Appreciate you posting picks, Van. Someone who gets it!
A couple of thoughts...
I have a lot of issues with the Rams playcalling and game strategy. The last drive of the first half.... They had 4th and 2 at the 11, with 1:04 on the clock. That is a must go for it situation because if you make it, you kill all chances of Seattle getting a possession. Not to mention on a running clock before the 2 minute warning they hurried up to get a play off for no reason when they should have been in time killing mode.
Then the runs on their last drive. It is OK to run - but you should pass when Sea thinks you are going to run. Sea was clearly selling out on the run, so the Rams run on first, run on second, throw on third. Very predictable.
The double punt play was a complete f up by the refs and a very big play in the game.
Close game - was glad to have -2.
Thats about 10 wins in a row for me, all posted free of charge for you degens because I love you so much.
A couple of thoughts...
I have a lot of issues with the Rams playcalling and game strategy. The last drive of the first half.... They had 4th and 2 at the 11, with 1:04 on the clock. That is a must go for it situation because if you make it, you kill all chances of Seattle getting a possession. Not to mention on a running clock before the 2 minute warning they hurried up to get a play off for no reason when they should have been in time killing mode.
Then the runs on their last drive. It is OK to run - but you should pass when Sea thinks you are going to run. Sea was clearly selling out on the run, so the Rams run on first, run on second, throw on third. Very predictable.
The double punt play was a complete f up by the refs and a very big play in the game.
Close game - was glad to have -2.
Thats about 10 wins in a row for me, all posted free of charge for you degens because I love you so much.
The Seahawks are one of these teams (like the Raiders) that just aren't happy taking what the defense gives them. They probably could have dinked and dunked for 5-8 yards per play all night, but they insist on going vertical which is very high risk high reward when there is no need to.
Simple things like this are the difference between winning and losing in the NFL.
The Seahawks are one of these teams (like the Raiders) that just aren't happy taking what the defense gives them. They probably could have dinked and dunked for 5-8 yards per play all night, but they insist on going vertical which is very high risk high reward when there is no need to.
Simple things like this are the difference between winning and losing in the NFL.
@vanzack
lol love you too!
why didn't he challenge the double punt?
I sold some of my rams bet bc of that bs.
Side note: Geno looked good. Seattle may be getting some calls.
@vanzack
lol love you too!
why didn't he challenge the double punt?
I sold some of my rams bet bc of that bs.
Side note: Geno looked good. Seattle may be getting some calls.
It must be an unchallengeable play. Probably on page 11,328 of the NFL rulebook.
Geno did look good - but keep in mind - the defense didn't have time to gameplan him. Wait until a team has a week to do that (if Wilson is still out next game - I think away at the Steelers).
It must be an unchallengeable play. Probably on page 11,328 of the NFL rulebook.
Geno did look good - but keep in mind - the defense didn't have time to gameplan him. Wait until a team has a week to do that (if Wilson is still out next game - I think away at the Steelers).
Quote Originally Posted by Nedtan: Your capping skills and work ethic are inspiring. Nailing the margin of victory. Undisputed. - Random degen
Perhaps that guy from the other night should listen to Vanzack's advice!
Quote Originally Posted by Nedtan: Your capping skills and work ethic are inspiring. Nailing the margin of victory. Undisputed. - Random degen
Perhaps that guy from the other night should listen to Vanzack's advice!
BTW - this is the 4th down play I was talking about late in the first half.
Huge mathematical advantage by going for it instead of kicking the FG.
https://twitter.com/ben_bot_baldwin/status/1446286765166313473
BTW - this is the 4th down play I was talking about late in the first half.
Huge mathematical advantage by going for it instead of kicking the FG.
https://twitter.com/ben_bot_baldwin/status/1446286765166313473
My guess is that McVey wanted a chip shot FG rather than risk going into half with a zero on the board. did not watch game, but the Play by Play looks like they had a good sustained drive, and he probably wanted something to show for it.
Full agree if LAR do get it, huge, but if they are stopped, clock stops on Downs, Sea gets ball with 2 TO's left. Even if Sea kneels, they are up 7-0 into halftime, and they get the ball to start the 3rd Q.
Conservative, yes, but I am not that surprised he took the points.
Keep up the good run! you're killing it!
My guess is that McVey wanted a chip shot FG rather than risk going into half with a zero on the board. did not watch game, but the Play by Play looks like they had a good sustained drive, and he probably wanted something to show for it.
Full agree if LAR do get it, huge, but if they are stopped, clock stops on Downs, Sea gets ball with 2 TO's left. Even if Sea kneels, they are up 7-0 into halftime, and they get the ball to start the 3rd Q.
Conservative, yes, but I am not that surprised he took the points.
Keep up the good run! you're killing it!
Nothing but love here, Mr. Vanzack. I had Rams myself, for some of the talking points you mentioned.
Definitely, great knowledge here gents and gals.
I also read about your MOMENTUM info on another post.
You should change your name to Vanstacks , some of us degenerates would agree !!!!
Nothing but love here, Mr. Vanzack. I had Rams myself, for some of the talking points you mentioned.
Definitely, great knowledge here gents and gals.
I also read about your MOMENTUM info on another post.
You should change your name to Vanstacks , some of us degenerates would agree !!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.