The Squares are awesome !!!!!!

Green Bay -14 

Baltimore   -7 

Atlanta  -3.5 

Philly  -3 

Chicago  -1 (was -5.5 at one point) 

Oakland  -6.5 

The favorites are 7-4-1 so far this week.   

Home favs 6-3

Road favs 1-1  

  (Bills - Giants was a push according to my stats,  some of you might have won with the Bills who were +5 at some places at one point.   Some people may have pushed with Cleveland also if you got +7. ) 

 Sharps  -    "every game is a trap"     4-7-1  

worthless post

Hang out on this site for 5 years and you will get very sick of hearing the words "trap",  "public side" , "square" , etc.  

  

Just about every F'n game some genius on here will call it a trap and act like you're a complete dumbazz if you bet the other side.      

Way overrused words if you ask me.      

Greyhound

People with AIDS   

Greyhound off topic and i am not trying to bait you.  But when do we start talking about a 16-0 season for your Pack.  They seem to be just toying with teams.  They way the Lions played yesterday if they play that way against the Pack you will eat us alive.  Once again not trying to bait you here but i think it is a realistic question they look awful good and only play hard enough to win at this point.

I like it, keep posting this.

think Phins cover tonight though.

Why does it matter?   

If you go 16-0 and lose in the playoffs have you accomplished anything?   

I couldn't care less if they go 16-0.    

Besides that they have problems on Defense.   Nick Collins out for the season.   The secondary getting torched every game.   

Your bias is amazing.  I agree the word is thrown out far too often, and in general the "squares" have been having a very strong year, but not all these games are divided equally among bettors.  7-4, or 4-7 doesn't mean the books got killed the same on losses or won the same on wins.  Your selectivity is pretty keen though, quality stuff leaving off:

Cowboys and under 56

9ers +5.5

Oakland openin -7, not 6.5, which i'd say is the number the greater portion of bettors on that side received.

My question to you...why do you link sharps with 11 underdogs?  You think they picked against every favorite yesterday?  B/c I don't.  In fact, I'd say only the bears and birds even were mentioned yesterday as sucker lines that i heard at all...

This isn't an us against them debate, idk why people make it out to be.

 

 

Sorry i asked.

That's the point of this thread and NO I don't think the sharps are always on the dog.      The Packers were definitely considered a trap on Covers at least from what I saw.   

Stupid post, all the squares were buried with Bills ML, Saints and Lions and all the Unders.

Btw, you don't even know what's square or sharp as Carolina was the more public play not Atlanta.

It was the sharps who moved the Philly line.

Not sure where you even get your numbers from....

Public only had 4 wins, oakland is a push.

Like wtf are you talking about, seriously....

Jax covered, Niners covered, Cincy covered, Dallas covered, Tampa Bay covered, that's five right there.

You probably forgot Colts were the square play, public road dog automatic loss.

 

How'd the Rams work out for you genius?   

Why would I take the Rams? I rarely play spreads like that.

btw, Public is 32-42 for the season so far.

Sorry, it was BigNiner who made that thread about the Rams.   LINK

You have 'Niner" in your name so I thought it was you.   

Where are you getting all the numbers from to back up these statements your making?   

I love all this talk about sharps and squares. This site is probably 95% squares. 

It would be great if you could tell me how you know this. 

It is not worthless.  Me and my buddies where actually talking about this yesterday.  It fucking dumb to make or not make a play based on square or sharp play.  Like I said yesterday.  If betting G.B. and others makes me a square, then let me have 4 right angles motha fucka!

I have a personal database I keep.  Lot of work.

Lots of interesting tidbits.

OK, you have a database.   You still have to have numbers to fill up that database.     Where do you get the numbers about which side the public is on that you put in that database?   

This place just cracks me up. 

I keep a database

No mention of how he knows, but he keeps a database. 

There is a HUGE difference when there are numerous games going on throughout the day but when there is only one NFL game and some nonsense hockey action that no one cares about it's a different situation.