data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84155/8415519e9bcdf7b86910e668e5acb77812e5c054" alt=""
as ridiculous as this may sound, i agree with you on one aspect. "the squares" lose no matter what because they can not be disciplined in their wagering. they can get 9 "gifts" but theyll lose everything because they had one "gift" line go wrong. the only ppl that make money at this sort of wagering are those whom preach and practice discipline. so making it tougher on the "sharps" should always be the bookmakers priority.
their are no such things as traps. ppl lose because they have no discipline in gambling. ur sucker bet scheme as been shit the last 3 years. u got lucky 4 years ago and u havent come close to anything since then.
and just because the big favs have been covering at an alarming rate doesnt mean they ll stop. thats the same ridiculous reasoning as looking at a roulette table and betting black after its hit red 6 times in a row. oh its due. huh ?
ur betting on a team without now its two best defensive players and mr. check down himself, trent edwards whom is the real life version of footsteps Falco from the film the replacements!
as ridiculous as this may sound, i agree with you on one aspect. "the squares" lose no matter what because they can not be disciplined in their wagering. they can get 9 "gifts" but theyll lose everything because they had one "gift" line go wrong. the only ppl that make money at this sort of wagering are those whom preach and practice discipline. so making it tougher on the "sharps" should always be the bookmakers priority.
their are no such things as traps. ppl lose because they have no discipline in gambling. ur sucker bet scheme as been shit the last 3 years. u got lucky 4 years ago and u havent come close to anything since then.
and just because the big favs have been covering at an alarming rate doesnt mean they ll stop. thats the same ridiculous reasoning as looking at a roulette table and betting black after its hit red 6 times in a row. oh its due. huh ?
ur betting on a team without now its two best defensive players and mr. check down himself, trent edwards whom is the real life version of footsteps Falco from the film the replacements!
if thats your reasoning then y dont u go with the under? what has the bills done for u to take them...cause their due?...
the bills cant score when its 80 and sunny, jets will pound the ground and cover the line easily!! thats the play
if thats your reasoning then y dont u go with the under? what has the bills done for u to take them...cause their due?...
the bills cant score when its 80 and sunny, jets will pound the ground and cover the line easily!! thats the play
mooonie1 - " jets will pound the ground and cover the line easily!!"
you 2 are fuuny. comments like this is the exact reason for the sucker bet.
good luck demapples!
mooonie1 - " jets will pound the ground and cover the line easily!!"
you 2 are fuuny. comments like this is the exact reason for the sucker bet.
good luck demapples!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.