rams finished 6-10 and there was a stretch during the season in which they looked mighty on defense. I think that stretch is a bit overrated. They caught the Broncos on their third road game in a row and in addition, the Broncos lost two receivers during that game when I remember right (I had Denver). They won 52-0 against the Raiders at home - right after the Raiders won their first game since one year on a Thursday night prime time game - it was a clear letdown spot for the road team. Another shutout win against a Redskins team that fell apart in those weeks and threw two interceptions within the St.Louis red zone. So overall, that stretch was benefited by a lot of good situations.
When you look at the Rams season as a whole, they lost almost every of their 10 games in an easy way. Of their 6 wins, three have come through the situations described above, and the other three have been close ones within a FG - fake punt return against Seattle, last-minute FG against Tampa Bay and a win at San Francisco in which Colin Kaepernick fumbled the ball on the STL goal line on the last play - game set match.
Instead of 6-10, the Rams could rather be 4-12 and no one could call them "underrated". They had the 24th best defense, conceded a lot of sacks and their offense is very questionable. They got many construction zones and I don't believe they have enough draft picks and cap space to form a team that can win more games than this season.
The Rams are one of those teams I don't have the best read on - probably because I generally didn't follow that division as much as other ones this past season. But I like to give my opinion:
The Rams finished 6-10 and there was a stretch during the season in which they looked mighty on defense. I think that stretch is a bit overrated. They caught the Broncos on their third road game in a row and in addition, the Broncos lost two receivers during that game when I remember right (I had Denver). They won 52-0 against the Raiders at home - right after the Raiders won their first game since one year on a Thursday night prime time game - it was a clear letdown spot for the road team. Another shutout win against a Redskins team that fell apart in those weeks and threw two interceptions within the St.Louis red zone. So overall, that stretch was benefited by a lot of good situations.
When you look at the Rams season as a whole, they lost almost every of their 10 games in an easy way. Of their 6 wins, three have come through the situations described above, and the other three have been close ones within a FG - fake punt return against Seattle, last-minute FG against Tampa Bay and a win at San Francisco in which Colin Kaepernick fumbled the ball on the STL goal line on the last play - game set match.
Instead of 6-10, the Rams could rather be 4-12 and no one could call them "underrated". They had the 24th best defense, conceded a lot of sacks and their offense is very questionable. They got many construction zones and I don't believe they have enough draft picks and cap space to form a team that can win more games than this season.
Thanx for sharing. Nevertheless a team to pay attention if their D can step up constantly
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
The Rams are one of those teams I don't have the best read on - probably because I generally didn't follow that division as much as other ones this past season. But I like to give my opinion:
The Rams finished 6-10 and there was a stretch during the season in which they looked mighty on defense. I think that stretch is a bit overrated. They caught the Broncos on their third road game in a row and in addition, the Broncos lost two receivers during that game when I remember right (I had Denver). They won 52-0 against the Raiders at home - right after the Raiders won their first game since one year on a Thursday night prime time game - it was a clear letdown spot for the road team. Another shutout win against a Redskins team that fell apart in those weeks and threw two interceptions within the St.Louis red zone. So overall, that stretch was benefited by a lot of good situations.
When you look at the Rams season as a whole, they lost almost every of their 10 games in an easy way. Of their 6 wins, three have come through the situations described above, and the other three have been close ones within a FG - fake punt return against Seattle, last-minute FG against Tampa Bay and a win at San Francisco in which Colin Kaepernick fumbled the ball on the STL goal line on the last play - game set match.
Instead of 6-10, the Rams could rather be 4-12 and no one could call them "underrated". They had the 24th best defense, conceded a lot of sacks and their offense is very questionable. They got many construction zones and I don't believe they have enough draft picks and cap space to form a team that can win more games than this season.
Thanx for sharing. Nevertheless a team to pay attention if their D can step up constantly
there's also no such thing as underachieving. everyone always achieves exactly what they are able to--no more and no less. there, that should help you, suuma.
0
there's also no such thing as underachieving. everyone always achieves exactly what they are able to--no more and no less. there, that should help you, suuma.
there's also no such thing as underachieving. everyone always achieves exactly what they are able to--no more and no less. there, that should help you, suuma.
If that's true, betting would be much easier.
0
Quote Originally Posted by smarterthanyou:
there's also no such thing as underachieving. everyone always achieves exactly what they are able to--no more and no less. there, that should help you, suuma.
Pats go deep, but lose inthe AFC Championship game..,AT HOME! in 2015. Not sure who goes though for either the AFC or NFC.
no integrity ot the sport- everything is fixed as evidenced by the Seahakks throwing the game in January, so it only really depends on what the line is out of Vegas, and whether or not they need to call a fix.
0
Quote Originally Posted by FinJerry:
Pats go deep, but lose inthe AFC Championship game..,AT HOME! in 2015. Not sure who goes though for either the AFC or NFC.
no integrity ot the sport- everything is fixed as evidenced by the Seahakks throwing the game in January, so it only really depends on what the line is out of Vegas, and whether or not they need to call a fix.
no integrity ot the sport- everything is fixed as evidenced by the Seahakks throwing the game in January, so it only really depends on what the line is out of Vegas, and whether or not they need to call a fix.
Good story
0
Quote Originally Posted by FinJerry:
no integrity ot the sport- everything is fixed as evidenced by the Seahakks throwing the game in January, so it only really depends on what the line is out of Vegas, and whether or not they need to call a fix.
Suuma, will the Jets draft Mariota at 6 if he is still there?
At this point, I think there is no possibility. It's just a mix of too less value and risk for the Jets. The best case scenario is to trade down with the Eagles if Mariota is available. I've read that Colin Kaepernick is going to be traded. I would love Maccagnan to take a shot. Many people on here think he is "Crapernick" but I see potential. Give him a solid o-line and a good receiving corps and he will be fine. Kaepernick + BMarsh, EDecker, JKerley and Amaro/Cumberland plus a few prospects the Jets already have (Enunwa, Evans, ..) - it's gonna be a good offense.
Even if they don't get CK, they will try to get a solid backup for Geno Smith. All in all, I can't see them taking Mariota.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lmb4321:
Suuma, will the Jets draft Mariota at 6 if he is still there?
At this point, I think there is no possibility. It's just a mix of too less value and risk for the Jets. The best case scenario is to trade down with the Eagles if Mariota is available. I've read that Colin Kaepernick is going to be traded. I would love Maccagnan to take a shot. Many people on here think he is "Crapernick" but I see potential. Give him a solid o-line and a good receiving corps and he will be fine. Kaepernick + BMarsh, EDecker, JKerley and Amaro/Cumberland plus a few prospects the Jets already have (Enunwa, Evans, ..) - it's gonna be a good offense.
Even if they don't get CK, they will try to get a solid backup for Geno Smith. All in all, I can't see them taking Mariota.
Looks like Colts will be making serious push to get to the Super Bowl. Eventually it'll be Andrew Luck's turn to join the big stage. That is what the NFL would want.
Seeing a Colts vs Seahawks Super Bowl or
Maybe two throwback teams like the Colts vs Packers for Super Bowl 50.
Putting some down on Colts 12/1 before the odds drop. Think they will have the best record in AFC and win 13 games..
Sip on that plus money honey!
0
Looks like Colts will be making serious push to get to the Super Bowl. Eventually it'll be Andrew Luck's turn to join the big stage. That is what the NFL would want.
Seeing a Colts vs Seahawks Super Bowl or
Maybe two throwback teams like the Colts vs Packers for Super Bowl 50.
Putting some down on Colts 12/1 before the odds drop. Think they will have the best record in AFC and win 13 games..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.