Posted:
#26
Moneyline wagering is a very good way to approach sports, it puts your interest squarely with the interest of the athletes and coaches.
There are two flaws to your approach that I see
1) Wagering moneylines of 200+ are a losers game. It does not matter if you like the dogs or chalk. The vig goes up exponentially with ML wagering, and it's like trying to paddle upstream. Trust me I know I have analyzed this up and down over 25 years of wagering. I keep my ML wagers in the +/-170 range or lower.
2) Weighted wagering is also a losers game. One unit each game. This has been proven to be the professional approach over and over again.
With those two very large and significant exceptions, I will call bullshit. I think you are an attention person by making up this crap and posting on covers.
There are two flaws to your approach that I see
1) Wagering moneylines of 200+ are a losers game. It does not matter if you like the dogs or chalk. The vig goes up exponentially with ML wagering, and it's like trying to paddle upstream. Trust me I know I have analyzed this up and down over 25 years of wagering. I keep my ML wagers in the +/-170 range or lower.
2) Weighted wagering is also a losers game. One unit each game. This has been proven to be the professional approach over and over again.
With those two very large and significant exceptions, I will call bullshit. I think you are an attention person by making up this crap and posting on covers.
0
= 1 UNIT (1% of bankroll)
Hot Forum Topics
