All Forums | NFL Betting

To all The MaHomer’s taking KC because of the QB

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4195
Posts: 87
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 4778
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:

You’ll never learn. You’re already a loser. Put your money aside for the man and enjoy the game. 
gl 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2014
Posts: 48287
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:

had he not dislocated his kneecap, he would have been in running for MVP

==========================

That was  a fake injury  to begin with. He was paid to fall down. I'm guessing  he gets injured  in super bowl  as well


It was clearly shown on the field when the trainers popped his knee cap back in place
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2015
Posts: 7814
Posted: #28

Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:

Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:

had he not dislocated his kneecap, he would have been in running for MVP ========================== That was  a fake injury  to begin with. He was paid to fall down. I'm guessing  he gets injured  in super bowl  as well
It was clearly shown on the field when the trainers popped his knee cap back in place

Sorry, you can not  say you exactly saw any such thing. You not literally see his knee nor know his actual condition.   It doesn't even matter .injuries happen  like in wrestling. It's still staged and Chiefs are still losing 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 7360
Posted: #29

Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:

Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:

Gentlemen.... please pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.  Chicky Man is just here to rowel up everyone with his "Mahomes is Cam" non sense (now he's throwing in Vick and Randle comparisons ).  Although he talks like someone who has never seen Mahomes play (or any other HOF QB), rest assured he is just poking the bear and doing his best at stirring the pot.   "Mahomes is promoted to the black community no doubt" - wtf is this???  This is a new one for Chicky Man and just another example of what Chic's goal is on here, which is to say the most off the wall sh** you can come up with in hopes of getting attention for himself and raising other people's blood pressure.  I can't imagine he actually thinks all this non sense.   The sports as pure entertainment BS is actually the closest thing to reality he ever even talks about.  "Don't believe everything you see and read in the media"  aka don't be a sheep to ESPN and the rest....That is the only message he attempts to convey that is actually anywhere remotely to factual truth.  The rest of it you can flush down the toilet.
===========#///# My view is different  from yours. Get the fuck over it. You choose to feel poked. I'm an adult  with 3 decades of sports viewing  historical  wisdom and experience . Mahomes will be a great promotion for nfl and all. But he'll be nothing like a Marino over time. The league will always make sure a white guy is number one. Mahomes will lose this SB. Go back in your corner  and sit down.

Lmao, I've been polite up to this point and wanted to see how Chicky Man would react to a little pressure.... safe to say I can comfortably put my 3 decades of sports viewing historical wisdom and experience up against yours without any worry....I'll leave you with one more and then go back to not responding to Chicky Man...you are correct, Mahomes will be nothing like Marino over time....he will have at least one ring when all is said and done.  Peace out homey.  

America First
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2014
Posts: 48287
Posted: #30

https://mobile.twitter.com/pff_sam/status/1185001867161620480

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 7360
Posted: #31

Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:

https://mobile.twitter.com/pff_sam/status/1185001867161620480

Man, didn't you know already that not only is Chicky Man the world's greatest evaluator of NFL quarterbacks in the history of the world, he is also Dr. James Andrews reincarnate.  There is no one on this site with anywhere near the knowledge and insight of the great Chicky Man....wait for it, Chicky Head is gonna come back in here saying that the knee cap that dislocated and was sitting on the side of his knee was actually a "hollywood" style injury engineered by the grand photo shop expertise of the video crew in the booth an_popcorn  

America First
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 8593
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by ActionMagnet:

Mahomes greatest strength is getting outside the pocket and waiting on one of his speedsters to come back to the ball for a strike. He’s not the runner that Jackson is, he’s not the runner that Russell Wilson is. The Niners and Saleh will game plan to keep him in the pocket while collapsing the middle of that pocket vs the weak and short interior Oline of KC. Armstead and Buckner will wreck this game, not Bosa and Ford. I can’t F N Wait.

Like Pesci said in My Cousin Vinnie - “ line

Search Results

Featured snippet from the web

Vinny: When you look at the bricks from the right angle, they're as thin as this playing card. His whole case is an illusion, a magic trick. It has to be an illusion, 'cause you're innocent. Nobody - I mean nobody - pulls the wool over the eyes of a Gambini, especially this one.”
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 1300
Posted: #33

Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:

Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:

Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:

had he not dislocated his kneecap, he would have been in running for MVP ========================== That was  a fake injury  to begin with. He was paid to fall down. I'm guessing  he gets injured  in super bowl  as well
It was clearly shown on the field when the trainers popped his knee cap back in place
Sorry, you can not  say you exactly saw any such thing. You not literally see his knee nor know his actual condition.   It doesn't even matter .injuries happen  like in wrestling. It's still staged and Chiefs are still losing

 

damn you just get dumber and dumber with every post!

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2015
Posts: 7814
Posted: #34

Quote Originally Posted by richwins81:

Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:

Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:

Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:

had he not dislocated his kneecap, he would have been in running for MVP ========================== That was  a fake injury  to begin with. He was paid to fall down. I'm guessing  he gets injured  in super bowl  as well
It was clearly shown on the field when the trainers popped his knee cap back in place
Sorry, you can not  say you exactly saw any such thing. You not literally see his knee nor know his actual condition.   It doesn't even matter .injuries happen  like in wrestling. It's still staged and Chiefs are still losing
  damn you just get dumber and dumber with every post!

Nothing you said proves its real. Propaganda 

 

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33302
Posted: #35

Give chic a break - Mental issues aside. Right now is a special season for him. He is getting the attention he doesn't getting at the clinic. If SF does win and cover, it will be the first time out of 13 tries (the magic number in his world) he got one right.

He lives for this. He is lonely. 

Condoms - He is the poster child for why they need to be used

Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2015
Posts: 7814
Posted: #36

Quote Originally Posted by wmi799:

Give chic a break - Mental issues aside. Right now is a special season for him. He is getting the attention he doesn't getting at the clinic. If SF does win and cover, it will be the first time out of 13 tries (the magic number in his world) he got one right. He lives for this. He is lonely.  Condoms - He is the poster child for why they need to be used

Not one single counter point to prove me wrong. Not one. 

==============================

If SF does win and cover, it will be the first time out of 13 tries (the magic number in his world) he got one right

==================================

Wrong. Incredibly  wrong. First off I did pick KC, SF in conference,  so that makes 3. I only failed at Washington and Pats.  But what you fail to realize  is,  i now know  the redskins clues i thought I saw, we're kc. Indian  team clues. The Game SF beat them  9-0, was a super bowl clue. 

You seem to enjoy stalking and insulting  me. All I'm doing is saying what I think.  I don't think I've been initiating any name calling.  

  

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2015
Posts: 7814
Posted: #37

Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:

Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:

Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:

Gentlemen.... please pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.  Chicky Man is just here to rowel up everyone with his "Mahomes is Cam" non sense (now he's throwing in Vick and Randle comparisons ).  Although he talks like someone who has never seen Mahomes play (or any other HOF QB), rest assured he is just poking the bear and doing his best at stirring the pot.   "Mahomes is promoted to the black community no doubt" - wtf is this???  This is a new one for Chicky Man and just another example of what Chic's goal is on here, which is to say the most off the wall sh** you can come up with in hopes of getting attention for himself and raising other people's blood pressure.  I can't imagine he actually thinks all this non sense.   The sports as pure entertainment BS is actually the closest thing to reality he ever even talks about.  "Don't believe everything you see and read in the media"  aka don't be a sheep to ESPN and the rest....That is the only message he attempts to convey that is actually anywhere remotely to factual truth.  The rest of it you can flush down the toilet.
===========#///# My view is different  from yours. Get the fuck over it. You choose to feel poked. I'm an adult  with 3 decades of sports viewing  historical  wisdom and experience . Mahomes will be a great promotion for nfl and all. But he'll be nothing like a Marino over time. The league will always make sure a white guy is number one. Mahomes will lose this SB. Go back in your corner  and sit down.
Lmao, I've been polite up to this point and wanted to see how Chicky Man would react to a little pressure.... safe to say I can comfortably put my 3 decades of sports viewing historical wisdom and experience up against yours without any worry....I'll leave you with one more and then go back to not responding to Chicky Man...you are correct, Mahomes will be nothing like Marino over time....he will have at least one ring when all is said and done.  Peace out homey.

  it won't be this weekend. 

 

 

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 5744
Posted: #38
I bet SF, but Mahomes has started 4 playoff games - 11 TD's and 0 INT's in 142 pass attempts.  That deserves a good deal of respect even if KC was a HF in all 4 games.

I rate the passing games virtually dead even; SF's passing DEF edge as nearly as big as KC's passing OFF edge.  SF has a rushing edge in both OFF & DEF.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 10513
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:

Um...yes. 35 years for the most part. History  repeats  itself. That means I know what will happen. He'll be a good popular  player.  But not the next Manning  or Favre or what ever. 

He's just the nfl Dominique  Wilkins.  Lots of highlights but never a Bird or a Magic championship  winner.



Not the next Manning ??? or Farve ???

P Manning had the most one and done's in history of the league.
P Manning is 1-2 SU  & ATS in SB's when at his best or near peak.

Odd that you think Mahomes will lose but not be the next P Manning , losing would make him the next P Manning.

Mahomes has had 2 tries in playoffs with 0 one and done's, yea your right about Mahomes not being the next P Manning there, so far anyway in Mahomes brief career.

Farve was 1-1 SU & ATS in SB's but cost his team dearly time and again with INT's in crucial playoff spots  just like he did with 2009 Vikings in conf title game when we threw acrosas his body to other side of field which is a no-no for QB's and was picked by Saints defense and cost Vikings a possible SB.

Hey, your right there, Mahomes certainly does not seem to be another Farve. So far Mahomes has not cost his team with INT's .
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 7360
Posted: #40

....fair enough, I haven't said anywhere that KC was going to win this Sunday, just addressing the Mahomes inaccuracies around here is all.  

America First
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2018
Posts: 4199
Posted: #41

I used to think you were actually a handicapper but you are making a clown of yourself starting all these threads where you are making up things to argue against.

You're the homer here. I mean we get it, you have a big hard on for the 9ers and you are convinced they will win. You have a gazillion reasons why.

I actually want the Chiefs to win now just because the 9er fans have shown up on this forum in droves and are so obnoxious 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 8593
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by NutinButtLove:

I used to think you were actually a handicapper but you are making a clown of yourself starting all these threads where you are making up things to argue against.

You're the homer here. I mean we get it, you have a big hard on for the 9ers and you are convinced they will win. You have a gazillion reasons why.

I actually want the Chiefs to win now just because the 9er fans have shown up on this forum in droves and are so obnoxious 


I am a handicapped. Focus on post #2 moron. Thanks for stopping by.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 8593
Posted: #43
Handicapper**
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2015
Posts: 7814
Posted: #44

Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:

Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:

Um...yes. 35 years for the most part. History  repeats  itself. That means I know what will happen. He'll be a good popular  player.  But not the next Manning  or Favre or what ever.  He's just the nfl Dominique  Wilkins.  Lots of highlights but never a Bird or a Magic championship  winner.
Not the next Manning ??? or Farve ???P Manning had the most one and done's in history of the league.P Manning is 1-2 SU  & ATS in SB's when at his best or near peak.Odd that you think Mahomes will lose but not be the next P Manning , losing would make him the next P Manning.Mahomes has had 2 tries in playoffs with 0 one and done's, yea your right about Mahomes not being the next P Manning there, so far anyway in Mahomes brief career.Farve was 1-1 SU & ATS in SB's but cost his team dearly time and again with INT's in crucial playoff spots  just like he did with 2009 Vikings in conf title game when we threw acrosas his body to other side of field which is a no-no for QB's and was picked by Saints defense and cost Vikings a possible SB.Hey, your right there, Mahomes certainly does not seem to be another Farve. So far Mahomes has not cost his team with INT's .

You don't understand. Mahomes  won't repeatedly  make playoffs  like Manning and Favre. Won't reach 4 super bowls like Manning. Won't be nationally worshiped like Manning , for as long.

Trying to compare recent stats, has nothing  to do with it.

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 7891
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:

Not one single counter point to prove me wrong. Not one. 

==============================

If SF does win and cover, it will be the first time out of 13 tries (the magic number in his world) he got one right

==================================

Wrong. Incredibly  wrong. First off I did pick KC, SF in conference,  so that makes 3. I only failed at Washington and Pats.  But what you fail to realize  is,  i now know  the redskins clues i thought I saw, we're kc. Indian  team clues. The Game SF beat them  9-0, was a super bowl clue. 

You seem to enjoy stalking and insulting  me. All I'm doing is saying what I think.  I don't think I've been initiating any name calling.  

  

 



LOL...you did NOT pick KC, in fact you said this " I know  ravens, saints, kc, green bay, seattle, won' make it to super bowl."

You also said Browns would make it to AFC Title game, and dozens of other wrong predictions that you present as predetermined facts.  Of course you'll eventually get some right because anyone could when they throw enough random crap at the wall.


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2014
Posts: 5221
Posted: #46

49ers blow out 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2015
Posts: 7814
Posted: #47

Quote Originally Posted by bk1374:

Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:

Not one single counter point to prove me wrong. Not one.  ============================== If SF does win and cover, it will be the first time out of 13 tries (the magic number in his world) he got one right ================================== Wrong. Incredibly  wrong. First off I did pick KC, SF in conference,  so that makes 3. I only failed at Washington and Pats.  But what you fail to realize  is,  i now know  the redskins clues i thought I saw, we're kc. Indian  team clues. The Game SF beat them  9-0, was a super bowl clue.  You seem to enjoy stalking and insulting  me. All I'm doing is saying what I think.  I don't think I've been initiating any name calling.       
LOL...you did NOT pick KC, in fact you said this " I know  ravens, saints, kc, green bay, seattle, won' make it to super bowl."You also said Browns would make it to AFC Title game, and dozens of other wrong predictions that you present as predetermined facts.  Of course you'll eventually get some right because anyone could when they throw enough random crap at the wall.

Are you a literalist with short term memory? 

I simply  said I made the correct picks of the conference championships , before  the conference  championships. 

You just  quoted correct  predictions as well. Thst I made before season started. There was no dozens  of wrong ones. I made the most important macro predictions. 

Youre trying too hard. 

===========

LOL...you did NOT pick KC, in fact you said this " I know  ravens, saints, kc, green bay, seattle, won' make it to super bowl

=============

That's  called 4 right and one wrong.

Yes, you are  going to cherry pick  and all but I've told you exactly  how the SB will go,/end, for 4 months. Who wins during  the season is pointless . 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2015
Posts: 7814
Posted: #48

Quote Originally Posted by Ikid2groove035:

49ers blow out

Minor blow out. 13 points

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 7891
Posted: #49
Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:

LOL...you did NOT pick KC, in fact you said this " I know  ravens, saints, kc, green bay, seattle, won' make it to super bowl."You also said Browns would make it to AFC Title game, and dozens of other wrong predictions that you present as predetermined facts.  Of course you'll eventually get some right because anyone could when they throw enough random crap at the wall.

Are you a literalist with short term memory? 

I simply  said I made the correct picks of the conference championships , before  the conference  championships. 

You just  quoted correct  predictions as well. Thst I made before season started. There was no dozens  of wrong ones. I made the most important macro predictions. 

Youre trying too hard. 

===========

LOL...you did NOT pick KC, in fact you said this " I know  ravens, saints, kc, green bay, seattle, won' make it to super bowl

=============

That's  called 4 right and one wrong.

Yes, you are  going to cherry pick  and all but I've told you exactly  how the SB will go,/end, for 4 months. Who wins during  the season is pointless . 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Not cherry pick SHlT you condescending asshoIe.  All your nonsense is there in writing.  

You said before season Niners would win the SB.  Go try and cash that ticket right now!!!  

You're a troll and a loser, and you fit in PERFECTLY around here.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2015
Posts: 7814
Posted: #50

Quote Originally Posted by bk1374:

Quote Originally Posted by chic-cardinals:

LOL...you did NOT pick KC, in fact you said this " I know  ravens, saints, kc, green bay, seattle, won' make it to super bowl."You also said Browns would make it to AFC Title game, and dozens of other wrong predictions that you present as predetermined facts.  Of course you'll eventually get some right because anyone could when they throw enough random crap at the wall. Are you a literalist with short term memory?  I simply  said I made the correct picks of the conference championships , before  the conference  championships.  You just  quoted correct  predictions as well. Thst I made before season started. There was no dozens  of wrong ones. I made the most important macro predictions.  Youre trying too hard.  =========== LOL...you did NOT pick KC, in fact you said this " I know  ravens, saints, kc, green bay, seattle, won' make it to super bowl ============= That's  called 4 right and one wrong. Yes, you are  going to cherry pick  and all but I've told you exactly  how the SB will go,/end, for 4 months. Who wins during  the season is pointless .               
Not cherry pick SHlT you condescending asshoIe.  All your nonsense is there in writing.  You said before season Niners would win the SB.  Go try and cash that ticket right now!!!  You're a troll and a loser, and you fit in PERFECTLY around here.

Where's the condescending part? Youre the one being condescending.  Im just telling you like it is, bro.

I apparently  don't need to wait a season to pick the SB winner. More proof its staged. 

 

 

All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.