remember that Dallas was missing two key guys on the OLine that game
did Dallas learn from that situation or will they come down a notch or two tonight?
i think dallas wins but doesnt cover
remember that Dallas was missing two key guys on the OLine that game
did Dallas learn from that situation or will they come down a notch or two tonight?
i think dallas wins but doesnt cover
agree
Dallas 19-0 SU, 17-2 ATS their last 19 on turf. there's always a trend......
also for those looking at the Taxi/Bator trend, ensure you are using division!=o:division
that's a key parameter
agree
Dallas 19-0 SU, 17-2 ATS their last 19 on turf. there's always a trend......
also for those looking at the Taxi/Bator trend, ensure you are using division!=o:division
that's a key parameter
[Quote: Originally Posted by jefff]Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy_Cats: You can always find an angle if you look hard enough. Here's one that applies to Seattle only, and not every team in the NFL. The Seahawks are 1-5 ATS the week after playing the 49ers. This is the Seahawks vs Cowboys. It is a recent trend involving these teams as they are playing now. I don't really give a fuck how some teams did in this situation 20 years ago when these players were in grade school. Another recent trend involving one of the teams playing tomorrow is the Cowboys are 3-1 ATS the week after they score 40+ points. Just another way of looking at it. agree Dallas 19-0 SU, 17-2 ATS their last 19 on turf. there's always a trend...... also for those looking at the Taxi/Bator trend, ensure you are using division!=o:divisionthat's a key parameter[/Quote
Trends and systems are different. Trends are team specific and systems involve any team in a specific situation which makes it much more logical.
[Quote: Originally Posted by jefff]Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy_Cats: You can always find an angle if you look hard enough. Here's one that applies to Seattle only, and not every team in the NFL. The Seahawks are 1-5 ATS the week after playing the 49ers. This is the Seahawks vs Cowboys. It is a recent trend involving these teams as they are playing now. I don't really give a fuck how some teams did in this situation 20 years ago when these players were in grade school. Another recent trend involving one of the teams playing tomorrow is the Cowboys are 3-1 ATS the week after they score 40+ points. Just another way of looking at it. agree Dallas 19-0 SU, 17-2 ATS their last 19 on turf. there's always a trend...... also for those looking at the Taxi/Bator trend, ensure you are using division!=o:divisionthat's a key parameter[/Quote
Trends and systems are different. Trends are team specific and systems involve any team in a specific situation which makes it much more logical.
Yes, but the Dolphins were up against an equally powerful system that week against the Bills, not to mention they were coming off that 726-yard, 10-touchdown party against the Broncos.
Yes, but the Dolphins were up against an equally powerful system that week against the Bills, not to mention they were coming off that 726-yard, 10-touchdown party against the Broncos.
It's the same rare buzzsaw situation that the Niners are very likely to fall victim to on Sunday in the 1st half. Back in Week 5, the Niners were the beneficiaries of this situation and they smashed the Cowboys 21-7 en route to a 42-10 win.
It's the same rare buzzsaw situation that the Niners are very likely to fall victim to on Sunday in the 1st half. Back in Week 5, the Niners were the beneficiaries of this situation and they smashed the Cowboys 21-7 en route to a 42-10 win.
Throw out the lone result in 2020 as that was a fake season played in front of no fans, so 5-22 ATS since the 2000 season. The five starting quarterbacks who failed to capitalize on the Double Blowout system were...
...Billy Volek of the Titans in 2004, who lost 51-24 to Peyton Manning and the Colts
...Jason Campbell of the Redskins, who lost 24-10 to the Ravens in 2008
...Johnny Manziel of the Browns, who lost 30-13 to the Seahawks in 2015
...Kirk Cousins of the Vikings, who lost 34-26 to the Niners in 2021
...Tua Tagovailoa of the Dolphins, who lost 48-20 to the Bills earlier this season but gets a pass from me due to the reason given in my preceding post
Throw out the lone result in 2020 as that was a fake season played in front of no fans, so 5-22 ATS since the 2000 season. The five starting quarterbacks who failed to capitalize on the Double Blowout system were...
...Billy Volek of the Titans in 2004, who lost 51-24 to Peyton Manning and the Colts
...Jason Campbell of the Redskins, who lost 24-10 to the Ravens in 2008
...Johnny Manziel of the Browns, who lost 30-13 to the Seahawks in 2015
...Kirk Cousins of the Vikings, who lost 34-26 to the Niners in 2021
...Tua Tagovailoa of the Dolphins, who lost 48-20 to the Bills earlier this season but gets a pass from me due to the reason given in my preceding post
Since when did all of these people start questioning who created the system? Twin peaks, butt cheeks, whatever you want to call it. Just follow it. MrBator is the one who put a lot of people on to it on covers, so props to him regardless
Since when did all of these people start questioning who created the system? Twin peaks, butt cheeks, whatever you want to call it. Just follow it. MrBator is the one who put a lot of people on to it on covers, so props to him regardless
Not true, I'm learning every day. Just offering another way to look at a situation. Is that a bad thing? Is betting Seattle blindly because they fit a system the mark of a learned man?
Not true, I'm learning every day. Just offering another way to look at a situation. Is that a bad thing? Is betting Seattle blindly because they fit a system the mark of a learned man?
Will DaRon Bland extend his NBA record of 5 pick 6s?
Will DaRon Bland extend his NBA record of 5 pick 6s?
I'm not even tempted by +10 -110. You know what would be cool? If the Cowboys roll again tonight, their offense will sputter next week aginst the Eagles. I'm not saying the Eagles will win. I'm saying that game will be a tremendous UNDER bet (again, that's if the Cowboys score a bunch more tonight).
I'm not even tempted by +10 -110. You know what would be cool? If the Cowboys roll again tonight, their offense will sputter next week aginst the Eagles. I'm not saying the Eagles will win. I'm saying that game will be a tremendous UNDER bet (again, that's if the Cowboys score a bunch more tonight).
I never really talked myself into it. I was on the Seahawks +7.5 last week. I hate losing twice in a row with the same group of losers.
I never really talked myself into it. I was on the Seahawks +7.5 last week. I hate losing twice in a row with the same group of losers.
Understandable and relatable
Understandable and relatable
I have a game later/day later system. The team that screwed me usually wins the following game. It is pretty accurate. I learned to hold my nose and blindly bet them and have done well with it.
I have a game later/day later system. The team that screwed me usually wins the following game. It is pretty accurate. I learned to hold my nose and blindly bet them and have done well with it.
Quote Originally Posted by kimoinsd808: @MrBator You talk yourself out of this game? I never really talked myself into it. I was on the Seahawks +7.5 last week. I hate losing twice in a row with the same group of losers.
Best line of the year
Quote Originally Posted by kimoinsd808: @MrBator You talk yourself out of this game? I never really talked myself into it. I was on the Seahawks +7.5 last week. I hate losing twice in a row with the same group of losers.
Best line of the year
Handicapping the handicapper.
Handicapping the handicapper.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.