Green Bay -14 
Baltimore -7
Atlanta -3.5
Philly -3
Chicago -1 (was -5.5 at one point)
Oakland -6.5
The favorites are 7-4-1 so far this week.
Home favs 6-3
Road favs 1-1
(Bills - Giants was a push according to my stats, some of you might have won with the Bills who were +5 at some places at one point. Some people may have pushed with Cleveland also if you got +7. )
Sharps - "every game is a trap" 4-7-1 
Hang out on this site for 5 years and you will get very sick of hearing the words "trap", "public side" , "square" , etc. 
Just about every F'n game some genius on here will call it a trap and act like you're a complete dumbazz if you bet the other side. 
Way overrused words if you ask me. 
Greyhound off topic and i am not trying to bait you. But when do we start talking about a 16-0 season for your Pack. They seem to be just toying with teams. They way the Lions played yesterday if they play that way against the Pack you will eat us alive. Once again not trying to bait you here but i think it is a realistic question they look awful good and only play hard enough to win at this point.
Greyhound off topic and i am not trying to bait you. But when do we start talking about a 16-0 season for your Pack. They seem to be just toying with teams. They way the Lions played yesterday if they play that way against the Pack you will eat us alive. Once again not trying to bait you here but i think it is a realistic question they look awful good and only play hard enough to win at this point.
Why does it matter? 
If you go 16-0 and lose in the playoffs have you accomplished anything? 
I couldn't care less if they go 16-0.
Besides that they have problems on Defense. Nick Collins out for the season. The secondary getting torched every game.
Your bias is amazing. I agree the word is thrown out far too often, and in general the "squares" have been having a very strong year, but not all these games are divided equally among bettors. 7-4, or 4-7 doesn't mean the books got killed the same on losses or won the same on wins. Your selectivity is pretty keen though, quality stuff leaving off:
Cowboys and under 56
9ers +5.5
Oakland openin -7, not 6.5, which i'd say is the number the greater portion of bettors on that side received.
My question to you...why do you link sharps with 11 underdogs? You think they picked against every favorite yesterday? B/c I don't. In fact, I'd say only the bears and birds even were mentioned yesterday as sucker lines that i heard at all...
This isn't an us against them debate, idk why people make it out to be.
Why does it matter?
If you go 16-0 and lose in the playoffs have you accomplished anything?
I couldn't care less if they go 16-0.
Besides that they have problems on Defense. Nick Collins out for the season. The secondary getting torched every game.
Sorry i asked.
I agree the word is thrown out far too often, and in general the "squares" have been having a very strong year
That's the point of this thread and NO I don't think the sharps are always on the dog. The Packers were definitely considered a trap on Covers at least from what I saw.
How'd the Rams work out for you genius? 
It is not worthless. Me and my buddies where actually talking about this yesterday. It fucking dumb to make or not make a play based on square or sharp play. Like I said yesterday. If betting G.B. and others makes me a square, then let me have 4 right angles motha fucka!
OK, you have a database. You still have to have numbers to fill up that database. Where do you get the numbers about which side the public is on that you put in that database?
OK, you have a database. You still have to have numbers to fill up that database. Where do you get the numbers about which side the public is on that you put in that database?
This place just cracks me up.
I keep a database
No mention of how he knows, but he keeps a database. 
Established in 1995,
I like it, keep posting this.
Hot Forum Topics
