n The Bye-Week system was implemented by then-commissioner Paul Tagliabue in 1990.
n It was initially proposed to give players ‘rest and rejuvination’ time. The real reason? Expanding the NFL schedule to 17 weeks, thereby increasing T.V. revenues.
n It worked so well, the NFL attempted a ‘2-bye weeks’ per team system in 1993. It failed and they went back to 1-bye per team per year the next season.
n This year, the bye weeks moved from weeks 3-9 to weeks 4-10.
n Since inception, teams coming off of their bye week have won 52% of the time.
n Recently (’05,’06’,and ’07), however, the winning percentage has increased to 58%.
Bye Week Teams: Cincinnati, Dallas, Tampa Bay, Washington
n The Bye-Week system was implemented by then-commissioner Paul Tagliabue in 1990.
n It was initially proposed to give players ‘rest and rejuvination’ time. The real reason? Expanding the NFL schedule to 17 weeks, thereby increasing T.V. revenues.
n It worked so well, the NFL attempted a ‘2-bye weeks’ per team system in 1993. It failed and they went back to 1-bye per team per year the next season.
n This year, the bye weeks moved from weeks 3-9 to weeks 4-10.
n Since inception, teams coming off of their bye week have won 52% of the time.
n Recently (’05,’06’,and ’07), however, the winning percentage has increased to 58%.
Bye Week Teams: Cincinnati, Dallas, Tampa Bay, Washington
From my past notes TY ...NOT UPDATED !
a team is coming off a bye week that was immediately preceded by a Clutch loss" is 39-14 ATS (73.6%) since 1994 ( NONE )
Divisional home dogs with rest are 40-26 ATS ( 60.6 % ) ( NONE )
Divisional home dogs with rest are 24-9 ATS ( 72.7 % ) when they lost SU & ATS prior game ( NONE )
******************************
From my past notes TY ...NOT UPDATED !
a team is coming off a bye week that was immediately preceded by a Clutch loss" is 39-14 ATS (73.6%) since 1994 ( NONE )
Divisional home dogs with rest are 40-26 ATS ( 60.6 % ) ( NONE )
Divisional home dogs with rest are 24-9 ATS ( 72.7 % ) when they lost SU & ATS prior game ( NONE )
******************************
Like the trends. I found this one....
Over is 8-1 for Denver games the last three years following two SU losses......
Like the trends. I found this one....
Over is 8-1 for Denver games the last three years following two SU losses......
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.