My question to you is, do you make your wagers based on last weeks results? What does a bad outing by Brady last week have anything to do with this weekend? And, of course, Minnesota looks legit but are they? It's a different type of game when a defense can load 8 guys in the box to stop the run against a St Louis offense who poses no threat downfield. You and I could've played QB for the Vikings in week 1. Seriously. Do you realize Cassel only attempted 3 passes for more than 10 yds during the entire game? It's easy to be efficient with stats like that. This weekend will be entirely different for Cassel. He will actually have to play QB in week 2. Belicheck is 10-2 against a Norv turner offense so it's safe to say that Belicheck and D coordinator, Patricia, will be well prepared against Minnesota's rushing attack as well as containing their two TE set with Ellison and Rudolph. Belicheck also knows Zimmers defensive tendencies as he faced him last year when Zimmer was Cincy's defensive coordinator. I'm not worried about Brady this weekend, he will do what he always does. Win. The issues with the Patriots offense in week 1 were related to fundamental breakdowns more so than personnel issues and for Patriots backers, this is good news. As everyone knows, the key to either team covering will come down to the Vikings pass rush versus Brady's passing efficiency. Certainly, we will see more checkdowns by Brady and shorter routes...screens, draws, etc.. As effective as Minnesota was last week, I'm not convinced that Minnesota is strong enough in the secondary to not only contain Brady and Co but also Rodgers, Cutler and Stafford within their division. The media wants to hype this team as the new up and coming team but theyre going to have growing pains...which will begin this week.
WELL SAID AMD. I AGREE 100%.
Good to see, Krazz. I'm having a hard time imagining the Bears getting a number any higher than a td but if they do, I'll be hitting the Bears again. I don't care what the New England line settles at, they win comfortably. I think the Raiders line is a joke but, then again, oddsmakers cant set this line any differently. Fitzgerald gets put on his asss the entire game, J.J.is double and triple teamed and the rushing attack sets up a few big plays downfield. The Eagles game might end up with 100 points. It's been awhile since I've liked plays as much as these 4. gl 
GOOD LUCK ..BUT I DON'T LIKE THE RAIDER PICK
Jets were horrible last week and dominated the raiders..what rushing attack? they gained 25 yards on the ground and scored 14 points against a defense that was using their 3rd sting dbacks
I'm really liking the under..good luck with the rest
GOOD LUCK ..BUT I DON'T LIKE THE RAIDER PICK
Jets were horrible last week and dominated the raiders..what rushing attack? they gained 25 yards on the ground and scored 14 points against a defense that was using their 3rd sting dbacks
I'm really liking the under..good luck with the rest
My question to you is, do you make your wagers based on last weeks results? What does a bad outing by Brady last week have anything to do with this weekend? And, of course, Minnesota looks legit but are they? It's a different type of game when a defense can load 8 guys in the box to stop the run against a St Louis offense who poses no threat downfield. You and I could've played QB for the Vikings in week 1. Seriously. Do you realize Cassel only attempted 3 passes for more than 10 yds during the entire game? It's easy to be efficient with stats like that. This weekend will be entirely different for Cassel. He will actually have to play QB in week 2. Belicheck is 10-2 against a Norv turner offense so it's safe to say that Belicheck and D coordinator, Patricia, will be well prepared against Minnesota's rushing attack as well as containing their two TE set with Ellison and Rudolph. Belicheck also knows Zimmers defensive tendencies as he faced him last year when Zimmer was Cincy's defensive coordinator. I'm not worried about Brady this weekend, he will do what he always does. Win. The issues with the Patriots offense in week 1 were related to fundamental breakdowns more so than personnel issues and for Patriots backers, this is good news. As everyone knows, the key to either team covering will come down to the Vikings pass rush versus Brady's passing efficiency. Certainly, we will see more checkdowns by Brady and shorter routes...screens, draws, etc.. As effective as Minnesota was last week, I'm not convinced that Minnesota is strong enough in the secondary to not only contain Brady and Co but also Rodgers, Cutler and Stafford within their division. The media wants to hype this team as the new up and coming team but theyre going to have growing pains...which will begin this week.
Not in the least. You cite Belicheck knowing Zimmer let Zimmer shut down Brady and co.
How is NE going to stop AP? Do you have an answer for that? Their run D was horrible last year and they didn't do anything last week to change my opinion on that.
Betting against Brady coming off a loss and staring down 0-2 is a scary proposition, but NE has no business being favored in this game.
That's great. Doesn't change the fact that Chicago's run defense is still if not the worst in the league at least a bottom 5 unit. Plays right into what SF wants to do on offense. That said, I don't like laying that many points on SF. Game is a no play if you ask me.
Brady picked it up in the 2nd half of the season last year, but he's not the same guy he was even 2-3 years ago. Sometimes decline is rapid and sometimes it creeps up on you.
Not in the least. You cite Belicheck knowing Zimmer let Zimmer shut down Brady and co.
How is NE going to stop AP? Do you have an answer for that? Their run D was horrible last year and they didn't do anything last week to change my opinion on that.
Betting against Brady coming off a loss and staring down 0-2 is a scary proposition, but NE has no business being favored in this game.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
