The Cardinals Just Gave SF Backers An Early Christmas Gift

Question

If you had SF -10, congratulations.

Projeff · Accepted Answer

It should have been reviewed and reversed

kodiak · Answer

If you had SF -10, congratulations.

davemsh · Answer

Line closed -9.5

blueandorange · Answer

Christ, for once the moose went my way.

vegasdon1 · Answer

wow that was a blessing.  had sf 2nd half and on a teaser so didn&#x27;t matter but wow

Projeff · Answer

He was down and SF #23 had a knee on him, should have never counted

Stryc9Nine · Answer

Yeah I feel bad for people that had Zona. This happens every year in the NFL and NCAA. Such a nasty way to lose or push.

smacksmiter · Answer

I missed it...pick 6 on last play of the game?

rollonotes · Answer

I thought all tds are reviewed?

insatiable · Answer

So 37-26?

rollonotes · Answer

[&#xA;Quote: Originally Posted by Projeff]He was down and SF #23 had a knee on him, should have never counted[/Quote]&#xA; &#xA;Agree. They didn&#x27;t even review it

2001bmw · Answer

fixed!!!  the play was dead and nobody care to review it!

football_007 · Answer

36-26 no point after at the clock end ?

nfl_brosuf · Answer

I don&#x27;t know about y&#x27;all but here in Santa Clara 49ers,  they are going crazy.

smacksmiter · Answer

Must have been the last play of regulation...they no longer require a point after try on a TD in the last play...

kodiak · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by smacksmiter]I missed it...pick 6 on last play of the game?[/Quote

No, last play of game, Cardinals were trying to lateral the ball...the ball was in open field and SF picked it up and ran back for a game ending touchdown.

Projeff · Answer

Plus they should have had to kick the extra point, refs completely blew the ending and it made a huge difference

football_007 · Answer

This game is fixed as hell even though I had SF and already counted as a loss

nfl_brosuf · Answer

No need to review cuz taking points off zona would still lose.  Time out for review when people are leaving the stadium with 0 clock left, which ref wants to work overtime?

rollonotes · Answer

I like how the commentator said "oh...this could mean a lot to....a certain amount of people....if they count this a TD"&#xA;Shady funkers!!!

glyde69 · Answer

Yesterday I won a game(Iowa -3.5) on a missed XP after an apparent late backdoor. I thought to myself nice to get a lucky one for once.

I should have known it was become moose city the other way. Small Baylor ML beat. Now push here getting 10 and my team up 3 under a minute to play.

I got rams PK on backend of a 4 team pleaser, and KC -4 tomorrow. I’m sure it’s F city in those as well.

Unreal. And my buddy said he was down and shouldn’t have counted but refs didn’t review it. Unreal.

begginerboy · Answer

The announcer calling the game on fox said this score is going to affect a lot of people out there. Lol

NutinButtLove · Answer

&#xA;For any other dopes who dont know the rules of the game they bet on, if time has expired they dont don&#x27;t kick the PAT unless it can change the outcome of the game, so its same as a TD in OT

smacksmiter · Answer

No longer correct...it used to be that way, they changed the rule...the PAT is no longer required on a TD that ends the game...

football_007 · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by NutinButtLove]  &#xD;&#xA;For any other dopes who dont know the rules of the game they bet on, if time has expired they dont don&#x27;t kick the PAT unless it can change the outcome of the game, so its same as a TD in OT  [/Quote]Yep.

The Cardinals Just Gave SF Backers An Early Christmas Gift

Hot Forum Topics