Well done Seahawks....just unreal choke job

Quote Originally Posted by Theone324:

DISCOUNT DOUBLE CHECK BI TCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Think the Giants can get 7 wins next year??

MrWhat--I agree, just a brutal way to lose.  The good thing is that GB is a young team and will only get better with a few new pieces.  They are going to be factors for the next 5 years atleast in the NFC

Highscore--tell me about it.  I would rather the game been like the Indy/NE game where it was over in the 3rd qtr rather than dominating for 58 mins and blow it

Im still torn on this first call....obviously you want 7 there but you cant come away with 0 either...if you get 0 there and Seattle scores the game could be over right then...obviously after kicking the first time you have to kick the 2nd time as well

I think GB was confident it would be alow scoring game, so points mattered...

I am still in shock they lost this game...I mean to have 6 scoring drives vs 3 and lose...just mind-boggling

All we can do now is a whole lot of "what-ifs"...

Obviously, worst case, GB wouldn't have made it, forced a 3-out and got the ball back with great field position...

Just saying though, IF Seattle did stop them, and somehow went down 99yds for a TD....that would have been crushing and possibly game over very quickly...

Getting on the board first was important...even if it was just a field goal...

I agree, to start the game I would have loved for them to go for it, but I don't blame that as to why they lost the game...

For me, its still the prevent defense....Seattle had 1 scoring drive all game....why play a shell the last 4 mins....just awful job by Capers to end the game

Quote Originally Posted by QMICH:



SEATTLE HAD MORE RUSHING YARDS, MORE PASSING YARDS, MORE FIRST DOWNS & WAS TURNING THE BALL OVER LIKE A GRILL CHEF TURNING BURGERS

DOMINATED OR DONATED?

RUSSELL WILSON GIVETH & RUSSELL WILSON TAKETH AWAY

Well if you want to include the 87 yds in OT when GB doesnt get the ball...then your statement is true...

Seattle didnt have a 1st down until the 2nd qtr...

Seattle didnt have a scoring drive until 4:44 left in the 3rd qtr, when GB had 4 scoring drives by that point

Seattle had 3 scoring drives, GB had 6

Quote Originally Posted by QMICH:



SEATTLE DID'NT HAVE A 1ST DOWN IN THE 1ST QUARTER BECAUSE THEY WERE TOO BUSY GIFTING GBAY THE BALL ON THIER SIDE OF THE FIELD.  4 OF THE PACKERS "SCORING DRIVES" WERE A DIRECT RESULT OF SEATTLE TOs/ERRORS ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE 50 YARDLINE.  PRETTY SURE GBAY ONLY HAD 2 DRIVES(FGs WOW) START ON THEIR SIDE OF THE FIELD!  UNFORTUNATELY THE PACK OFFENSE WAS JUST NOT GOOD ENOUGH OR SEATTLE'S D WAS JUST TOO FUKIN TOUGH FOR THEM TO PUNCH IT INTO THE END ZONE.  WITH THE STARTING FIELD POSITION BEING SO LOPSIDED IN THEIR FAVOR, IF YOU CAN'T WIN THAT GAME THEN YOU CAN'T WIN MUCH!  THE BETTER TEAM WON & THE EVIDENTLY MENTALLY IMPAIRED TEAM GOES HOME

I understand your pain being a Lions fan...its ok

So, forcing turnovers and getting good field position because the D is playing good and Seattle cant do anything is not "dominating"??

Gb had 2 short drives because of TO...the 1st fg and 2nd fg...in reality, they marched right down the field to open the game anyways and threw a INT in the endzone because the refs missed the offsides...so they marched 60yds to open the game before turning it over and then getting it right back

Before the 69yd drive with 4 mins left by Seattle to make the game 19-14...they had a WHOOPING 190yds TOTAL.....yes 190yds in 56 mins

Right....I still go over all the 10+ mistakes in my head everyday right now and am in shock they aren't playing next week