All Forums | NFL Betting

WHY DID HE CHOOSE TAILS

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2380
Posts: 53
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 275
Posted: #1
Honestly, its heads like 90% of the time.. Its that guys fault they lost.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 21426
Posted: #2
Your an idiot
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 3965
Posted: #3
90%
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 2135
Posted: #4
actually alot of the NFL players believe in
"tails never fails".
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 275
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by CalBear:

Your an idiot


Thanks bro!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 8145
Posted: #6
lol funniest thread of the night
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 963
Posted: #7
50% of the time you'd be right, but 50% of the time your wrong.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 859
Posted: #8
maybe he had some head last night and he wanted some tails now?
 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 19509
Posted: #9
I always pick tails because Im an ass man!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1998
Posted: #10
Well honestly...what kind of statement is that?  Because he didn't pick heads?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 3875
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by CalBear:

Your an idiot

Ironically 'you're' the idiot. Then again, I am assuming you can read and write at a 3rd grade level.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 119
Posted: #12
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 629
Posted: #13
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 19509
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by danny-V2:

Honestly, its heads like 90% of the time.. Its that guys fault they lost.

90% huh?  Please come to Las Vegas, the casinos need you!

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 578
Posted: #15
that was brees
i cringed when i heard him call it!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 23333
Posted: #16
This game was clearly fixed. There was a piece of gum stuck to the tails side of the coin, and the added weight caused the coin to land tails down.
 
Damn officials!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1086
Posted: #17
this was obviously a fix
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 10350
Posted: #18
Haha now that is funny
 
If you want to look at the conspiracy theory more..The ref was looking at him like are you sure? 
 Maybe it was a double headed coin.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60035
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by CalBear:

Your an idiot

This is my favorite insult at covers.

So ironic and funny rolled in to one.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 27304
Posted: #20
That SOB
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 6273
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by Leroy-Bombers:

50% of the time you'd be right, but 50% of the time your wrong.
man thats funny shit.  last time i checked it was 50 50
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 21426
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by AirRainman:


Ironically 'you're' the idiot. Then again, I am assuming you can read and write at a 3rd grade level.

Your just mad because I bashed your sorry ass after you stated a certain play would be your last if you lost....and it lost but your still postingAirRainman

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 2058
Posted: #23
Actually if you look back at the super bowl each year and the coin flip...heads hits at a high percentage...I found out the exact weight of the coin last year and I cant remember which one but one side has more shit on it so its heavier...


My favorite bet of the year!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 2058
Posted: #24
and I can remember some guy on here talking about the percentages then
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 23
Posted: #25
Just a quick question:
 
I bet an A&R tonight $50 for Chicago -3 and under 45.5
 
So I thought:
50 for Chicago -3 would push no play
and i would lose 55 for the Under45.5
 
My account with my book says
 
-3 Chicago lose (110) but it says push/no action
U45.5 Lose (55)
 
Is this true since I lost the 2nd bet? I dont know how i could lose (165) on a 50 A&R?
 
Is this just a technology glitch?
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.