Undefeated NFL trend in play this Sunday

Question

My buddy discovered this nugget so I want to share it with all you fine people. The play is cinci +7.5

this system gonna be live for SD! btw there are 3 recent games. 2 years ago sf 14 indy 19, u will remember the game....and this year, falcons(vs GB) and gb this week, both covered.
THIS IS A NUGGET BUDDY! 18-0 over 29 yrs is no joke>>>>unload

GO AGAINST ANY NFL TEAM IF THEY SCORED 30 OR MORE POINTS
IN EACH OF THEIR LAST TWO GAMES AND ALLOWED 12 OR LESS POINTS
IN THOSE SAME TWO GAMES
IF THEY ARE NOW PLAYING A TEAM OUTSIDE OF THEIR DIVISION
This system is 19-0 since 1981

1981
EAGLES (+3.5) 20, @ Bills 14....WIN (9/17)
Bills had won 31-0 and 35-3

1982
PACKERS (+3.5) 13, @ Jets 15....WIN (11/25)
Jets had won 31-7 and 37-0

1985
Bears (-4) 24, @ DOLPHINS 38....WIN (12/2)
Bears had won 44-0 and 36-0

1988
EAGLES (+6) 21, @ Vikings 23....WIN (9/25)
Vikings had won 36-6 and 31-7

1992
Eagles (-2.5) 17, @ CHIEFS 24.....WIN (10/11)
Eagles had won 30-0 and 31-7

OILERS (+5.5) 17, @ Vikings 13.....WIN (11/15)
Vikings had won 38-10 and 35-7

1993
BENGALS (+24) 8, @ 49'ers 21.....WIN (12/5)
49'ers had won 42-7 and 35-10

1996
49'ERS (+6) 20, @ Packers 23.....WIN (10/14)
Packers had won 31-10 and 37-6

Patriots (+4.5) 6, @ COWBOYS 12.....WIN (12/15)
Patriots had won 45-7 and 34-10

1999
Chiefs (+4) 17, @ COLTS 25.....WIN (11/7)
Chiefs had won 35-8 and 34-0

Rams (-8.5) 31, @ EAGLES 38.....WIN (1/2/00)
Rams had won 31-10 and 34-12

2000
JETS (+7.5) 21, @ Buccaneers 17.....WIN (9/24)
Buccaneers had won 41-0 and
31-10

2001
GIANTS (+12) 14, @ Rams 15.....WIN (10/14)
Rams had won 42-10 and 35-0

2005
Seahawks (-7.5) 28, @ TITANS 24....WIN (12/18)
Seahawks had won 42-0 and 41-3

2006
Bears (-13) 24, @ CARDINALS 23....WIN (10/16)
Bears had won 37-6 and 40-7

2007
Cowboys (-11) 28, @ BILLS 23....WIN (10/8)
Cowboys have won 34-10 and 35-7 __________________

GoldenTaint · Answer

My buddy discovered this nugget so I want to share it with all you fine people. The play is cinci +7.5

this system gonna be live for SD! btw there are 3 recent games. 2 years ago sf 14 indy 19, u will remember the game....and this year, falcons(vs GB) and gb this week, both covered.
THIS IS A NUGGET BUDDY! 18-0 over 29 yrs is no joke>>>>unload

GO AGAINST ANY NFL TEAM IF THEY SCORED 30 OR MORE POINTS
IN EACH OF THEIR LAST TWO GAMES AND ALLOWED 12 OR LESS POINTS
IN THOSE SAME TWO GAMES
IF THEY ARE NOW PLAYING A TEAM OUTSIDE OF THEIR DIVISION
This system is 19-0 since 1981

1981
EAGLES (+3.5) 20, @ Bills 14....WIN (9/17)
Bills had won 31-0 and 35-3

1982
PACKERS (+3.5) 13, @ Jets 15....WIN (11/25)
Jets had won 31-7 and 37-0

1985
Bears (-4) 24, @ DOLPHINS 38....WIN (12/2)
Bears had won 44-0 and 36-0

1988
EAGLES (+6) 21, @ Vikings 23....WIN (9/25)
Vikings had won 36-6 and 31-7

1992
Eagles (-2.5) 17, @ CHIEFS 24.....WIN (10/11)
Eagles had won 30-0 and 31-7

OILERS (+5.5) 17, @ Vikings 13.....WIN (11/15)
Vikings had won 38-10 and 35-7

1993
BENGALS (+24) 8, @ 49'ers 21.....WIN (12/5)
49'ers had won 42-7 and 35-10

1996
49'ERS (+6) 20, @ Packers 23.....WIN (10/14)
Packers had won 31-10 and 37-6

Patriots (+4.5) 6, @ COWBOYS 12.....WIN (12/15)
Patriots had won 45-7 and 34-10

1999
Chiefs (+4) 17, @ COLTS 25.....WIN (11/7)
Chiefs had won 35-8 and 34-0

Rams (-8.5) 31, @ EAGLES 38.....WIN (1/2/00)
Rams had won 31-10 and 34-12

2000
JETS (+7.5) 21, @ Buccaneers 17.....WIN (9/24)
Buccaneers had won 41-0 and
31-10

2001
GIANTS (+12) 14, @ Rams 15.....WIN (10/14)
Rams had won 42-10 and 35-0

2005
Seahawks (-7.5) 28, @ TITANS 24....WIN (12/18)
Seahawks had won 42-0 and 41-3

2006
Bears (-13) 24, @ CARDINALS 23....WIN (10/16)
Bears had won 37-6 and 40-7

2007
Cowboys (-11) 28, @ BILLS 23....WIN (10/8)
Cowboys have won 34-10 and 35-7 __________________

SlamminSam212 · Answer

Like IT :) Was also going to bet on the Bengals!!!this just intensifies my Units!!

Dogjimbo · Answer

Does it also say anything about the leading receiver for Cincy being out?

GoldenTaint · Answer

not too sure about injuries but this trend was in play last week with green bay v patriots. i stayed away from it because rodgers was out. i learned my lesson.

LawsonJames · Answer

Wonderful trend thanks for the post

CaliCash · Answer

I was going to go with SD, but that trend is too awesome.  I got burned by GB on SNF last week.  Not going to let that happen again.

CaliCash · Answer

Any concern that SD is coming off extra days rest?

BurningPlanet26 · Answer

I usually hate trend betting and think of it as a crutch for real capping, but sometimes I admit they are intriguing to me. It is very rare but this is one of those times.

I might tail you on this pick for a unit or two just to see where it goes. I remember MrBator bringing the same trend up last week re: GB vs NE and cashing nicely on it.

This trend is compelling to me because of all the factors involved. Teams unable to sustain moment beyond a certain points. Letdowns being inevitable. The public pushing the line up dramatically due to myopia.
-----------
There was another trend that cashed TEN over Indy awhile back but I forgot it...

And the trend of faves over -5.5 on Thursday Night Football hitting at a massive rate (forgot the specific number) was very compelling to me because it showed that dogs with short weeks of preparation are hurt more than big faves.

As long as the trend has a logical explanation and does not involve just the same team's history (IE trends created by other men playing for the same team) I think they can be useful tools. This trend I like. Crap like "The 9ers have beaten the Rams four of their last five meetings" when both teams have changed so much is just worthless.

Anyway, GL, will tail you for fun.

mangosteen · Answer

Not hating on taint, but given the time and resources--I bet you can fins a "system trend" for any game you bet. One that hit over 21 years..probably not

NHLfan98 · Answer

Isn&#x27;t this similar to the trend Mr. Bator came up last week with the NE/GB game?

808-Warrior · Answer

You are also forgetting about SD trend in December being cover monsters &amp; still in playoff hunt needing this game bad.  Cincy in turmoil.  THANKS FOR THE INFO. ANYWAY.

HEFADEME · Answer

Good post, GoldenTaintThat streak will certainly be tested this week.   Bolts have built a reputation as a team that starts slow then rallies to win games late in the season to make the playoffs.   Now, they have benefit of extra rest, and even though they&#x27;re traveling east to play the hapless Bengals, the game is a 4pm ET start, so time zone change shouldn&#x27;t be a factor.I don&#x27;t like the either side, even with the info you provided.    But I might play it as part of a teaser.   And I think I&#x27;d rather have the Chargers -1 than the Bengals &#x2B;14GL

bookiekilla · Answer

Nice post. Thanks for sharing. It happened last week with the New England/ Green Bay game. NE won 45-3 vs. Jets wk 13 and NE won 36-7 wk 14 against CHI. Last week they beat GB 31-27 as a 14 point fave. They should have lost the game SU.

Good luck! I will be on CINCY!! Maybe ML???

dillon24 · Answer

the weather is this game might be a bitch too.. I know it&#x27;ll be cold as hell

ManassaMauler · Answer

interesting

KKemmis · Answer

Interesting. Going to wait and see how this one plays out. Keeping this trend in mind for the future.

dawniewags · Answer

I know i poted this earlier and others bashed my thread go ahead bet the bengals and watch them roll over and die

Chargers did it three weeks ago 4 st games huge wins

final two were riduculous 35 - 14 36 - 14

- 13 pts to raiders at home of course KABOOM lost the game s/u

Gmen 31 -7 21 -3 home vs eagles - 2 1/2 pts KABOOM lost game 31 - 38

Patriots 45 - 3 36 - 7 home - 14 vs GB

Kaboom LOST ATS 31 - 27

packers 45 - 7 31 -3 + 2 @ ATL Kaboom lose 17 - 20

Browns 30 - 17 34 - 17 HOME + 3 vs Jets KABOOM LOST 20 - 26

KC 31 - 13 42 -26 home - 8 vs Broncs KABOOM L ats 10 - 6

Saints 34 - 3 34 - 19 -4 @ Dallas KABOOM L ATS 30 - 27

thats just this season 7 teams hit this system so NOW IT's

26 - 0

CHARGERS trend also 1 -5 ATS after allowing less than 10 PTS vs NON DIV OPP.

DONT Count after vs DIV OPP they blanked KC 31-0 SF was non div 34-7 CINCY is NON DIV

only excption is if opponent is multi injured like daown to 3 rd string and 2nd string rookies on both sides of the ball

PrimeTimeBoys · Answer

When you put this system online for everyone to see, it will fail, whether its this week or very soon, its coming. Ive seen people put up undefeated systems this season & they lost the same week. Nothing wrong with helping your fellow bettor but imo, you keep stuff like this to yourself.

PrimeTimeBoys · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by dawniewags]  I know i poted this earlier and others bashed my thread  go ahead bet the bengals and watch them roll over and die &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Chargers did it three weeks ago 4 st games huge wins &#xD;&#xA;final two were riduculous 35 - 14  36 - 14  &#xD;&#xA;- 13 pts to raiders  at home of course KABOOM lost the game s/u &#xD;&#xA;Gmen  31 -7  21 -3   home vs eagles  - 2 1/2  pts KABOOM lost game   31 - 38  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Patriots  45 - 3  36 - 7 home - 14 vs GB &#xD;&#xA;Kaboom LOST ATS  31 - 27 &#xD;&#xA;packers  45 - 7  31 -3  &#x2B; 2 @ ATL   Kaboom lose  17 - 20  &#xD;&#xA;Browns  30 - 17   34 - 17   HOME  &#x2B; 3  vs Jets KABOOM LOST  20 - 26  &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;KC  31 - 13  42 -26 home - 8 vs Broncs  KABOOM L ats  10 - 6 &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Saints 34 - 3  34 - 19   -4  @ Dallas  KABOOM L ATS  30 - 27 &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;thats just this season  7 teams hit this system  so NOW IT&#x27;s &#xD;&#xA;26 - 0   &#xD;&#xA;CHARGERS trend also   1 -5 ATS  after allowing less than 10 PTS vs NON DIV OPP.   &#xD;&#xA;DONT Count after vs DIV OPP  they blanked KC  31-0   SF was non div  34-7   CINCY is NON DIV  &#xD;&#xA;only excption is if opponent is multi injured like daown to 3 rd string and 2nd string rookies on both sides of the ball &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;   [/Quote]Whenever you post, I gotta get out my secret decoder to figure out wtf you are writing &amp; im still baffled.

Lucky008 · Answer

&#xD;&#xA;I agree... it&#x27;s like the ultimate jinx or that the players would read blogs and say to themselves "oh yeah?  let&#x27;s screw this!"&#xD;&#xA;it&#x27;s amazing!  lol

wil168 · Answer

My book has Cincy &#x2B;9, thanks for the info.

Undefeated NFL trend in play this Sunday

Hot Forum Topics