All Forums | NFL Betting

Why take a seat when at the 2 yard line?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4356
Posts: 79
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 1290
Posted: #26
Don't forget.  We are betting on entertainment show.   We have to solve the answer before the game start.  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2018
Posts: 4049
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by NutinButtLove:

I know. What's with the idiots who dont understand math or how clocks work wondering why theyre kneeling and kicking when time expires.


Take a seat “phillybrown”.... Remeber when your other account was banned because you went TOUT and completely crapped the bed.. I remember. Also nice call on your HUGE TB WAGER, how did that work out for you? 
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 502
Posted: #28

This is why I tease alot if these primetime games...totally rigged

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2018
Posts: 4108
Posted: #29

Quote Originally Posted by notaprojust4fun:

even if lions had the ball back the pack d was stopping them in the 2nd half. that fg was almost blocked. why chance it when u have the td. oh wait...the under hit and no free lions ml also lol.

Thats pure idiocy tin foil hat nonsense. If it was better for the Pack to score a TD then why were the Lions about to let them do it? And if it was fixed why would they be trying to let them score?

If they wanted the Under to hit why did they keep extending Packers drives twice with bad calls?

Hate all these rigged game idiots just stop betting then if it's rigged, why do you keep betting? Cant accept that you make bad picks, can't accept that there will be bad calls then dont gamble.

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2017
Posts: 2629
Posted: #30
Becuz sports are scripted... GB not only didnt cover but the under also was hit... Yet people on here still deny sports being fixed despite blatant stuff like this, hahahah wake up sheep!!  Sports are nothing but scripted entertainment.. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2017
Posts: 423
Posted: #31

I had GB -3.5 and of course I’m irritated he didn’t just run it in. But, that is the correct football play. You see how Detroit didn’t bother to tackle him or rush. They wanted him to score so they could get the ball back.

it’s a bad beat for GB backers, but GB not covering had more to do with their inability to score TD’s instead of field goals and missed red zone opportunities.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2002
Posts: 66013
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by bmiller1632:

Lions did not play defense on that play they were letting him score to preserve some time .. GB did the right thing

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2018
Posts: 4108
Posted: #33

Quote Originally Posted by Cupcaking:

I had GB -3.5 and of course I’m irritated he didn’t just run it in. But, that is the correct football play. You see how Detroit didn’t bother to tackle him or rush. They wanted him to score so they could get the ball back. it’s a bad beat for GB backers, but GB not covering had more to do with their inability to score TD’s instead of field goals and missed red zone opportunities.

It's not a bad beat they should have lost the game straight up the refs handed the game to GB with 2 blatant bad calls and a non call PI. 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #34

Being a GB fan, I would rather have had the Td and forced the Lions to get a TD with 50 seconds and no timeouts than risk kicking a fg with no time....too much can go wrong....

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2018
Posts: 2888
Posted: #35

Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

Being a GB fan, I would rather have had the Td and forced the Lions to get a TD with 50 seconds and no timeouts than risk kicking a fg with no time....too much can go wrong....

my exact thoughts. I hate FG. No way stafford scores in 40 seconds either with no timeouts

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2019
Posts: 7099
Posted: #36
Post Deleted
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2019
Posts: 7099
Posted: #37
Post Deleted
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2002
Posts: 11128
Posted: #38

He wanted to imitate Todd Gurley from last year... 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 336
Posted: #39

If it was scripted, they would've gotten the calls right!!!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2019
Posts: 244
Posted: #40

Detroit  should  have picked Williams up and dragged him into the endzone... that would have been a nice look for the nfl...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 2432
Posted: #41

This is correct clock management strategy. 2 objectives on the drives at the end the game when behind score to take the lead and leave no time on the for your opponent to come back and score. Clock management run to perfection by green bay.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2018
Posts: 356
Posted: #42

Quote Originally Posted by Ksutribe:

Detroit  should  have picked Williams up and dragged him into the endzone... that would have been a nice look for the nfl...

an_happybounceHILARIOUS!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2016
Posts: 250
Posted: #43

Because it was a smart football move.

Now for the refs on the other hand blowing more calls than you can count on one hand...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1088
Posted: #44
How can people say it was the right call to exchange a 100% 5 point lead with that free TD lions where giving the. To try a "low risk" FG attemp.... didnt Tanpa Bay try that in the Giants game.... ask Bruce Ariens how that turned out for him....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 2280
Posted: #45
Like bruh said, they should have carried him into the end zone lol. This is why a 40 second play clock is stupid in the nfl. Players are no less entertainers than actors. They get paid to entertain, not take knees for a fraction of the game. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2016
Posts: 250
Posted: #46

Quote Originally Posted by obravo21:

How can people say it was the right call to exchange a 100% 5 point lead with that free TD lions where giving the. To try a "low risk" FG attemp.... didnt Tanpa Bay try that in the Giants game.... ask Bruce Ariens how that turned out for him....


Because a field goal from the 2 yard line is the equivalent of the old extra point that was connecting at 99%+ so much so that the league pushed it back. Leaving the opponent with no time on the clock to score right back is by far a safer move.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1088
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by Jason497:



Because a field goal from the 2 yard line is the equivalent of the old extra point that was connecting at 99%+ so much so that the league pushed it back. Leaving the opponent with no time on the clock to score right back is by far a safer move.


Again stupid to say that a field goal attemp even from the 1 inch yd line is better than a TD that was given to you for free... smh
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1088
Posted: #48
But anyway that was by far the least of the lions problems.... There is no way to say that the refs dictated the result premeditated or not...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1088
Posted: #49
Ment there is no way to say refs didnt dictated the result of the game
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2014
Posts: 8690
Posted: #50

The lions were letting him walk in because they knew it was their only chance. That kind of sht is more WWE than anything. 

,
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.