Neither the Sproles pass nor the Matthews pass traveled more than 26 yards in the air. I collect my own stats and am on the Eagles this week. I follow football, not teams. I live in Los Angeles so I saw two teams in training camp this year, the Cowboys and the Rams. This is why I pick my spots against the Rams, including this week with the Panthers -3. You can learn a lot about a team by seeing them practice, and let me tell you, the difference between the Cowboys and the Rams was night and day. Dak may be a game manager, but he also went 5 straight games with a passer rating of over 100 and Wentz is the definition of a game manager, they don't trust him to throw anything vertically and it shows. He's playing the role of Alex Smith and that's ok but let's not act like Wentz is going to throw his team back into any game when he can't even throw them to first downs to win a game up 10.
dude you are extremely wrong on them not trusting him to throw downfield. The Matthews pass was 54 yds with a perfect throw in the middle of two defenders.
He has had at least four 20+ "air yd" TD passes that were dropped, and they were perfect throws, not to mention the last throw of the Detroit game which was on the money, but Agholor didn't make a play for it. This is a much different offense than the old KC chief narrative that he is like Smith and a game manager. Doug P. is actually more innovative than Chip, and calls plays for Wentz to throw deep, just limited deep options. I understand if you're biased, but any football mind would completely disagree with you. Wentz is better than any rookie QB to date, and you'll see that throughout his career.
0
Quote Originally Posted by porcelainfist:
Neither the Sproles pass nor the Matthews pass traveled more than 26 yards in the air. I collect my own stats and am on the Eagles this week. I follow football, not teams. I live in Los Angeles so I saw two teams in training camp this year, the Cowboys and the Rams. This is why I pick my spots against the Rams, including this week with the Panthers -3. You can learn a lot about a team by seeing them practice, and let me tell you, the difference between the Cowboys and the Rams was night and day. Dak may be a game manager, but he also went 5 straight games with a passer rating of over 100 and Wentz is the definition of a game manager, they don't trust him to throw anything vertically and it shows. He's playing the role of Alex Smith and that's ok but let's not act like Wentz is going to throw his team back into any game when he can't even throw them to first downs to win a game up 10.
dude you are extremely wrong on them not trusting him to throw downfield. The Matthews pass was 54 yds with a perfect throw in the middle of two defenders.
He has had at least four 20+ "air yd" TD passes that were dropped, and they were perfect throws, not to mention the last throw of the Detroit game which was on the money, but Agholor didn't make a play for it. This is a much different offense than the old KC chief narrative that he is like Smith and a game manager. Doug P. is actually more innovative than Chip, and calls plays for Wentz to throw deep, just limited deep options. I understand if you're biased, but any football mind would completely disagree with you. Wentz is better than any rookie QB to date, and you'll see that throughout his career.
Suuma, you're again overvaluing end zone picks. I told you in week 6 before the Cowboys' Week 6 victory in Green Bay you were saying Cousins threw an egregious interception in the end zone, he didn't. He just threw an interception in the end Zone. It happens. Exactly like the Cousins interception where Barry Church read the route combo and left his man, so too did Hicks come off of his man, Witten, to cut off the route of his intended target Brice Butler.
We are on a gambling site, so acres matter. Ask me if I think Prescott is better thAn Romo, he's not and its not close. Ask me if he's better than WENTZ. Definitely. Wentz hasn't completed a pass of over 26 yards since week one. Didn't attempt a pass of over 20 yards.
Again, the point here is that this is a Cowboys team that without Romo last year went 1-11. Did they add a premier pass rusher? They didn't. A shutdown Corner? Nope. Same offensive line as last year.
People didn't listen to me when I told them Cowboys were close in every game but two last year, yet now all want to act like I'm wrong again and will continue to underestimate this team an this quarterback based on pure, forgive my word choice, ignorance and/or arrogance. I understand Eagles fans being bitter but winning games matters in sports gambling. I have won 6 games in the Supercontest with these Cowboys and I'll laugh every time the team against them is top 6 consensus.
I am not overvalueing end zone picks. It's about making decisions and ball placement in the red zone. And if any QB completes just 40% of his red zone passes and throws passes right into defenders despite playing behind the best OL in the NFL, it is margin for concern. If you have three options and take the worst one or throw the ball right into a defender, it is in fact an egregious interception or atleast an egregious interceptable pass.
Why do QBs with no receivers have to complete passes over 26 yards? Why do they have to attempt a pass over 20 yards? Is Prescott a better QB than Brady if he attempts more passes over 20 yards than him? According to your numbers, the Eagles beat the Steelers 34-3 without attempting a pass over 20 yards, so how much worth is the number of 20+ attempts? If Pederson goes for the 52yard FG on SNF, the Eagles have the #1 seed in the NFC right now and they cover the spread as it was well-deserved. And I couldn't care less because I had PHI +10.5 in a teaser.
0
Quote Originally Posted by porcelainfist:
Suuma, you're again overvaluing end zone picks. I told you in week 6 before the Cowboys' Week 6 victory in Green Bay you were saying Cousins threw an egregious interception in the end zone, he didn't. He just threw an interception in the end Zone. It happens. Exactly like the Cousins interception where Barry Church read the route combo and left his man, so too did Hicks come off of his man, Witten, to cut off the route of his intended target Brice Butler.
We are on a gambling site, so acres matter. Ask me if I think Prescott is better thAn Romo, he's not and its not close. Ask me if he's better than WENTZ. Definitely. Wentz hasn't completed a pass of over 26 yards since week one. Didn't attempt a pass of over 20 yards.
Again, the point here is that this is a Cowboys team that without Romo last year went 1-11. Did they add a premier pass rusher? They didn't. A shutdown Corner? Nope. Same offensive line as last year.
People didn't listen to me when I told them Cowboys were close in every game but two last year, yet now all want to act like I'm wrong again and will continue to underestimate this team an this quarterback based on pure, forgive my word choice, ignorance and/or arrogance. I understand Eagles fans being bitter but winning games matters in sports gambling. I have won 6 games in the Supercontest with these Cowboys and I'll laugh every time the team against them is top 6 consensus.
I am not overvalueing end zone picks. It's about making decisions and ball placement in the red zone. And if any QB completes just 40% of his red zone passes and throws passes right into defenders despite playing behind the best OL in the NFL, it is margin for concern. If you have three options and take the worst one or throw the ball right into a defender, it is in fact an egregious interception or atleast an egregious interceptable pass.
Why do QBs with no receivers have to complete passes over 26 yards? Why do they have to attempt a pass over 20 yards? Is Prescott a better QB than Brady if he attempts more passes over 20 yards than him? According to your numbers, the Eagles beat the Steelers 34-3 without attempting a pass over 20 yards, so how much worth is the number of 20+ attempts? If Pederson goes for the 52yard FG on SNF, the Eagles have the #1 seed in the NFC right now and they cover the spread as it was well-deserved. And I couldn't care less because I had PHI +10.5 in a teaser.
Agree with Contrarian, there shouldn't be any debate about whether Wentz is the better QB than Prescott after week 8. It's not close. Put Prescott on the Eagles and it would be a disaster.
0
Agree with Contrarian, there shouldn't be any debate about whether Wentz is the better QB than Prescott after week 8. It's not close. Put Prescott on the Eagles and it would be a disaster.
I am not overvalueing end zone picks. It's about making decisions and ball placement in the red zone. And if any QB completes just 40% of his red zone passes and throws passes right into defenders despite playing behind the best OL in the NFL, it is margin for concern. If you have three options and take the worst one or throw the ball right into a defender, it is in fact an egregious interception or atleast an egregious interceptable pass.
Why do QBs with no receivers have to complete passes over 26 yards? Why do they have to attempt a pass over 20 yards? Is Prescott a better QB than Brady if he attempts more passes over 20 yards than him? According to your numbers, the Eagles beat the Steelers 34-3 without attempting a pass over 20 yards, so how much worth is the number of 20+ attempts? If Pederson goes for the 52yard FG on SNF, the Eagles have the #1 seed in the NFC right now and they cover the spread as it was well-deserved. And I couldn't care less because I had PHI +10.5 in a teaser.
Nailed it, suuma.
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
I am not overvalueing end zone picks. It's about making decisions and ball placement in the red zone. And if any QB completes just 40% of his red zone passes and throws passes right into defenders despite playing behind the best OL in the NFL, it is margin for concern. If you have three options and take the worst one or throw the ball right into a defender, it is in fact an egregious interception or atleast an egregious interceptable pass.
Why do QBs with no receivers have to complete passes over 26 yards? Why do they have to attempt a pass over 20 yards? Is Prescott a better QB than Brady if he attempts more passes over 20 yards than him? According to your numbers, the Eagles beat the Steelers 34-3 without attempting a pass over 20 yards, so how much worth is the number of 20+ attempts? If Pederson goes for the 52yard FG on SNF, the Eagles have the #1 seed in the NFC right now and they cover the spread as it was well-deserved. And I couldn't care less because I had PHI +10.5 in a teaser.
i'm a big Wentz fan. I think the criticism that he doesn't throw downfield is wrong (for now) for two reasons. First, he gets blitzed a ton and even when not blitzed, the line isn't good enough to give him enough time to go deep downfield. When he does go deep, as others have said, it actually looks pretty good; it's just that his receivers drop a lot.
But now to the bad. in each loss, wentz had an opportunity to win the game either by orchestrating a drive with sufficient time left or by closing out the game. I understand that he is not getting help from receivers or rbs on those drives. But being 0-3 in those situations is ot encouraging, even if excusable.
So turning to dak, he has the o-line to give him time. He has the receivers to catch the ball and he has the rb to prop it all up. There is no comparison to the supporting cast of the eagles. The criticisms of dak are likewise on point: given all these advantages, his decision making and performances (like at the eagles game) can be highly questionable. But there's something to be said for making plays when it counts. For all of Dak's flaws in the eagles game, he led the comeback and he led the drive in OT that sealed it. Rodgers, Brady, Rothlesberger and Peyton have all had terrible games with poor stats and questionable decisions that they found a way to win when it counted.
At this time, it's too early to say that Wentz can't come out on top in these situations or that Dak is particularly good at doing so. But to date, in that lone category (albeit an important one), you have to give Dak the edge over Wentz.
0
i'm a big Wentz fan. I think the criticism that he doesn't throw downfield is wrong (for now) for two reasons. First, he gets blitzed a ton and even when not blitzed, the line isn't good enough to give him enough time to go deep downfield. When he does go deep, as others have said, it actually looks pretty good; it's just that his receivers drop a lot.
But now to the bad. in each loss, wentz had an opportunity to win the game either by orchestrating a drive with sufficient time left or by closing out the game. I understand that he is not getting help from receivers or rbs on those drives. But being 0-3 in those situations is ot encouraging, even if excusable.
So turning to dak, he has the o-line to give him time. He has the receivers to catch the ball and he has the rb to prop it all up. There is no comparison to the supporting cast of the eagles. The criticisms of dak are likewise on point: given all these advantages, his decision making and performances (like at the eagles game) can be highly questionable. But there's something to be said for making plays when it counts. For all of Dak's flaws in the eagles game, he led the comeback and he led the drive in OT that sealed it. Rodgers, Brady, Rothlesberger and Peyton have all had terrible games with poor stats and questionable decisions that they found a way to win when it counted.
At this time, it's too early to say that Wentz can't come out on top in these situations or that Dak is particularly good at doing so. But to date, in that lone category (albeit an important one), you have to give Dak the edge over Wentz.
If Dak runs into a team that can both stop the run and the deep ball (tall order of course) he'll be exposed. He isn't accurate on short passes and he doesn't make the decision to take them quickly. Please go watch him vs Bama, when he had penetration up the middle from the defense he didn't know what to do and threw picks. After this week I'll be happy to go against the Cowboys especially in non div games.
Despite being from Philly I'm not really a huge Eagles fan because I only care about picking winners ATS, but Dak is not anywhere near Wentz in terms of what you want in an NFL QB. He's not a good decision maker both on and off the field (had a DUI and also got beat up while drinking in a parking lot in the college off as season)
With his OL and run game he is rarely in 3rd and long and gets plenty of time to throw. Beasley, Dez, Williams and Witten to throw to. He's good because the team is loaded on offense around him. He didn't fall to the 3rd round because scouts are dumb this isn't a Russ Wilson type deal.
0
If Dak runs into a team that can both stop the run and the deep ball (tall order of course) he'll be exposed. He isn't accurate on short passes and he doesn't make the decision to take them quickly. Please go watch him vs Bama, when he had penetration up the middle from the defense he didn't know what to do and threw picks. After this week I'll be happy to go against the Cowboys especially in non div games.
Despite being from Philly I'm not really a huge Eagles fan because I only care about picking winners ATS, but Dak is not anywhere near Wentz in terms of what you want in an NFL QB. He's not a good decision maker both on and off the field (had a DUI and also got beat up while drinking in a parking lot in the college off as season)
With his OL and run game he is rarely in 3rd and long and gets plenty of time to throw. Beasley, Dez, Williams and Witten to throw to. He's good because the team is loaded on offense around him. He didn't fall to the 3rd round because scouts are dumb this isn't a Russ Wilson type deal.
Neither the Sproles pass nor the Matthews pass traveled more than 26 yards in the air. I collect my own stats and am on the Eagles this week. I follow football, not teams. I live in Los Angeles so I saw two teams in training camp this year, the Cowboys and the Rams. This is why I pick my spots against the Rams, including this week with the Panthers -3. You can learn a lot about a team by seeing them practice, and let me tell you, the difference between the Cowboys and the Rams was night and day. Dak may be a game manager, but he also went 5 straight games with a passer rating of over 100 and Wentz is the definition of a game manager, they don't trust him to throw anything vertically and it shows. He's playing the role of Alex Smith and that's ok but let's not act like Wentz is going to throw his team back into any game when he can't even throw them to first downs to win a game up 10.
Wentz can throw deep, the problem is there oline right now, starting a fifth rounder, no lane Johnson, another lineman was playing on one leg sunday night. He's not throw deep because they don't want to him get sacked.
0
Quote Originally Posted by porcelainfist:
Neither the Sproles pass nor the Matthews pass traveled more than 26 yards in the air. I collect my own stats and am on the Eagles this week. I follow football, not teams. I live in Los Angeles so I saw two teams in training camp this year, the Cowboys and the Rams. This is why I pick my spots against the Rams, including this week with the Panthers -3. You can learn a lot about a team by seeing them practice, and let me tell you, the difference between the Cowboys and the Rams was night and day. Dak may be a game manager, but he also went 5 straight games with a passer rating of over 100 and Wentz is the definition of a game manager, they don't trust him to throw anything vertically and it shows. He's playing the role of Alex Smith and that's ok but let's not act like Wentz is going to throw his team back into any game when he can't even throw them to first downs to win a game up 10.
Wentz can throw deep, the problem is there oline right now, starting a fifth rounder, no lane Johnson, another lineman was playing on one leg sunday night. He's not throw deep because they don't want to him get sacked.
Agree with Contrarian, there shouldn't be any debate about whether Wentz is the better QB than Prescott after week 8. It's not close. Put Prescott on the Eagles and it would be a disaster.
Well said
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
Agree with Contrarian, there shouldn't be any debate about whether Wentz is the better QB than Prescott after week 8. It's not close. Put Prescott on the Eagles and it would be a disaster.
Wentz can throw deep, the problem is there oline right now, starting a fifth rounder, no lane Johnson, another lineman was playing on one leg sunday night. He's not throw deep because they don't want to him get sacked.
Vaitai has actually been pretty good filling in for Lane since the Washington game (his first NFL game). Barbre was replaced by Wisniewski due to a hammy. Give Wentz time to throw and he's deadly.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lordbettington:
Wentz can throw deep, the problem is there oline right now, starting a fifth rounder, no lane Johnson, another lineman was playing on one leg sunday night. He's not throw deep because they don't want to him get sacked.
Vaitai has actually been pretty good filling in for Lane since the Washington game (his first NFL game). Barbre was replaced by Wisniewski due to a hammy. Give Wentz time to throw and he's deadly.
Vaitai has actually been pretty good filling in for Lane since the Washington game (his first NFL game). Barbre was replaced by Wisniewski due to a hammy. Give Wentz time to throw and he's deadly.
Big v has improved. I think they will throw deep more in the coming weeks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Contrarian21:
Vaitai has actually been pretty good filling in for Lane since the Washington game (his first NFL game). Barbre was replaced by Wisniewski due to a hammy. Give Wentz time to throw and he's deadly.
Big v has improved. I think they will throw deep more in the coming weeks.
All I hear are excuses as to WHY Wentz hasn't yet performed to the level of Prescott. When "decision making" is being used against a QB with two picks in 7 games you guys need your heads checked. I hear biased arguments not sound reasoning.
0
All I hear are excuses as to WHY Wentz hasn't yet performed to the level of Prescott. When "decision making" is being used against a QB with two picks in 7 games you guys need your heads checked. I hear biased arguments not sound reasoning.
All I hear are excuses as to WHY Wentz hasn't yet performed to the level of Prescott. When "decision making" is being used against a QB with two picks in 7 games you guys need your heads checked. I hear biased arguments not sound reasoning.
Thats pretty easy. 3 things....
1) Nothing was expected of Dak as he was thrown into the fire with Romo hurt....expectations breed disappointment
2) Dallas has the best O Line in the league
3) Dallas has a feature RB that can handle 25 carries....not 2 or 3 scat backs....
0
Quote Originally Posted by porcelainfist:
All I hear are excuses as to WHY Wentz hasn't yet performed to the level of Prescott. When "decision making" is being used against a QB with two picks in 7 games you guys need your heads checked. I hear biased arguments not sound reasoning.
Thats pretty easy. 3 things....
1) Nothing was expected of Dak as he was thrown into the fire with Romo hurt....expectations breed disappointment
2) Dallas has the best O Line in the league
3) Dallas has a feature RB that can handle 25 carries....not 2 or 3 scat backs....
1. if it were that simple, Dallas would have won more than 4 games last year.
2. If their O Line were so dominant, you would obviously have bet them against the Packers
3. What difference does supporting cast have to do with anything? You are all saying that Wentz is better than Prescott with zero facts to back it up, including a worse QB Rating.
YPA: Dak, 8.2... Wentz, 6.69.
In spite of this LARGE gap in Yards per attempt, Prescott is only .6 percentage points behind Wentz in completion percentage.
This is a show me league, if Wentz's team is that awful that he can't compete, so be it. But you can't use Prescott against Alabama as an argument, nor can you use the fictional matchup of Prescott against Denver.
What you can use is Prescott's current performance against Wentz's current performance. There is no comparison. Wentz loses.
0
1. if it were that simple, Dallas would have won more than 4 games last year.
2. If their O Line were so dominant, you would obviously have bet them against the Packers
3. What difference does supporting cast have to do with anything? You are all saying that Wentz is better than Prescott with zero facts to back it up, including a worse QB Rating.
YPA: Dak, 8.2... Wentz, 6.69.
In spite of this LARGE gap in Yards per attempt, Prescott is only .6 percentage points behind Wentz in completion percentage.
This is a show me league, if Wentz's team is that awful that he can't compete, so be it. But you can't use Prescott against Alabama as an argument, nor can you use the fictional matchup of Prescott against Denver.
What you can use is Prescott's current performance against Wentz's current performance. There is no comparison. Wentz loses.
1. if it were that simple, Dallas would have won more than 4 games last year.
2. If their O Line were so dominant, you would obviously have bet them against the Packers
3. What difference does supporting cast have to do with anything? You are all saying that Wentz is better than Prescott with zero facts to back it up, including a worse QB Rating.
YPA: Dak, 8.2... Wentz, 6.69.
In spite of this LARGE gap in Yards per attempt, Prescott is only .6 percentage points behind Wentz in completion percentage.
This is a show me league, if Wentz's team is that awful that he can't compete, so be it. But you can't use Prescott against Alabama as an argument, nor can you use the fictional matchup of Prescott against Denver.
What you can use is Prescott's current performance against Wentz's current performance. There is no comparison. Wentz loses.
I stopped reading after that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by porcelainfist:
1. if it were that simple, Dallas would have won more than 4 games last year.
2. If their O Line were so dominant, you would obviously have bet them against the Packers
3. What difference does supporting cast have to do with anything? You are all saying that Wentz is better than Prescott with zero facts to back it up, including a worse QB Rating.
YPA: Dak, 8.2... Wentz, 6.69.
In spite of this LARGE gap in Yards per attempt, Prescott is only .6 percentage points behind Wentz in completion percentage.
This is a show me league, if Wentz's team is that awful that he can't compete, so be it. But you can't use Prescott against Alabama as an argument, nor can you use the fictional matchup of Prescott against Denver.
What you can use is Prescott's current performance against Wentz's current performance. There is no comparison. Wentz loses.
Train, last I spoke to you this was what you had to say:
"Stop looking at those #'s and thinking you know something. The reason those teams have bad rushing numbers isnt simply because they cant run.....they have been down in most games resulting in them throwing by necessity....also, they have played GB, which account for 1/5 of their current stats (which is pretty hefty)....
If you think GB isnt going to stack the box and make Dak throw to Beasley and Williams you are going to be very disappointed on sunday....Dallas has ZERO deep threat and that is going to start catching up to them this week"
You were dead wrong. You are dead wrong again.
0
Train, last I spoke to you this was what you had to say:
"Stop looking at those #'s and thinking you know something. The reason those teams have bad rushing numbers isnt simply because they cant run.....they have been down in most games resulting in them throwing by necessity....also, they have played GB, which account for 1/5 of their current stats (which is pretty hefty)....
If you think GB isnt going to stack the box and make Dak throw to Beasley and Williams you are going to be very disappointed on sunday....Dallas has ZERO deep threat and that is going to start catching up to them this week"
I stopped reading after the 'what does supporting cast have to do with anything' bit.
Here's what it has to do with it: compare what happened when Wentz threw to Agholor in the red zone vs what happened when Dak threw to Dez on the tying TD. One cannot catch when the ball hits him in the hands, the other brings in the ball with a DB practically wearing his uniform.
You're making yourself look really clueless dude. No one agrees with you so I guess you must be a misundersood genius.
0
I stopped reading after the 'what does supporting cast have to do with anything' bit.
Here's what it has to do with it: compare what happened when Wentz threw to Agholor in the red zone vs what happened when Dak threw to Dez on the tying TD. One cannot catch when the ball hits him in the hands, the other brings in the ball with a DB practically wearing his uniform.
You're making yourself look really clueless dude. No one agrees with you so I guess you must be a misundersood genius.
Porcelainfist, with all due respect – you can’t be serious. Especially as the guy who explained numerous times on this forum why Tony Romo was always a good QB but never had a good supporting cast before 2014. The supporting cast (also coaches) is the single most important aspect when judging individual performances. You know that as well, you just try to make a case for Prescott. It’s interesting that you use yards per attempt when one of the best QBs of all time (Aaron Rodgers) ranks in the bottom-10 of YPA since 2015 because of his supporting cast.
I think at the point when someone says the supporting cast doesn’t make any difference, we just have to put this conversation on ice.
0
Porcelainfist, with all due respect – you can’t be serious. Especially as the guy who explained numerous times on this forum why Tony Romo was always a good QB but never had a good supporting cast before 2014. The supporting cast (also coaches) is the single most important aspect when judging individual performances. You know that as well, you just try to make a case for Prescott. It’s interesting that you use yards per attempt when one of the best QBs of all time (Aaron Rodgers) ranks in the bottom-10 of YPA since 2015 because of his supporting cast.
I think at the point when someone says the supporting cast doesn’t make any difference, we just have to put this conversation on ice.
ATL -3: Good writeup on the ATL falcons suuma and I agree with several of your key points. I think they will cover but since the spread is -4 in my bookie , I'll just play it safe and do 1unit on the ML.
SD -5: I disagree with you here. I think TN is not as bad of a team as they seem to be. They're schedule may have been cupcake but let's not discount their performance. They've had flashes of brilliance on offense. They've kept themselves in every game so far. Their defense has only allowed one meaningful second half TD to lose the lead all year (They've allowed five total, four of those were garbage points), and they've shown they can dominate when they win. All San Diego has shown me are 4q meltdowns. TN has the ability to keep this game close and I think they will.
BUF +7: This one's kinda iffy to me. I just never like betting against Seattle in CenturyLink field. With that being said, I'd lean towards Seattle here. When I picture how the game will go, I see the Bills running into all kinds of walls. Seahawks defense just tends to create all kinds of opportunities. If the Bills don't take care of the football in this game, I see the Seahawks running all over them.
Dak is a good qb. but i'd still take Romo over Dak. Unless there's something Dak can do that Romo can't. Romos experience will come handy later in the season and, dare i say it, the playoffs.
All your other picks I agree with. Lol.
0
ATL -3: Good writeup on the ATL falcons suuma and I agree with several of your key points. I think they will cover but since the spread is -4 in my bookie , I'll just play it safe and do 1unit on the ML.
SD -5: I disagree with you here. I think TN is not as bad of a team as they seem to be. They're schedule may have been cupcake but let's not discount their performance. They've had flashes of brilliance on offense. They've kept themselves in every game so far. Their defense has only allowed one meaningful second half TD to lose the lead all year (They've allowed five total, four of those were garbage points), and they've shown they can dominate when they win. All San Diego has shown me are 4q meltdowns. TN has the ability to keep this game close and I think they will.
BUF +7: This one's kinda iffy to me. I just never like betting against Seattle in CenturyLink field. With that being said, I'd lean towards Seattle here. When I picture how the game will go, I see the Bills running into all kinds of walls. Seahawks defense just tends to create all kinds of opportunities. If the Bills don't take care of the football in this game, I see the Seahawks running all over them.
Dak is a good qb. but i'd still take Romo over Dak. Unless there's something Dak can do that Romo can't. Romos experience will come handy later in the season and, dare i say it, the playoffs.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.