I'm going to do something I rarely do now..I'm going to personally guarantee all these picks here today...and furthermore I'm putting my entire reputation here on these selections...
How is this personal guarentee working out?
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
Quote Originally Posted by Super_Camel:
ALRIGHT THAT'S IT!
I'm going to do something I rarely do now..I'm going to personally guarantee all these picks here today...and furthermore I'm putting my entire reputation here on these selections...
Dumbass how does Vegas make money if 80% of the money is on the winning side? They catch 10% vig on 20% that lost. Simple f'on math. And your on 3 of these plays. Please change your name to donkey. Vegas preys on donkeys like you
0
Dumbass how does Vegas make money if 80% of the money is on the winning side? They catch 10% vig on 20% that lost. Simple f'on math. And your on 3 of these plays. Please change your name to donkey. Vegas preys on donkeys like you
Camel you have no respect because you went 3-15 before you stopped tracking your first record, and you famously clowned that guy's 58% lifetime record because you said, and I quote: 'he was just spinning his wheels because that's only 8% money won'.
You duck and hide from everyone who calls you out on your 'forgotten', 'restarted', tweaked and fudged records.
You thought 58% winrate was a losing record, that over 5 years the guy would only have 8% of his money. You then hid and ran when everyone laughed at that absolute fail of common sense and math, too.
That's why no one respects you. You're a clueless loud-mouthed clown who's been put in his place so many times that you've got no reputation left to lose.
Now go throw another laughing head in response, once again avoid the question of your remedial math trolling, and keep twisting every record to hide the fact you're a long-term loser.
How on earth this idiot continues to be able to post on here when you consider who's been banned lately is just unbelievable.
0
Camel you have no respect because you went 3-15 before you stopped tracking your first record, and you famously clowned that guy's 58% lifetime record because you said, and I quote: 'he was just spinning his wheels because that's only 8% money won'.
You duck and hide from everyone who calls you out on your 'forgotten', 'restarted', tweaked and fudged records.
You thought 58% winrate was a losing record, that over 5 years the guy would only have 8% of his money. You then hid and ran when everyone laughed at that absolute fail of common sense and math, too.
That's why no one respects you. You're a clueless loud-mouthed clown who's been put in his place so many times that you've got no reputation left to lose.
Now go throw another laughing head in response, once again avoid the question of your remedial math trolling, and keep twisting every record to hide the fact you're a long-term loser.
How on earth this idiot continues to be able to post on here when you consider who's been banned lately is just unbelievable.
Dumbass how does Vegas make money if 80% of the money is on the winning side? They catch 10% vig on 20% that lost. Simple f'on math. And your on 3 of these plays. Please change your name to donkey. Vegas preys on donkeys like you
where the F*** are you getting the information that 80% of total money wagered is on one side or the other????..i've never,ever heard of any site or service that will provide that information...please,i beg of you.where can i find this stuff??
im gonna go out on a limb and say that not only is it not available anywhere,but will NEVER,EVER be made available by books or otherwise.
making statements like this eliminates all credibility that you may have had...and you take shots at camel for making stuff up and talking shi.t.....jeeeez
0
Quote Originally Posted by gtnp:
Dumbass how does Vegas make money if 80% of the money is on the winning side? They catch 10% vig on 20% that lost. Simple f'on math. And your on 3 of these plays. Please change your name to donkey. Vegas preys on donkeys like you
where the F*** are you getting the information that 80% of total money wagered is on one side or the other????..i've never,ever heard of any site or service that will provide that information...please,i beg of you.where can i find this stuff??
im gonna go out on a limb and say that not only is it not available anywhere,but will NEVER,EVER be made available by books or otherwise.
making statements like this eliminates all credibility that you may have had...and you take shots at camel for making stuff up and talking shi.t.....jeeeez
melossinglet its cute how you come to camels defense. But what dont you understand?
Ofcourse theres all kinds of websites that show you where and how many bets are being placed and on who, your on one that does. Covers shows how many picks are on what side, why is this so hard to do or understand? Dont horse tracks show you wagers made on what horse and how much money is on each horse? If you dont believe it you dont have to, but hows this blow my credibility. And before you say it i will, they probably arent exact numbers but they are pretty close cause each site usually shows about the same %'s. And your boy is on 3 of the biggest public plays sunday!
0
melossinglet its cute how you come to camels defense. But what dont you understand?
Ofcourse theres all kinds of websites that show you where and how many bets are being placed and on who, your on one that does. Covers shows how many picks are on what side, why is this so hard to do or understand? Dont horse tracks show you wagers made on what horse and how much money is on each horse? If you dont believe it you dont have to, but hows this blow my credibility. And before you say it i will, they probably arent exact numbers but they are pretty close cause each site usually shows about the same %'s. And your boy is on 3 of the biggest public plays sunday!
And the only reason i "take shots" at camel is to make sure he stays exploited for his lies. Alot of people come to covers for expert advice and i feel bad if they stumbled on his thread and bought into his baloni. If you like the guys picks thats your problem, dont say i didnt tryand warn ya
0
And the only reason i "take shots" at camel is to make sure he stays exploited for his lies. Alot of people come to covers for expert advice and i feel bad if they stumbled on his thread and bought into his baloni. If you like the guys picks thats your problem, dont say i didnt tryand warn ya
melossinglet its cute how you come to camels defense. But what dont you understand?
Ofcourse theres all kinds of websites that show you where and how many bets are being placed and on who, your on one that does. Covers shows how many picks are on what side, why is this so hard to do or understand? Dont horse tracks show you wagers made on what horse and how much money is on each horse? If you dont believe it you dont have to, but hows this blow my credibility. And before you say it i will, they probably arent exact numbers but they are pretty close cause each site usually shows about the same %'s. And your boy is on 3 of the biggest public plays sunday!
i aint coming to anyones "defense" you dunce..im questioning YOU and the false information you posted....ya know,to "protect all the poor,innocent,little gamblers that mite fall for your baloni and get "exploited",hahaha.
all those websites and services show the NUMBER OF BETS/TICKETS on one side or another,they dont show AMOUNT OF MONEY wagered...theres a HUUUUUUUUUUGEEEEE FUK.ING difference,can you not see that????
thats the whole point wen people in here ramble on and on about "reverse line movement"...they see 80% of bets on one side and yet the line moves against them from -2.5 to -1.0 or watever the case may be.....so those % are indicative of nothing in many cases.
who knows,the side that camel,or anyone for that matter,is on may have far less actual money on it even tho you are seeing 75%+ on the charts you are looking at.
this is basic,basic stuff...for sumone that comes across as sooooo clever and condescending to others it is shocking that you arent aware of this
0
Quote Originally Posted by gtnp:
melossinglet its cute how you come to camels defense. But what dont you understand?
Ofcourse theres all kinds of websites that show you where and how many bets are being placed and on who, your on one that does. Covers shows how many picks are on what side, why is this so hard to do or understand? Dont horse tracks show you wagers made on what horse and how much money is on each horse? If you dont believe it you dont have to, but hows this blow my credibility. And before you say it i will, they probably arent exact numbers but they are pretty close cause each site usually shows about the same %'s. And your boy is on 3 of the biggest public plays sunday!
i aint coming to anyones "defense" you dunce..im questioning YOU and the false information you posted....ya know,to "protect all the poor,innocent,little gamblers that mite fall for your baloni and get "exploited",hahaha.
all those websites and services show the NUMBER OF BETS/TICKETS on one side or another,they dont show AMOUNT OF MONEY wagered...theres a HUUUUUUUUUUGEEEEE FUK.ING difference,can you not see that????
thats the whole point wen people in here ramble on and on about "reverse line movement"...they see 80% of bets on one side and yet the line moves against them from -2.5 to -1.0 or watever the case may be.....so those % are indicative of nothing in many cases.
who knows,the side that camel,or anyone for that matter,is on may have far less actual money on it even tho you are seeing 75%+ on the charts you are looking at.
this is basic,basic stuff...for sumone that comes across as sooooo clever and condescending to others it is shocking that you arent aware of this
listen bud i understand the difference of # of bets placed and total money wagered. MAybe i mispoke above but what i was replying to was camel saying vegas wants 50/50 on boths sides and they collect the 10% vig, i understand how this all works, been doing it for 30 years now! im 46 fwiw. What i was trying to say is when 80% of wagers placed are on 1 side they dont collect 10%. they either collect 10% and the 60% difference on wagers placed, this could be a huge variable depending on the size of each of these wagers. All im saying is camel has picked 3 of the biggest public attractive favorites on the board, do you follow what im saying now?
0
listen bud i understand the difference of # of bets placed and total money wagered. MAybe i mispoke above but what i was replying to was camel saying vegas wants 50/50 on boths sides and they collect the 10% vig, i understand how this all works, been doing it for 30 years now! im 46 fwiw. What i was trying to say is when 80% of wagers placed are on 1 side they dont collect 10%. they either collect 10% and the 60% difference on wagers placed, this could be a huge variable depending on the size of each of these wagers. All im saying is camel has picked 3 of the biggest public attractive favorites on the board, do you follow what im saying now?
listen bud i understand the difference of # of bets placed and total money wagered. MAybe i mispoke above but what i was replying to was camel saying vegas wants 50/50 on boths sides and they collect the 10% vig, i understand how this all works, been doing it for 30 years now! im 46 fwiw. What i was trying to say is when 80% of wagers placed are on 1 side they dont collect 10%. they either collect 10% and the 60% difference on wagers placed, this could be a huge variable depending on the size of each of these wagers. All im saying is camel has picked 3 of the biggest public attractive favorites on the board, do you follow what im saying now?
yep,i know exactly wat youre saying...and wat youre saying is completely worthless and pointless....who gives a flying f**k if 80% of bets are on the side that hes taking??for all we know,more $$$ could be on the other side or it cud be evenly split,or it could be on his side..who knows????wat possible difference does it make if sumones picks are the same as wat many of the public are taking??some will win,some wont.are you saying that all you need to do to be profitable is look for any game where consensus public is over 80% and then simply bet against them??cos im pretty sure that rubbish has been tried before and would be break-even at best.
obviously theyre favourites for the game,but theyre at dog money for the runline..ie.they are NOT favoured to cover the runline...why does it matter??its pretty simple isnt it??
who gives a crap,its just a term-"dog" means +money ...why bicker over semantics??...we're both too old to waste time on such silliness
0
Quote Originally Posted by gtnp:
listen bud i understand the difference of # of bets placed and total money wagered. MAybe i mispoke above but what i was replying to was camel saying vegas wants 50/50 on boths sides and they collect the 10% vig, i understand how this all works, been doing it for 30 years now! im 46 fwiw. What i was trying to say is when 80% of wagers placed are on 1 side they dont collect 10%. they either collect 10% and the 60% difference on wagers placed, this could be a huge variable depending on the size of each of these wagers. All im saying is camel has picked 3 of the biggest public attractive favorites on the board, do you follow what im saying now?
yep,i know exactly wat youre saying...and wat youre saying is completely worthless and pointless....who gives a flying f**k if 80% of bets are on the side that hes taking??for all we know,more $$$ could be on the other side or it cud be evenly split,or it could be on his side..who knows????wat possible difference does it make if sumones picks are the same as wat many of the public are taking??some will win,some wont.are you saying that all you need to do to be profitable is look for any game where consensus public is over 80% and then simply bet against them??cos im pretty sure that rubbish has been tried before and would be break-even at best.
obviously theyre favourites for the game,but theyre at dog money for the runline..ie.they are NOT favoured to cover the runline...why does it matter??its pretty simple isnt it??
who gives a crap,its just a term-"dog" means +money ...why bicker over semantics??...we're both too old to waste time on such silliness
80% on public means crap...if Ralph and Jose and 78 of his friends bets $10.00 public plays. But Bill Gates and Mayweather bets 10k and his 18 friends...you think Vegas wins because there are only 20 of them versus 80 ??
Its the amount of the bet in ($) not the amount of people betting.
80% on public means crap...if Ralph and Jose and 78 of his friends bets $10.00 public plays. But Bill Gates and Mayweather bets 10k and his 18 friends...you think Vegas wins because there are only 20 of them versus 80 ??
Its the amount of the bet in ($) not the amount of people betting.
Thaistix thought I said same thing in my last post, but the example you just posted is an extreme one and surely doesn't happen often although could and we wouldn't know one way or the other. However we do know that 80% of people making the wager are on that side and this is a useful tool if used properly, along with other factors. If you ignore public %'s your cutting yourself short. Public perception is a very useful tool specially if lines are inflated and/or short. Do yourself a favor and track to see how many of these 80% favs cover this weekend. It's not the only factor I use before making my selections but it is a very useful tool.and btw your example of meriweather large plays, from what I seen posted his plays are typically on these heavy public plays anyways!
Goodluck today$
0
Thaistix thought I said same thing in my last post, but the example you just posted is an extreme one and surely doesn't happen often although could and we wouldn't know one way or the other. However we do know that 80% of people making the wager are on that side and this is a useful tool if used properly, along with other factors. If you ignore public %'s your cutting yourself short. Public perception is a very useful tool specially if lines are inflated and/or short. Do yourself a favor and track to see how many of these 80% favs cover this weekend. It's not the only factor I use before making my selections but it is a very useful tool.and btw your example of meriweather large plays, from what I seen posted his plays are typically on these heavy public plays anyways!
where the F*** are you getting the information that 80% of total money wagered is on one side or the other????..i've never,ever heard of any site or service that will provide that information...please,i beg of you.where can i find this stuff??
im gonna go out on a limb and say that not only is it not available anywhere,but will NEVER,EVER be made available by books or otherwise.
making statements like this eliminates all credibility that you may have had...and you take shots at camel for making stuff up and talking shi.t.....jeeeez
I know..it's absurd...all the books are reporting what people are betting on..?
Good post
0
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
where the F*** are you getting the information that 80% of total money wagered is on one side or the other????..i've never,ever heard of any site or service that will provide that information...please,i beg of you.where can i find this stuff??
im gonna go out on a limb and say that not only is it not available anywhere,but will NEVER,EVER be made available by books or otherwise.
making statements like this eliminates all credibility that you may have had...and you take shots at camel for making stuff up and talking shi.t.....jeeeez
I know..it's absurd...all the books are reporting what people are betting on..?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.