week 1......colts at texans

Question

talk to me...........i want to lay some serious wood on the texans ML and &#x2B;2

luckythirteen · Answer

talk to me...........i want to lay some serious wood on the texans ML and &#x2B;2

scsiegel89 · Answer

. The only time Manning lost week 1 in last 5 years was 2007 opener against Bears, and that&#x27;s only because he did not play in pre-season and was very rusty.

steve224 · Answer

I like Indy in this one.

luckythirteen · Answer

seriously.....indy is going to have a down year in my opinion.........it has been a few years now that some have been picking the texans to make the playoffs and this is the year it finally happens in my humble opinion.......that stadium is going to be an electric white out on opening day and i expect a houston win

Supply_N_Demand · Answer

I agree lucky, I hope it goes to &#x2B;3...colts are a public team and for good reason, but I like Texans to make a point here

Doxshund · Answer

never bet against Manning

johnboy7541 · Answer

Indi -2.5 just smells like a sucker public bet. But it's nearly impossible to bet against Peyton when there playing the Texans. The Colts are 15-1 in there last 16 against their division rival Texans and until the Texans can show that they can beat the Colts, I'm going to keep betting Indi.

mafioso · Answer

A little did you know.&#xD;&#xA;Since 2000,&#xD;&#xA; week 1 losers of the previous Super Bowl are 0-10 ATS

JCtS · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by mafioso] &#xD;&#xA;A little did you know.&#xD;&#xA;Since 2000,&#xD;&#xA; week 1 losers of the previous Super Bowl are 0-10 ATS &#xD;&#xA;[/Quote]&#xD;&#xA;Then ... IND is EASY Money ! by 3TD ? Nah ... 10 is enough

mafioso · Answer

Indy lost the superbowl last year, this is a week 1 play.

In week one, the previous years superbowl winner is 0-10

Why would you go against a league wide trend?

this isnt some silly team trend, its a league wide trend.

Anyway, good luck with your plays.

dynamicz · Answer

INDY

scsiegel89 · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by mafioso]  Indy lost the superbowl last year, this is a week 1 play.&#xD;&#xA;In week one, the previous years superbowl winner is 0-10&#xD;&#xA;Why would you go against a league wide trend?&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;this isnt some silly team trend, its a league wide trend.&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, good luck with your plays.  [/Quote]Because, they are called TRENDS for a reason. And this trend doesn&#x27;t factor in for Peyton Manning, who has looked razor sharp in limited time during the preseason. But, good luck following trends. You&#x27;ll probably win money every time if you follow the trend...

Profit01 · Answer

I like the over in this game. It may be the better play.

howzuck · Answer

Those type of streaks (SB loser 0-10 in season opener ATS) always end sometime.  Why not now?  I do think Colts will taill off a little this year, but I do remember last year everyone said Texans would win the division and make noise in the playoffs and they laid a big egg at home first week against Jets (zero offensive points).  Maybe this is the year Texans finally break through, but Colts always get off to good start.  I do agree that 2 1/2 is a strange line, bookies are begging you to take Colts, but a lot of people are also on Houston bandwagon this season (again).  I don&#x27;t think they rise and make the playoffs unitl they get a big time coach.  I&#x27;m not a Colts fan at all, but I do think they win this one, and maybe not even on a last minute drive.

User357119 · Answer

Post Deleted

mafioso · Answer

did you also know that the kc chiefs have gone under the total 21 years in a row their 1st home game of the season?

Iv been betting the under 13 years in a row, I may not do it this season but I surely will not bet the over until it goes over.

Following hte logic of its gotta end some time could have cost me 10 or more winners in a row.

Dont beleive it?

Go ahead and research it

21 years in a row

howzuck · Answer

Mafioso, I still think that 0-10 streak will end this year, I will go back and check as far as I can - if what you&#x27;re saying is true, I will make at least a token bet on under Chargers-Chiefs Sunday, despite the apparent minimal value of this "streak".  How many different players &amp; coaches have they had since 1990?  Do you ever believe in coincidence?  Did you know there is a world record of 32 reds in a row (1948 in Monte Carlo).  How long would you have ridden this streak?

mushroomspore · Answer

texans play them tough, will be a close game...do you really wanna be squeezing in the 4th quarter as manning marches up and down the field?  didnt think so, but some people are dumb like that and enjoy the squeezing, the pain, and anguish...

helmstetter21 · Answer

over is the best play here.....see plays teams lighting up the scoreboard

JCtS · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by mafioso] &#xD;&#xA;Indy lost the superbowl last year, this is a week 1 play.&#xD;&#xA;In week one, the previous years superbowl winner is 0-10&#xD;&#xA;Why would you go against a league wide trend?&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;this isnt some silly team trend, its a league wide trend.&#xD;&#xA;Anyway, good luck with your plays.&#xD;&#xA;[/Quote]&#xD;&#xA;Are any of those games with a spread less then a FG ? &#xD;&#xA;Did you know back in the late 80&#x27; to early 90&#x27; ( from 1987 -1996 ) DALLAS COWBOYS losing their  10th game of the sesaon 10 years in a row ! ...and guess what&#x27;d happen in 97&#x27; season !&#xD;&#xA;I&#x27;m not saying IGNORE all the " good" trends ! The key is double checking for a possible legitimate cause of such a trend.&#xD;&#xA;One legitimate trend that has actually made a long term profit over the years is betting AGAINST NFL road teams on MNF -especially Road Favorite ! Why ? Since 1980 HT had cover ATS more then 55% on MNF - as a HD the rate are higher .One causeative explaination might be the fact that being spotlighed ,somehow enhanced the effectes of HFA .This "spotlight" effect might also be even more enhanced by the fact that teams  chosen for MNF are alway the better teams in the league .&#xD;&#xA;I think we ( you ) should NEVER bet on a TREND w/o having logical evidence to back it up .&#xD;&#xA;GL, this season -

SteelCash · Answer

&#xD;&#xA;...unless it&#x27;s a postseason game.

SteelCash · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by mafioso] &#xD;&#xA;did you also know that the kc chiefs have gone under the total 21 years in a row their 1st home game of the season?&#xD;&#xA;Iv been betting the under 13 years in a row, I may not do it this season but I surely will not bet the over until it goes over.&#xD;&#xA;Following hte logic of its gotta end some time could have cost me 10 or more winners in a row.&#xD;&#xA;Dont beleive it?&#xD;&#xA;Go ahead and research it&#xD;&#xA;21 years in a row&#xD;&#xA;[/Quote]&#xD;&#xA;That is amazing!

joelags · Answer

i&#x27;d have to agree with you on this one.

vegasflyer1 · Answer

I bet this one early, May 15th, I took the Colts-3 and wanted to make sure I beat the hook. Well, the line reversed and is at -2.5. The early reasoning of betting the Colts was the fact that Cushing, who was the teams leading tackler for Houston is out for the first 4 games. They drafted one LB (Sharpton out of Miami, and picked up Clark from the Giants. I don't think neither of these fill ins will make up for Cushing.

Now, you have to play the Colts and Manning should be able to pick this defense apart. The Texans have had their chances to win at home against the Colts, but always seem to blow it. I am rebetting the Colts at -2.5 and the over 46.5 also looks good.

The Colts have some value laying less than a FG.

week 1......colts at texans

Hot Forum Topics