49ers blow out
Chic-Cards, I have read all your posts and agree with your point of view. People are funny, they debate your opinions. Cant wait until after the game, they are gonna wish they listened. I'm curious of your favorite props if any, thanks.
Chic-Cards, I have read all your posts and agree with your point of view. People are funny, they debate your opinions. Cant wait until after the game, they are gonna wish they listened. I'm curious of your favorite props if any, thanks.
First two superbowls, the Steelers were primarily a running team, but Terry did have some clutch completions in both games. The last two superbowls, Bradshaw lit it up and he was the MVP.
Super Bowl 9 Bradshaw was 9 of 14 for 96 yards 1 Td and 0 interceptions with a rating of 108. Pitts' net yards rushing that game was 249 yards.
Super Bowl 10 Bradshaw was 9 of 19 for 209 yards and 2 Tds and 0 interceptions with a QB rating of 122. Pitts' net yards rushing that game was 149 yards. Roger Staubach's stats in that game were 15 of 24 for for 204 with 2 Tds and 3 interceptions and a rating of 77. Bradshaw deserved to be game MVP in that one also IMO as he performed well against that great Dallas D.
Super Bowl 13 Bradshaw was 17 of 30 for 318 yards 4 Tds and 1 interception with a rating of 119. Game MVP
Super Bowl 14 Bradshaw was 14 of 21 for 309 yards 2 Tds and 3 interceptions with a rating of 101. Game MVP (Bud Carson who had created the great Steelers' defenses of the 1970s was the defensive coordinator for the Rams and his Rams' D stifled Pittsburgh til late in the game when Bradshaw harpooned them).
Bradshaw came up big when called upon in big games as he was 4-0 in the super bowls he started and yet his name is never mentioned in super bowl lore and yet he belongs in the discussion. Great players come up big in big games and Terry Bradshaw was a great player.
First two superbowls, the Steelers were primarily a running team, but Terry did have some clutch completions in both games. The last two superbowls, Bradshaw lit it up and he was the MVP.
Super Bowl 9 Bradshaw was 9 of 14 for 96 yards 1 Td and 0 interceptions with a rating of 108. Pitts' net yards rushing that game was 249 yards.
Super Bowl 10 Bradshaw was 9 of 19 for 209 yards and 2 Tds and 0 interceptions with a QB rating of 122. Pitts' net yards rushing that game was 149 yards. Roger Staubach's stats in that game were 15 of 24 for for 204 with 2 Tds and 3 interceptions and a rating of 77. Bradshaw deserved to be game MVP in that one also IMO as he performed well against that great Dallas D.
Super Bowl 13 Bradshaw was 17 of 30 for 318 yards 4 Tds and 1 interception with a rating of 119. Game MVP
Super Bowl 14 Bradshaw was 14 of 21 for 309 yards 2 Tds and 3 interceptions with a rating of 101. Game MVP (Bud Carson who had created the great Steelers' defenses of the 1970s was the defensive coordinator for the Rams and his Rams' D stifled Pittsburgh til late in the game when Bradshaw harpooned them).
Bradshaw came up big when called upon in big games as he was 4-0 in the super bowls he started and yet his name is never mentioned in super bowl lore and yet he belongs in the discussion. Great players come up big in big games and Terry Bradshaw was a great player.
It is confirmed that KC is the public joe bet. Been asking people all week, maybe like 80 total. 80% are on the Chiefs. Why? Offense is high powered and Mahomes is a stud.
Keep disrespecting the Niners, the better overall team and it is not even close.
It is confirmed that KC is the public joe bet. Been asking people all week, maybe like 80 total. 80% are on the Chiefs. Why? Offense is high powered and Mahomes is a stud.
Keep disrespecting the Niners, the better overall team and it is not even close.
There are many who agree with you and guys that I respect as handicappers too like Tony Dungy, Rodney Harrison, Phil Sims (in super bowl picks only) who all favor the 49ers this week. They see it as you see it...
Can the San Fran D wear down this Chiefs D? IMO, KC's D is better than you think they are especially during the second half of the season. It took a while for the new Spagnuolo run D to work. Injuries hampered them also.
When Houston jumped on top of KC a few weeks ago, it wasn't for any lack of play on the D that caused that eruption. A blocked punt ran in for the td and a botched punt return near their own goal line led to 14 of those points. A definite blown coverage for that other early score...
The wins by SF over Minny and GB were impressive but it begs the question...are those two teams in the same category as KC? A lot of the guys who primarily follow the NFC think the Vikes and Packers are superior to the Chiefs which is where the wheels fall off the wagon.
This year there have been games where SF has had feet of clay...against Seattle twice, Atlanta, Baltimore, Pittsburgh (could have beaten them sorry BB)...yeah, they jacked up Baker Mayfield but he had no Oline blocking at all that game...it was hike the ball and a run for his life. In your wildest drunken dreams, do you think that this is the way it will be versus KC?
BOL to all on SF, they are a great team that has had a great run and I am impressed by their play but the Chiefs are no slouches.
There are many who agree with you and guys that I respect as handicappers too like Tony Dungy, Rodney Harrison, Phil Sims (in super bowl picks only) who all favor the 49ers this week. They see it as you see it...
Can the San Fran D wear down this Chiefs D? IMO, KC's D is better than you think they are especially during the second half of the season. It took a while for the new Spagnuolo run D to work. Injuries hampered them also.
When Houston jumped on top of KC a few weeks ago, it wasn't for any lack of play on the D that caused that eruption. A blocked punt ran in for the td and a botched punt return near their own goal line led to 14 of those points. A definite blown coverage for that other early score...
The wins by SF over Minny and GB were impressive but it begs the question...are those two teams in the same category as KC? A lot of the guys who primarily follow the NFC think the Vikes and Packers are superior to the Chiefs which is where the wheels fall off the wagon.
This year there have been games where SF has had feet of clay...against Seattle twice, Atlanta, Baltimore, Pittsburgh (could have beaten them sorry BB)...yeah, they jacked up Baker Mayfield but he had no Oline blocking at all that game...it was hike the ball and a run for his life. In your wildest drunken dreams, do you think that this is the way it will be versus KC?
BOL to all on SF, they are a great team that has had a great run and I am impressed by their play but the Chiefs are no slouches.
It is confirmed that KC is the public joe bet. Been asking people all week, maybe like 80 total. 80% are on the Chiefs. Why? Offense is high powered and Mahomes is a stud.
Keep disrespecting the Niners, the better overall team and it is not even close.
It is confirmed that KC is the public joe bet. Been asking people all week, maybe like 80 total. 80% are on the Chiefs. Why? Offense is high powered and Mahomes is a stud.
Keep disrespecting the Niners, the better overall team and it is not even close.
Last year I bet against Mahomes and with teams that I thought had good defenses and he tore them and me a new one. I get it, #15 is the great destroyer. The fate of KC rides on his shoulders, so why is that any different from what has been the case for two years now? We are just not used to seeing it that often.
He is to the Chiefs what Unitas was to the Colts, what Jim Brown was to the Browns, what Montana was to the 9ers...this QB thing is second nature to him.
This might be an epic game...
Last year I bet against Mahomes and with teams that I thought had good defenses and he tore them and me a new one. I get it, #15 is the great destroyer. The fate of KC rides on his shoulders, so why is that any different from what has been the case for two years now? We are just not used to seeing it that often.
He is to the Chiefs what Unitas was to the Colts, what Jim Brown was to the Browns, what Montana was to the 9ers...this QB thing is second nature to him.
This might be an epic game...
Um.....wait 10 years for that comparison. Right now, he's a successful 3rd year athletic QB.
Nothing more.
Um.....wait 10 years for that comparison. Right now, he's a successful 3rd year athletic QB.
Nothing more.
You have so much to learn, my son.
You have so much to learn, my son.
[/Quote] -------------------- He's nothing more than a potential Vick or Cunningham or Cam Newton right now.[/Quote]
You really are a pathetic loser.
[/Quote] -------------------- He's nothing more than a potential Vick or Cunningham or Cam Newton right now.[/Quote]
You really are a pathetic loser.
Oh please teach us you condescending assh0le!
Honestly I feel bad for you. You have so little confidence in yourself that you have to make up lies and conspiracies to explain why you're so bad at picking any winners. You're weak. Weak mind and weaker soul.
Oh please teach us you condescending assh0le!
Honestly I feel bad for you. You have so little confidence in yourself that you have to make up lies and conspiracies to explain why you're so bad at picking any winners. You're weak. Weak mind and weaker soul.
Couldn't be any more wrong. In addition to his physical skills, his intellect is in another level compared to those buffoons.
Like another poster said , he is set up to be something special in this league
Couldn't be any more wrong. In addition to his physical skills, his intellect is in another level compared to those buffoons.
Like another poster said , he is set up to be something special in this league
Looks like you were the one that ended up being the dumb one to fall for that trap SF..lol
Looks like you were the one that ended up being the dumb one to fall for that trap SF..lol
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.