All Forums | NFL Betting

suuma's NFL week two

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 29899
Posts: 162
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2015
Posts: 57
Posted: #126
Better luck next week
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 4125
Posted: #127
No disrespect intended, but why so much love for these picks. My tally shows a 2-4 day. Last week was very good, but to be considered a good handicapper you have to be consistent

Kansas City -3
Tampa Bay Bucs @ New Orleans Saints Over 47 -108
St. Louis Rams -3 -110
Cincinnati Bengals -3 -108
Miami Dolphins -6 -108
Oakland Raiders +6 -104


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2015
Posts: 1375
Posted: #128
Quote Originally Posted by irage:

No disrespect intended, but why so much love for these picks. My tally shows a 2-4 day. Last week was very good, but to be considered a good handicapper you have to be consistent



The fact that you measure success in increments of week to week, rather than a season as a whole, exposes this for the whining post that it is. 

'Good, consistent' handicappers have crazy good weeks, and crazy bad weeks. Go learn about 'significant sample sizes' before you come in here having a cry about one specific week's results.

And yes, you're crying. That's obvious to everyone here. 

'Wah wah, I lost this week tailing you, EXPLAIN YOURSELF to me now.'

STFU, box.


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 6716
Posted: #129
Quote Originally Posted by irage:

No disrespect intended, but why so much love for these picks. My tally shows a 2-4 day. Last week was very good, but to be considered a good handicapper you have to be consistent

Kansas City -3
Tampa Bay Bucs @ New Orleans Saints Over 47 -108
St. Louis Rams -3 -110
Cincinnati Bengals -3 -108
Miami Dolphins -6 -108
Oakland Raiders +6 -104





EVERYONE CLAP IT UP FOR THE biggest IDIOT HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 


SO ONE WEEK WHERE HE GOES 2-4 AND HE IS NOT A GOOD CAPPER? 


LMAO ONE WEEK WHERE HE LOSES 2 UNITS AND ALL OF A SUDDEN HE IS NOT A CONSISTENT CAPPER??!?!?!?! 




LOL THE BIGGEST IDIOT HERE... CLAP IT UP FOR HIM PLEASE 


(SOUNDS LIKE SOMEONE IS JEALOUS OF ALL THE ATTENTION SUMAA GETS) 

if you could write half as well of a write up he does, bravo. Until then, shut ur behind up 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 94
Posted: #130
Quote Originally Posted by irage:

No disrespect intended, but why so much love for these picks. My tally shows a 2-4 day. Last week was very good, but to be considered a good handicapper you have to be consistentKansas City -3Tampa Bay Bucs @ New Orleans Saints Over 47 -108St. Louis Rams -3 -110Cincinnati Bengals -3 -108Miami Dolphins -6 -108Oakland Raiders +6 -104


Suuma has a track record of posting significant winning seasons, so I'm not sure who you are to question his consistency. If all we ever did was post winning weeks then we'd all be rich. You can't make judgements on anything based upon one weeks results.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 2852
Posted: #131
Quote Originally Posted by irage:

No disrespect intended, but why so much love for these picks. My tally shows a 2-4 day. Last week was very good, but to be considered a good handicapper you have to be consistent

Kansas City -3
Tampa Bay Bucs @ New Orleans Saints Over 47 -108
St. Louis Rams -3 -110
Cincinnati Bengals -3 -108
Miami Dolphins -6 -108
Oakland Raiders +6 -104



Your statement hold no water when it revolves around such a small sample size. It's been only two week cool guy. If you were to look however, to his record over a span of 20 weeks (a significant sample size) you would know he's solid. Read before you post please. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2015
Posts: 199
Posted: #132
Quote Originally Posted by irage:

No disrespect intended, but why so much love for these picks. My tally shows a 2-4 day. Last week was very good, but to be considered a good handicapper you have to be consistentKansas City -3Tampa Bay Bucs @ New Orleans Saints Over 47 -108St. Louis Rams -3 -110Cincinnati Bengals -3 -108Miami Dolphins -6 -108Oakland Raiders +6 -104


Are you 12 years old?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 4455
Posted: #133
Quote Originally Posted by irage:

No disrespect intended, but why so much love for these picks. My tally shows a 2-4 day. Last week was very good, but to be considered a good handicapper you have to be consistent

Kansas City -3
Tampa Bay Bucs @ New Orleans Saints Over 47 -108
St. Louis Rams -3 -110
Cincinnati Bengals -3 -108
Miami Dolphins -6 -108
Oakland Raiders +6 -104



I had a good laugh 

Not that I need to justify but for those who didnt watch all the games: 

Had the Chiefs game predicted spot on, but was on the wrong side of 5 KC turnovers who averaged like 1 with Alex Smith. The Saints and Bucs combined for 7 red zone attempts plus the Saints missed a two-point conversion and an extra point. Goes over 47 in 9 of 10 games.

Wrong call on Fins and Rams (terrible letdown, they couldnt tackle) but even the Fins had a shot at covering but the loss of Albert was too much.

Irage please come back when I bounce back heavily.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 116
Posted: #134
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:


I had a good laugh 

Not that I need to justify but for those who didnt watch all the games: 

Had the Chiefs game predicted spot on, but was on the wrong side of 5 KC turnovers who averaged like 1 with Alex Smith. The Saints and Bucs combined for 7 red zone attempts plus the Saints missed a two-point conversion and an extra point. Goes over 47 in 9 of 10 games.

Wrong call on Fins and Rams (terrible letdown, they couldnt tackle) but even the Fins had a shot at covering but the loss of Albert was too much.

Irage please come back when I bounce back heavily.






Cannot be perfect Suuma, keep up the good write up my friend.
Thank You.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 15769
Posted: #135
Quote Originally Posted by irage:

No disrespect intended, but why so much love for these picks. My tally shows a 2-4 day. Last week was very good, but to be considered a good handicapper you have to be consistent

Kansas City -3
Tampa Bay Bucs @ New Orleans Saints Over 47 -108
St. Louis Rams -3 -110
Cincinnati Bengals -3 -108
Miami Dolphins -6 -108
Oakland Raiders +6 -104





fu.ken world class idiot!!!....

you are EVERYTHING that is wrong with covers
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 20994
Posted: #136
IRAGE...

Unbelievable to make a judgement on one of the hardest working cappers in Covers.

He provides more information week to week than you probably retained in your 4 years in high school.

Look......HE PROVIDES THE INFORMATION FOR FREE!!!....then you decide weather or not you want to bet on a team if you want to include his OPINION.

How is he held responsible for your loss's???

How about we make a complete judgement on what kind of man you are based on what you wrote.  Guess most would think your a DOUCHE.  

Should we judge you by your one statement?  Should you judge Summa on one week of capping?  Get a clue!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2003
Posts: 9064
Posted: #137
Suuma, you taking the Jets and if yes how much of that is the astute handicapper and how much is the inner fan?
BOL
The pen is mightier than the pigs
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1020
Posted: #138
Fck the haters suuma. You'll bounce back.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33596
Posted: #139
Quote Originally Posted by irage:

No disrespect intended, but why so much love for these picks. My tally shows a 2-4 day. Last week was very good, but to be considered a good handicapper you have to be consistent

Kansas City -3
Tampa Bay Bucs @ New Orleans Saints Over 47 -108
St. Louis Rams -3 -110
Cincinnati Bengals -3 -108
Miami Dolphins -6 -108
Oakland Raiders +6 -104



Well, as so many others have pointed out, you sure are not the brightest are you?

Way to make yourself look stupid. 
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 6196
Posted: #140

What a fantastic call on the Raiders. I can prolly count on 1 hand how many people are smart enough to have been on the Raiders yesterday. I didn't play this game but I certainly would have been on Ravens ML or something similar. Very solid, sharp play.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 6196
Posted: #141
Quote Originally Posted by Cooler999:

IRAGE...

Unbelievable to make a judgement on one of the hardest working cappers in Covers.

He provides more information week to week than you probably retained in your 4 years in high school.

Look......HE PROVIDES THE INFORMATION FOR FREE!!!....then you decide weather or not you want to bet on a team if you want to include his OPINION.

How is he held responsible for your loss's???

How about we make a complete judgement on what kind of man you are based on what you wrote.  Guess most would think your a DOUCHE.  

Should we judge you by your one statement?  Should you judge Summa on one week of capping?  Get a clue!

this.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 84
Posted: #142
Suuma, you on the Jets tonight?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 1138
Posted: #143
Tailed you on KC. Truly believe it was the right side 100%. Charles cost them the game. Also, some terrible play calls. If Charles doesn't fumble on first drive of game Chiefs win. Stayed away from Rams, not a good spot for them. Overtime win at home vs Hawks going on road vs Skins team after a loss. You're a great capper I just think you should look at "spots" a little more. Tailed on Bucs over. One of the sloppiest ugliest games I've ever witnessed. Two bad football teams. Missed EP, two missed FGs, just a $hit-show.

Dolphins was just a bad pick. Never stood a chance. Good call on Oakland. Hope you're wrong tonight on Jets but I love them getting 7. The money line has moved from +315 to +235.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 124
Posted: #144
I too did not have a good week.


Bengals
Pitt
Ravens
Dolphins
Philly

I lost the 3 afternoon games where the road dog all won. I would attribute that to a bit of variance but I probably overestimated and underestimated certain teams. 

Everyone is going to have down weeks. Though I was leaning Cards and maybe my game selection could have been better. Still you learn things after week 2 is over that I did not know. Have to know which teams to avoid and which to focus on.


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 49568
Posted: #145
You cannot cap motivation, hidden agendas, mood or how a player thinks in the middle of action with a lot of influences going on all at once(crowd, refs, violent hits, trash talking etc) Everything is moving fast and players have to react quickly....and players make mistakes in the heat of battle. 

Suuma is one of the most insightful cappers on this board. Love his analysis on o-lines and how many hits hurries they allow. Makes all the difference most of the time


Sip on that plus money honey!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2015
Posts: 57
Posted: #146
Don't feel bad for the dolphins pick those clowns fucked everybody's behind in the entire gambling world
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2015
Posts: 57
Posted: #147
*behind
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1033
Posted: #148
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:


I had a good laugh 

Not that I need to justify but for those who didnt watch all the games: 

Had the Chiefs game predicted spot on, but was on the wrong side of 5 KC turnovers who averaged like 1 with Alex Smith. The Saints and Bucs combined for 7 red zone attempts plus the Saints missed a two-point conversion and an extra point. Goes over 47 in 9 of 10 games.

Wrong call on Fins and Rams (terrible letdown, they couldnt tackle) but even the Fins had a shot at covering but the loss of Albert was too much.

Irage please come back when I bounce back heavily.


I dont know nearly as much about football as you suuma, but I could see that we were unlucky in Chiefs game and unlucky for the total not to go over, but hey thats gambling.

I hope you don;t let a clown like irage get to you, as I am really enjoying your write ups and hope they continue throughout the season.



Go Jets!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2005
Posted: #149
Quote Originally Posted by BetFriends:


The fact that you measure success in increments of week to week, rather than a season as a whole, exposes this for the whining post that it is. 

'Good, consistent' handicappers have crazy good weeks, and crazy bad weeks. Go learn about 'significant sample sizes' before you come in here having a cry about one specific week's results.

And yes, you're crying. That's obvious to everyone here. 

'Wah wah, I lost this week tailing you, EXPLAIN YOURSELF to me now.'

STFU, box.




Haha, it's week two...out of 20.  The sky is falling!
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 51182
Posted: #150
GL tonight Bud 
R.I.P. Legend
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.