I’ll never get that 5 minutes back. Why did I even keep reading after the opener? Basically GB has no chance because they are +165??? If that’s how you pick these games you will never win money doing it.
Haha was thinking the same thing. The number 13 oh no!! Bottom line is this. Green Bay has the best team they have had in years. Defense is playing well without 2 key players in Smith and Alexander. They will be back in the playoffs. Now they have a 2 headed monster at RB with one absolute powerback savage in Dillon and Jones as the shiftier get out in space guy. Lazard has come on to be a very good weapon for rodgers and MVS is always a threat to burn you on a deep play. Even the tight end filling in for Tonyan has been impressive lately. And obviously, Rodgers to Adams has proven to be unstoppable. The worst thing GB has going for them is an idiot coach and a washed up kicker. I'll take the square bet on the packers every week until they get to the SB and if they make it i'll bet them there too. All i know is that I have made very good money on GB and their overs all season. Why stop now? +165 could be a gift if you get in now. I took it at +750 on December 8. Or maybe they got knocked out in the first round by one of these other smoke and mirror NFC teams? Yeah, I'm not buying that for a second. GL all!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Freddy66:
I’ll never get that 5 minutes back. Why did I even keep reading after the opener? Basically GB has no chance because they are +165??? If that’s how you pick these games you will never win money doing it.
Haha was thinking the same thing. The number 13 oh no!! Bottom line is this. Green Bay has the best team they have had in years. Defense is playing well without 2 key players in Smith and Alexander. They will be back in the playoffs. Now they have a 2 headed monster at RB with one absolute powerback savage in Dillon and Jones as the shiftier get out in space guy. Lazard has come on to be a very good weapon for rodgers and MVS is always a threat to burn you on a deep play. Even the tight end filling in for Tonyan has been impressive lately. And obviously, Rodgers to Adams has proven to be unstoppable. The worst thing GB has going for them is an idiot coach and a washed up kicker. I'll take the square bet on the packers every week until they get to the SB and if they make it i'll bet them there too. All i know is that I have made very good money on GB and their overs all season. Why stop now? +165 could be a gift if you get in now. I took it at +750 on December 8. Or maybe they got knocked out in the first round by one of these other smoke and mirror NFC teams? Yeah, I'm not buying that for a second. GL all!
@Danny9999 What would be the best way to apply your opinions on the Packers to sports betting? You are very confident that they will not win the NFC, are you going to bet the moneyline on their opponent in the Divisional round and then double down in the Championship round if the Packers advance regardless of opponents? I'm generally curious, I respect your approach that I've seen you take in other threads. Hearing what you think would be the best way to bet this would be more productive than just saying not to bet Packers at +160.
Sorry, heading to Vegas in an hour, missed this post.
I will definitely bet against them each game. They are going to lose in the NFC. A certain amount depending on who they play next week and then probably 3 times that if they happen to win next week.
Also, probably going to bet Dallas if I can find a good number. TB had a lot of injuries even before the AB situation.
Someone here posted you can get GB and TB to win NFC at -150. That is screaming fishy as fuk to me. Chic cardinals posted that these are the only 2 teams that matter in NFC and you can get them at -150. Lol. Vegas knows what it's doing giving the 2 hyped can't possibly lose teams at -150
Watch out for Dallas
0
Quote Originally Posted by BBGunzz:
@Danny9999 What would be the best way to apply your opinions on the Packers to sports betting? You are very confident that they will not win the NFC, are you going to bet the moneyline on their opponent in the Divisional round and then double down in the Championship round if the Packers advance regardless of opponents? I'm generally curious, I respect your approach that I've seen you take in other threads. Hearing what you think would be the best way to bet this would be more productive than just saying not to bet Packers at +160.
Sorry, heading to Vegas in an hour, missed this post.
I will definitely bet against them each game. They are going to lose in the NFC. A certain amount depending on who they play next week and then probably 3 times that if they happen to win next week.
Also, probably going to bet Dallas if I can find a good number. TB had a lot of injuries even before the AB situation.
Someone here posted you can get GB and TB to win NFC at -150. That is screaming fishy as fuk to me. Chic cardinals posted that these are the only 2 teams that matter in NFC and you can get them at -150. Lol. Vegas knows what it's doing giving the 2 hyped can't possibly lose teams at -150
@chic-cardinals Honest question... Do you suffer from OCD or another similar diagnosis? It must be a struggle to see patterns in randomness. I don't envy you.
Um....there's no randomness in specific numbers. You're the one who thinks outcomes are random. These out ones are decided well in advance.
0
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
@chic-cardinals Honest question... Do you suffer from OCD or another similar diagnosis? It must be a struggle to see patterns in randomness. I don't envy you.
Um....there's no randomness in specific numbers. You're the one who thinks outcomes are random. These out ones are decided well in advance.
Thanks, I appreciate your insight. I'm a Packers fan so I have too much emotionally invested in them already and won't be betting on or against them. Regardless, I do appreciate hearing how you would approach what you think will happen from a betting standpoint. Enjoy Vegas!
0
@Danny9999
Thanks, I appreciate your insight. I'm a Packers fan so I have too much emotionally invested in them already and won't be betting on or against them. Regardless, I do appreciate hearing how you would approach what you think will happen from a betting standpoint. Enjoy Vegas!
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: @Danny9999 Stop using reasonable insights vs numerology, no one here can beat Chic in an argument. Time and again,teams that move or build new stadiums end up in SBs or multiple years of playoffs just before or after. Time and again, the teams with more drama or media focus end up in SB. Raiders are swimming in both factors. How fast was Ruggs going? 156 mph..... Las Vegas Raiders lead series vs Chargers 67-56-2.....56, after last game in season. The LA Chargers host city has 56 wins all time vs the LV Raiders. 67 wins and 2 ties. The Raiders were in SB 2 ,after the 1967 season vs Packers 650,000=, amount of emails in the Gruden stuff lol. im assuming all this bullsh you threw out here adds up to 13?
I don't assume. That's why I know you're watching a predetermined event
0
Quote Originally Posted by BIGDTITLE:
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by undermysac: @Danny9999 Stop using reasonable insights vs numerology, no one here can beat Chic in an argument. Time and again,teams that move or build new stadiums end up in SBs or multiple years of playoffs just before or after. Time and again, the teams with more drama or media focus end up in SB. Raiders are swimming in both factors. How fast was Ruggs going? 156 mph..... Las Vegas Raiders lead series vs Chargers 67-56-2.....56, after last game in season. The LA Chargers host city has 56 wins all time vs the LV Raiders. 67 wins and 2 ties. The Raiders were in SB 2 ,after the 1967 season vs Packers 650,000=, amount of emails in the Gruden stuff lol. im assuming all this bullsh you threw out here adds up to 13?
I don't assume. That's why I know you're watching a predetermined event
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: @chic-cardinals Now, 0-3. Have you noticed the number 13 is all over the place this season. 1-3 is very likely. And +165? What super bowl year is this? 56. Are you even being serious about this ? No, I have not noticed the number 13 is all over the place. And you think the +165 is somehow because its superbowl 56 ? The Chiefs are -700 this weekend. Yet the Packers cannot, will not be higher than -225 in either game ( otherwise you cant get close to +165 ). The Linesmakers are Begging begging begging begging begging people to take the Packers. They aren't begging you to take a winner. +165 for a top seed that only has to win 2 home games and likely will get a WC in game 1. Thats nuts. The Seahawks have been top seed 3 times and have been - money every single time. -120, -140. Never +165. Thats nuts. Good luck chasing the public team, supposed great QB Aaron rodgers, top seed, home team that cant possibly lose because its "cold", and +165 to boot. What could possibly go wrong. next weekend the whole packers crowd will be screaming-- ITS ALL FIXED Yes, I realize You have absolutely no understanding of what's really happening You can't see obvious numerology clues right in your face. Fixed? It's fixed regardless who wins. Doesn't matter what fan base is disappointed. Lol you saw what happened in Baltimore, LA and LV. And Jags. And you still try to claim it's all natural.? Really?
Your "obvious" numerology clues failed you. And I had clear understanding of what was happening. When I saw GB +165 to win NFC is was obvious they wouldn't.
Russell Wilson ( he is sure no Rodgers) has been top seed twice, was minus money to win NFC both times.
If you are a serious contender, top seed would never be +165.
1
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: @chic-cardinals Now, 0-3. Have you noticed the number 13 is all over the place this season. 1-3 is very likely. And +165? What super bowl year is this? 56. Are you even being serious about this ? No, I have not noticed the number 13 is all over the place. And you think the +165 is somehow because its superbowl 56 ? The Chiefs are -700 this weekend. Yet the Packers cannot, will not be higher than -225 in either game ( otherwise you cant get close to +165 ). The Linesmakers are Begging begging begging begging begging people to take the Packers. They aren't begging you to take a winner. +165 for a top seed that only has to win 2 home games and likely will get a WC in game 1. Thats nuts. The Seahawks have been top seed 3 times and have been - money every single time. -120, -140. Never +165. Thats nuts. Good luck chasing the public team, supposed great QB Aaron rodgers, top seed, home team that cant possibly lose because its "cold", and +165 to boot. What could possibly go wrong. next weekend the whole packers crowd will be screaming-- ITS ALL FIXED Yes, I realize You have absolutely no understanding of what's really happening You can't see obvious numerology clues right in your face. Fixed? It's fixed regardless who wins. Doesn't matter what fan base is disappointed. Lol you saw what happened in Baltimore, LA and LV. And Jags. And you still try to claim it's all natural.? Really?
Your "obvious" numerology clues failed you. And I had clear understanding of what was happening. When I saw GB +165 to win NFC is was obvious they wouldn't.
Russell Wilson ( he is sure no Rodgers) has been top seed twice, was minus money to win NFC both times.
If you are a serious contender, top seed would never be +165.
Every game comes down to the last minute yet Buffalo is almost +200. TB +158 Dallas +172 despite playing the 3rd hardest schedule in NFL, but "no one else matters except TB and GB". Uh huh ok. GB has virtual identical numbers to all the NFC wildcard teams except they won a couple games more. Being in the worst division in the NFL will do that for you. The only angle GB backers have is they are at home, the frozen tundra, except for the fact that for over a decade now, they always end up losing even at home in the playoffs. And of course "numbers are meaningless", don't they have to be when your team has the worst numbers ? Everyone so ready to jump on the public team. It will work out how it usually does. But Mark my words - the Packers will lose in the NFC.
Not gonna be hearing from him tonight
1
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999:
Every game comes down to the last minute yet Buffalo is almost +200. TB +158 Dallas +172 despite playing the 3rd hardest schedule in NFL, but "no one else matters except TB and GB". Uh huh ok. GB has virtual identical numbers to all the NFC wildcard teams except they won a couple games more. Being in the worst division in the NFL will do that for you. The only angle GB backers have is they are at home, the frozen tundra, except for the fact that for over a decade now, they always end up losing even at home in the playoffs. And of course "numbers are meaningless", don't they have to be when your team has the worst numbers ? Everyone so ready to jump on the public team. It will work out how it usually does. But Mark my words - the Packers will lose in the NFC.
I’ll never get that 5 minutes back. Why did I even keep reading after the opener? Basically GB has no chance because they are +165??? If that’s how you pick these games you will never win money doing it.
I sure won money tonight. Lol.
Yeah if they hype a team through the freaking roof then give you better odds than top seeds generally get, that team is going to lose. Period.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Freddy66:
I’ll never get that 5 minutes back. Why did I even keep reading after the opener? Basically GB has no chance because they are +165??? If that’s how you pick these games you will never win money doing it.
I sure won money tonight. Lol.
Yeah if they hype a team through the freaking roof then give you better odds than top seeds generally get, that team is going to lose. Period.
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: If you bet Packers to win NFC, you are going to lose. To who? Unless it's the Bucs, no one else matters but those 2
1
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: If you bet Packers to win NFC, you are going to lose. To who? Unless it's the Bucs, no one else matters but those 2
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: If you bet Packers to win NFC, you are going to lose. To who? Unless it's the Bucs, no one else matters but those 2
############################
No one's denying this. Yes, it's obviously wrong.
It's called learning as you go ,as you've done in everything thing else, right?
That's one game. I also said Rams would win vs Bucs. I also said Titans will lose.
I did pick Bills though.
0
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: If you bet Packers to win NFC, you are going to lose. To who? Unless it's the Bucs, no one else matters but those 2
############################
No one's denying this. Yes, it's obviously wrong.
It's called learning as you go ,as you've done in everything thing else, right?
That's one game. I also said Rams would win vs Bucs. I also said Titans will lose.
Quote Originally Posted by Unclebenelli: @theclaw The differential is the QB. Notice the one-off is always a HOF QB, in this instance his name was Payton. Who constantly makes playoffs and gets number one seeds? Hall of fame QBs mostly. So it's not a good indicator.
So much for your HOF QB, point margin was a better indicator. Small point margin for a no. 1 seed is telling you Packers won't win SB And likely won't make it either.
1
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Quote Originally Posted by Unclebenelli: @theclaw The differential is the QB. Notice the one-off is always a HOF QB, in this instance his name was Payton. Who constantly makes playoffs and gets number one seeds? Hall of fame QBs mostly. So it's not a good indicator.
So much for your HOF QB, point margin was a better indicator. Small point margin for a no. 1 seed is telling you Packers won't win SB And likely won't make it either.
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: Quote Originally Posted by bestfightstory: Could you rephrase that? Yes I can rephrase it. If you bet Packers to win NFC, you are going to lose. To who? Unless it's the Bucs, no one else matters but those 2
Wrong again
1
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: Quote Originally Posted by bestfightstory: Could you rephrase that? Yes I can rephrase it. If you bet Packers to win NFC, you are going to lose. To who? Unless it's the Bucs, no one else matters but those 2
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: Quote Originally Posted by bestfightstory: Could you rephrase that? Yes I can rephrase it. If you bet Packers to win NFC, you are going to lose. To who? Unless it's the Bucs, no one else matters but those 2 Well if that were true, you wouldn't see this Odds to win NFC Packers + 165 Buccs +350 Those are not lines you would ever get in a 2 team race. All gambling us based on lying for profit. You think they are going to tell you the truth? Furthermore, what the hell are you talking about? None if the other teams matter unless maybe Dallas dies something. The conference Championship will be Packers vs somebody.
Wrong again
1
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: Quote Originally Posted by bestfightstory: Could you rephrase that? Yes I can rephrase it. If you bet Packers to win NFC, you are going to lose. To who? Unless it's the Bucs, no one else matters but those 2 Well if that were true, you wouldn't see this Odds to win NFC Packers + 165 Buccs +350 Those are not lines you would ever get in a 2 team race. All gambling us based on lying for profit. You think they are going to tell you the truth? Furthermore, what the hell are you talking about? None if the other teams matter unless maybe Dallas dies something. The conference Championship will be Packers vs somebody.
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: Quote Originally Posted by bestfightstory: Could you rephrase that? Yes I can rephrase it. If you bet Packers to win NFC, you are going to lose. To who? Unless it's the Bucs, no one else matters but those 2 Well if that were true, you wouldn't see this Odds to win NFC Packers + 165 Buccs +350 Those are not lines you would ever get in a 2 team race. All gambling us based on lying for profit. You think they are going to tell you the truth? Furthermore, what the hell are you talking about? None if the other teams matter unless maybe Dallas dies something. The conference Championship will be Packers vs somebody. So you think you can just take Packers +165 to win NFC, then wait for NFC championship game and you have the favorite at +165. You think it's that easy ? No way a top seed is gonna be +165 if they have much of a chance to win. That's the same as what KC is and they have to win 3 games, maybe 1 on the road. Any time the Seahawks ever got top seed, no way in hell you were getting them at +165. You automatically rule out Rams, Niners, Arizona, Philly. All these teams have same scoring differential as GB and they all played stronger schedules than GB per NFL SOS Rankings. This Packers team is gonna to lose in the NFC. There are several teams this weekend with big ML. KC is -700, TB -450, Cin -300. GB at +165 means they won't be higher than -200 in first game ( likely against WC team ) You think Vegas is just trying to help you out or posting a juicy number on a team they know is madly overrated ? GB at +165 plays out at like -200 game 1 then -125 game 2 KC is -700 then -350 then -130. I know a lot of people here bet on emotions, nothing can be done, they will just have to lose. But if some could put emotions aside, it's obvious the GB number is telling something. It would appear you're letting the numbers sway your" emotions. Point differential? That's meaningless now, with every game coming down to the last minute even if one team is far superior to the other All your number crunching is meaningless. Vegas help you out? I just told you it's all a lie. Who gets all the press and commercials? Packers. Mcarthy sucks as a coach. The Rams have no clue what they are doing. The cards qb throws the ball all over the place. The eagles.....just suck.
Wrong again, point margin wasn't meaningless
1
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals: Quote Originally Posted by Danny9999: Quote Originally Posted by bestfightstory: Could you rephrase that? Yes I can rephrase it. If you bet Packers to win NFC, you are going to lose. To who? Unless it's the Bucs, no one else matters but those 2 Well if that were true, you wouldn't see this Odds to win NFC Packers + 165 Buccs +350 Those are not lines you would ever get in a 2 team race. All gambling us based on lying for profit. You think they are going to tell you the truth? Furthermore, what the hell are you talking about? None if the other teams matter unless maybe Dallas dies something. The conference Championship will be Packers vs somebody. So you think you can just take Packers +165 to win NFC, then wait for NFC championship game and you have the favorite at +165. You think it's that easy ? No way a top seed is gonna be +165 if they have much of a chance to win. That's the same as what KC is and they have to win 3 games, maybe 1 on the road. Any time the Seahawks ever got top seed, no way in hell you were getting them at +165. You automatically rule out Rams, Niners, Arizona, Philly. All these teams have same scoring differential as GB and they all played stronger schedules than GB per NFL SOS Rankings. This Packers team is gonna to lose in the NFC. There are several teams this weekend with big ML. KC is -700, TB -450, Cin -300. GB at +165 means they won't be higher than -200 in first game ( likely against WC team ) You think Vegas is just trying to help you out or posting a juicy number on a team they know is madly overrated ? GB at +165 plays out at like -200 game 1 then -125 game 2 KC is -700 then -350 then -130. I know a lot of people here bet on emotions, nothing can be done, they will just have to lose. But if some could put emotions aside, it's obvious the GB number is telling something. It would appear you're letting the numbers sway your" emotions. Point differential? That's meaningless now, with every game coming down to the last minute even if one team is far superior to the other All your number crunching is meaningless. Vegas help you out? I just told you it's all a lie. Who gets all the press and commercials? Packers. Mcarthy sucks as a coach. The Rams have no clue what they are doing. The cards qb throws the ball all over the place. The eagles.....just suck.
Being in the worst division in the NFL will do that for you ############### You mean like the Patriots for 20 years? They never got any challenge from their division. Strength of division is irrelevant. I just told you every game is coming down to last two minutes ,so strength of schedule is also irrelevant. Who are you trying to convince of what? Dallas' division sucked as well. You go where the controversy is. Right now,. It's GB and LV
Wrong again
1
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:
Being in the worst division in the NFL will do that for you ############### You mean like the Patriots for 20 years? They never got any challenge from their division. Strength of division is irrelevant. I just told you every game is coming down to last two minutes ,so strength of schedule is also irrelevant. Who are you trying to convince of what? Dallas' division sucked as well. You go where the controversy is. Right now,. It's GB and LV
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
