Got a weird feeling for tonight. I think the Pats care more about beating the Jets next week than the Colts for the third or fourth straight time. Looks like Pats but could be a backdoor cover.
0
Got a weird feeling for tonight. I think the Pats care more about beating the Jets next week than the Colts for the third or fourth straight time. Looks like Pats but could be a backdoor cover.
meanwhile that douche deluxe "fade or die" has about an 0-20 lifetime record here at covers...youve got a lot to learn from him,suuma....a lot to learn....if only you really knew how this whole entertainment league worked just imagine wat your record wud be like then??
0
...another winning week,thank you my man.
not bad for an "average capper"
meanwhile that douche deluxe "fade or die" has about an 0-20 lifetime record here at covers...youve got a lot to learn from him,suuma....a lot to learn....if only you really knew how this whole entertainment league worked just imagine wat your record wud be like then??
You're an idiot. 'Fading the public' and following imaginary sharps on 'line movement' is a long-term 50% capping strategy -- because you're making decisions on something that doesn't actually exist.
Don't tell someone who actually handicaps the game of football that they need to learn how to factor in non-existent elements.
I guarantee you've never tracked your public/sharp RLM results over the course of one or more seasons, because if you'd had you'd have discovered the 100% reliable ZERO effect it has on any long-term records.
Watching RLM movement and fading who you think 'the public' is on is the same as factoring in which star signs are in orbit on the night of your bets.
You're dead wrong bud.
The public of course does exist. Talk to any sportsbook manager and he will tell you it does (something you've clearly never done.)
And lines most certainly move off of sharp money.
Again, this is well documented in the sportsbooking world.
Now, to your larger point of FOLLOWING these things to make money?
Well, do such a thing over the long-term and it is a 50/50 proposition. Capping just can't be reduced to these things. I like to use them just as icing on the cake for my picks already capped.
But you can do some line reading (which works) and find out and access reliable sources where money came from.
You don't have any experience with this so I understand your why you are saying what saying.
Suuma.....a PRISTINE week of picks and I think you are well on your way to a 6-0 after MNF.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BetFriends:
You're an idiot. 'Fading the public' and following imaginary sharps on 'line movement' is a long-term 50% capping strategy -- because you're making decisions on something that doesn't actually exist.
Don't tell someone who actually handicaps the game of football that they need to learn how to factor in non-existent elements.
I guarantee you've never tracked your public/sharp RLM results over the course of one or more seasons, because if you'd had you'd have discovered the 100% reliable ZERO effect it has on any long-term records.
Watching RLM movement and fading who you think 'the public' is on is the same as factoring in which star signs are in orbit on the night of your bets.
You're dead wrong bud.
The public of course does exist. Talk to any sportsbook manager and he will tell you it does (something you've clearly never done.)
And lines most certainly move off of sharp money.
Again, this is well documented in the sportsbooking world.
Now, to your larger point of FOLLOWING these things to make money?
Well, do such a thing over the long-term and it is a 50/50 proposition. Capping just can't be reduced to these things. I like to use them just as icing on the cake for my picks already capped.
But you can do some line reading (which works) and find out and access reliable sources where money came from.
You don't have any experience with this so I understand your why you are saying what saying.
Suuma.....a PRISTINE week of picks and I think you are well on your way to a 6-0 after MNF.
Got a weird feeling for tonight. I think the Pats care more about beating the Jets next week than the Colts for the third or fourth straight time. Looks like Pats but could be a backdoor cover.
No disrespect but there's NO WAY that could possibly be true lol
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
Got a weird feeling for tonight. I think the Pats care more about beating the Jets next week than the Colts for the third or fourth straight time. Looks like Pats but could be a backdoor cover.
No disrespect but there's NO WAY that could possibly be true lol
meanwhile that douche deluxe "fade or die" has about an 0-20 lifetime record here at covers...youve got a lot to learn from him,suuma....a lot to learn....if only you really knew how this whole entertainment league worked just imagine wat your record wud be like then??
Thanks buddy. I just opened a site that shows consensus numbers and faded the public
0
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
...another winning week,thank you my man.
not bad for an "average capper"
meanwhile that douche deluxe "fade or die" has about an 0-20 lifetime record here at covers...youve got a lot to learn from him,suuma....a lot to learn....if only you really knew how this whole entertainment league worked just imagine wat your record wud be like then??
Thanks buddy. I just opened a site that shows consensus numbers and faded the public
The public of course does exist. Talk to any sportsbook manager and he will tell you it does (something you've clearly never done.)
And lines most certainly move off of sharp money.
Again, this is well documented in the sportsbooking world.
Now, to your larger point of FOLLOWING these things to make money?
Well, do such a thing over the long-term and it is a 50/50 proposition. Capping just can't be reduced to these things. I like to use them just as icing on the cake for my picks already capped.
But you can do some line reading (which works) and find out and access reliable sources where money came from.
You don't have any experience with this so I understand your why you are saying what saying.
Suuma.....a PRISTINE week of picks and I think you are well on your way to a 6-0 after MNF.
But I can't believe that without some proof, scal
Thanks my friend, I think the Giants are going to get shredded.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
You're dead wrong bud.
The public of course does exist. Talk to any sportsbook manager and he will tell you it does (something you've clearly never done.)
And lines most certainly move off of sharp money.
Again, this is well documented in the sportsbooking world.
Now, to your larger point of FOLLOWING these things to make money?
Well, do such a thing over the long-term and it is a 50/50 proposition. Capping just can't be reduced to these things. I like to use them just as icing on the cake for my picks already capped.
But you can do some line reading (which works) and find out and access reliable sources where money came from.
You don't have any experience with this so I understand your why you are saying what saying.
Suuma.....a PRISTINE week of picks and I think you are well on your way to a 6-0 after MNF.
But I can't believe that without some proof, scal
Thanks my friend, I think the Giants are going to get shredded.
You're dead wrong bud. The public of course does exist. Talk to any sportsbook manager and he will tell you it does (something you've clearly never done.)And lines most certainly move off of sharp money.Again, this is well documented in the sportsbooking world.Now, to your larger point of FOLLOWING these things to make money? Well, do such a thing over the long-term and it is a 50/50 proposition. Capping just can't be reduced to these things. I like to use them just as icing on the cake for my picks already capped.But you can do some line reading (which works) and find out and access reliable sources where money came from.You don't have any experience with this so I understand your why you are saying what saying.Suuma.....a PRISTINE week of picks and I think you are well on your way to a 6-0 after MNF.
But I can't believe that without some proof, scal Thanks my friend, I think the Giants are going to get shredded.
Suuma, I have talked directly to sportsbook managers and there is a public side and a sharp side and I can assure you they know which side is which.
There are also sites and podcasts you can listen to to find the sharp and public sides (and you have every right to choose not to believe them).
And there is also line movement based on sharp money and public money and it happens with certainty almost every week.
I'm not saying side with the sharps or fade the public. I've capped games and regardless of what sharps/public do, I am confident in my pick and have hit many picks with a public side.
Using sharp/public line movement to pick other games you haven't capped aggresssively is a tried and true shortcut that is used endlessly by people who know how to do it.
Great week! Philly tonight!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
You're dead wrong bud. The public of course does exist. Talk to any sportsbook manager and he will tell you it does (something you've clearly never done.)And lines most certainly move off of sharp money.Again, this is well documented in the sportsbooking world.Now, to your larger point of FOLLOWING these things to make money? Well, do such a thing over the long-term and it is a 50/50 proposition. Capping just can't be reduced to these things. I like to use them just as icing on the cake for my picks already capped.But you can do some line reading (which works) and find out and access reliable sources where money came from.You don't have any experience with this so I understand your why you are saying what saying.Suuma.....a PRISTINE week of picks and I think you are well on your way to a 6-0 after MNF.
But I can't believe that without some proof, scal Thanks my friend, I think the Giants are going to get shredded.
Suuma, I have talked directly to sportsbook managers and there is a public side and a sharp side and I can assure you they know which side is which.
There are also sites and podcasts you can listen to to find the sharp and public sides (and you have every right to choose not to believe them).
And there is also line movement based on sharp money and public money and it happens with certainty almost every week.
I'm not saying side with the sharps or fade the public. I've capped games and regardless of what sharps/public do, I am confident in my pick and have hit many picks with a public side.
Using sharp/public line movement to pick other games you haven't capped aggresssively is a tried and true shortcut that is used endlessly by people who know how to do it.
I agree there is a public and sharp side. Though how does Vegas determine the sharps? Guys like Teddy Covers, Steve Fezzik are big names but how do you know the other sharps unless they happen to know certain cappers are good. Any guy can be a sharp if they are good but does Vegas know most of them?
0
I agree there is a public and sharp side. Though how does Vegas determine the sharps? Guys like Teddy Covers, Steve Fezzik are big names but how do you know the other sharps unless they happen to know certain cappers are good. Any guy can be a sharp if they are good but does Vegas know most of them?
Yes, I went 4-1 without tailing you but with your assistance.
Your research supported my NE-IND thesis and helped me overcome my reluctance to back Luck. Your astute observation that QB coach McConnell would elevate McCown's game helped me take CLV +4. I am glad you got the push at DEN -3.
Thanks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
Hope you guys all had a profitable week
Yes, I went 4-1 without tailing you but with your assistance.
Your research supported my NE-IND thesis and helped me overcome my reluctance to back Luck. Your astute observation that QB coach McConnell would elevate McCown's game helped me take CLV +4. I am glad you got the push at DEN -3.
I agree there is a public and sharp side. Though how does Vegas determine the sharps? Guys like Teddy Covers, Steve Fezzik are big names but how do you know the other sharps unless they happen to know certain cappers are good. Any guy can be a sharp if they are good but does Vegas know most of them?
When you are hitting max wagers at books and collecting the max, the books immediately know who you are. They even get to know their runners as well.
0
Quote Originally Posted by NFLCap:
I agree there is a public and sharp side. Though how does Vegas determine the sharps? Guys like Teddy Covers, Steve Fezzik are big names but how do you know the other sharps unless they happen to know certain cappers are good. Any guy can be a sharp if they are good but does Vegas know most of them?
When you are hitting max wagers at books and collecting the max, the books immediately know who you are. They even get to know their runners as well.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
...another winning week,thank you my man.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
