All Forums | NFL Betting

The Bator Rule will go in effect.

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 9818
Posts: 166
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 2747
Posted: #151

Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy_Cats:

Quote Originally Posted by BallingLikeNE: Pretty sure some must be the bookies trying to cast doubt on one of the best systems around. @ThirdEye4747 Are you guys incapable of looking this up? From 11/07/92 to 12/26/10, using this system you would have gone 17-2. Excellent system! Since then, the system had an 8-6 record going into tonite's game. That's a huge difference. It's not nearly as strong as it used to be. If you ant to keep thinking it's the world's greatest system, then go ahead. But most of the results happened between 14 and 31 years ago. The last 13 years this system has gone 9-6, counting tonite's game. The last 4 years, the system is 3-3. The system is not as strong as it once was. That's all I'm pointing out.

 

is this a joke? You’re saying the system has gone 8-6 since 2010? So the last 13 years, this scenario has only been presented 14 times? an_roll_laugh

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 2747
Posted: #152

This scenario presents itself MULTIPLE times during a season. By your strange math it’s averaging once a season which is inaccurate.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 2747
Posted: #153

Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

There are a number of other Double Blowout System winners that took place in the playoffs. The one I'm most fond of happened way back in 1995 when the Detroit Lions met the Eagles in the Wild Card round in Philadelphia. Both teams finished the regular season 10-6, but the way the two teams played in December formed a public perception that led to a public BURIAL on December 30th, 1995. The Eagles went 2-2 in their final four games, losing their finale in Chicago. Their two wins that month were by 3 points and 1 point. Meanwhile the Lions won their last 7 regular season games, and in their final two games defeated the Jaguars 44-0 and the Buccaneers 37-10.  The Eagles opened as a a 1-point favorite, coincidentally just like the Eagles this week against the Niners. But the public was so impresssed with the Lions' recent performance that they were certain that the Lions would roll over the Eagles even though the game was being played in Philly, coincidentally what many are assuming will happen to the Eagles this week. The Lions were bet from a 1-point underdog all the way to a 3-point favorite, coincidentally just like the Niners this week.   The Eagles led the Lions 38-7 at halftime and won the game 58-37.

Are you taking the Eagles this week?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 99
Posted: #154

@charlieloveit

moneybag Great call out, it's an effective betting strategy 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1495
Posted: #155

Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

The Texans defeated the Browns 30-12 and the Buccanners 37-9 prior to defeating the Jaguars 20-13. That doesn't fit my system. The Niners defeated the Rams 35-11 and the Texans 34-3 prior to defeating the Cardinals 32-20. That doesn't fit my system either.   Look, it's apparent that we're all never going to get on the same page as to what parameters we wanna use, so let's just each use whatever parameters we feel like using, and even better, let's quit talking about it. The next time this situation comes up in the NFL, I pledge to not type a single word about it! Okay?

I really don't understand why some people just don't comprehend the Bator rule - Fade teams that score 30 pts or more and allow 10 points or less 2 games in a row.  Division doesn't matter.  Bye weeks don't matter.  Win streaks don't matter.  Trends don't matter.  How many times the kicker scratches his nutsack during the national anthem doesn't matter.  It's really not complicated.  It's freaking simple.  And yet, every time a spot that fits this system or comes close to fitting this system pops up, a few jacklegs show up and love to argue with the dude who created the system, about the system he created.  I'll tell all of you DAs the same thing I tell my teenage son - shut your mouth, open your ears, pay attention and learn something from those that have been there and done that.

God is great, beer is good, and people are crazy.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 2747
Posted: #156

an_roll_laugh

well said.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 5466
Posted: #157

@jefff

 Thank you!!! The Big difference between the systems is outside of your division...This system is 2-0 Ats this year...

Arizona beating Dallas outright as Underdogs.

Seattle covering against Dallas.

 

GO AGAINST ANY NFL TEAM IF THEY SCORED 30 OR MORE POINTS in EACH OF THEIR LAST TWO GAMES AND ALLOWED 12 OR LESS POINTS in THOSE SAME TWO GAMES if THEY ARE NOW PLAYING A TEAM OUTSIDE OF THEIR DIVISION.

Money Management and discipline is the key to success in sports investing
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 5466
Posted: #158

Here are some examples:

The Jacksonville Jaguars in 1999 beat the Bengals 41-10, then beat the Falcons 30-7, and then beat the Ravens 6-3 (but didn't cover as a 13-point favorite).

The Kansas City Chiefs in 1999 beat the Ravens 35-8, then beat the Chargers 34-0, and then lost to the Colts in Indianapolis 25-17.

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers in 2000 beat the Bears 41-0, then beat the Lions 31-10, and then lost at home to the Jets 21-17.

The Jacksonville Jaguars in 2000 beat the Browns 48-0, then beat the Cardinals 44-10, and then lost 17-14 to the Bengals in Cincinnati.

The St. Louis Rams in 2001 beat the Dolphins 42-10, then beat the Lions 35-0, and then beat the Giants at home 15-14 (but didn't cover as a 14.5 point favorite).

The Green Bay Packers in 2003 beat the Raiders 41-7, then beat the Broncos 31-3, and then beat the Seahawks in a wild card playoff game at home in overtime 33-27 (but didn't cover as a 6.5 point favorite).

The Seattle Seahawks in 2005 beat the Eagles 42-0, then beat the 49ers 41-3, and then beat the Titans in Tennessee 28-24 (but didn't cover as a 7-point favorite).

The Chicago Bears in 2006 beat the Seahawks 37-6, then beat the Bills 40-7, and then beat the Cardinals in Arizona 24-23 (but didn't cover as a 13-point favorite....."They are who we thought they were!")

The Dallas Cowboys in 2007 beat the Bears 34-10, then beat the Rams 35-7, and then beat the Bills in Buffalo 25-24 (but didn't cover as an 11-point favorite).

The Minnesota Vikings in 2009 beat the Seahawks 35-9, then beat the Bears 36-10, and then lost to the Cardinals in Arizona 30-17 (as a 3-point favorite).

The Indianapolis Colts in 2009 beat the Titans 31-9, then beat the Rams 42-6, and then beat the 49ers at home 18-14 (but didn't cover as a 13-point favorite).

The Green Bay Packers in 2009 beat the Seahawks 48-10, then beat the Cardinals 33-7, then returned to Arizona one week later for a wild card playoff game and lost 51-45 in overtime (as a 2.5-point favorite)

Money Management and discipline is the key to success in sports investing
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2023
Posts: 7393
Posted: #159

BIG CONGRATS ON THE SYSTEM....thx post    moneybag

goldfinger 1964
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 361
Posted: #160

Quote Originally Posted by bluecompass:

Quote Originally Posted by MrBator: The Texans defeated the Browns 30-12 and the Buccanners 37-9 prior to defeating the Jaguars 20-13. That doesn't fit my system. The Niners defeated the Rams 35-11 and the Texans 34-3 prior to defeating the Cardinals 32-20. That doesn't fit my system either.   Look, it's apparent that we're all never going to get on the same page as to what parameters we wanna use, so let's just each use whatever parameters we feel like using, and even better, let's quit talking about it. The next time this situation comes up in the NFL, I pledge to not type a single word about it! Okay? I really don't understand why some people just don't comprehend the Bator rule - Fade teams that score 30 pts or more and allow 10 points or less 2 games in a row.  Division doesn't matter.  Bye weeks don't matter.  Win streaks don't matter.  Trends don't matter.  How many times the kicker scratches his nutsack during the national anthem doesn't matter.  It's really not complicated.  It's freaking simple.  And yet, every time a spot that fits this system or comes close to fitting this system pops up, a few jacklegs show up and love to argue with the dude who created the system, about the system he created.  I'll tell all of you DAs the same thing I tell my teenage son - shut your mouth, open your ears, pay attention and learn something from those that have been there and done that.

Whoa...this is where I stand up & call BS.  It does matter, especially when you claim someone created the system.  I give credit to Bator, but I give credit to Dave aka Taxi for introducing the system to us more than two decades ago.  Jefff & I and some other members here were members of Talksport in the late 90's & so was Taxi.  I remember very well Taxi shared his system with us before the Rams played the Giants in 2001...when teams in the system were 0-7 ats at that point.

I've been there and done that, so don't ever tell me to shut my mouth!

We had this system posted a customcappers before Dallas played Ariz in week 3 & again last week.

Anyone can verify the system by going to killersports, click on the nfl sdql query & type in:  p:points>=30 and pp:points>=30 and po:points<=10 and ppo:points<=10 and NDIV and playoffs=0

then hit enter

14-11 s/u & 3-22 ats

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 2747
Posted: #161

@jdukes0004

No one cares if outside your division or within. Stop layering additional parameters on top of what already works. Keep it simple. 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 11412
Posted: #162

All i know is it worked. Sea +9.5 was the play. Thanks to whoever created it or posted it.moneybag peace_5

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50595
Posted: #163

Quote Originally Posted by Riderx:

Anyone can verify the system by going to killersports, click on the nfl sdql query & type in:  p:points>=30 and pp:points>=30 and po:points<=10 and ppo:points<=10 and NDIV and playoffs=0 then hit enter 14-11 s/u & 3-22 ats

 

 

Why exclude playoff games? This system has never lost in the playoffs (at least as far back as 1989). The Super Bowl last February provided us with another winner after the Eagles went into the Super Bowl after defeating the Giants 38-7 and the Niners 31-7.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 361
Posted: #164

@MrBator

 Hey MrB, this is true, you can leave the playoffs in there...4-26 ats with the lone cover by a hook of Minny +3' at Norl in week 20.  Anyways, keep up the good work...cool

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 5466
Posted: #165

@BallingLikeNE

 I'm not layering anything... I was simply stating the difference between my system and Bator system if you're not intellectual enough to understand and figure that out, that's a You problem...case closed!!!

Money Management and discipline is the key to success in sports investing
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 617
Posted: #166

@MrBator

 We had the last laugh sir. I broke even, I wanted the moneyline is what I needed to make a nice dollar. 

Cheers to you sir and thanks for letting me use you name on this thread. 

clover

All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.