not bad,Dallas really sucks by the way,lol
Knew that Atl.under was going to hit because its the one I missed,but hit the As F-5 against Minn.to get my 4-2,plus a few bucks on a RR that hit 3 of 4,all in all a ++ morning.
You going to take your nap again Lipp and pass on the sec round,
not bad,Dallas really sucks by the way,lol
Knew that Atl.under was going to hit because its the one I missed,but hit the As F-5 against Minn.to get my 4-2,plus a few bucks on a RR that hit 3 of 4,all in all a ++ morning.
You going to take your nap again Lipp and pass on the sec round,
not bad,Dallas really sucks by the way,lol
Knew that Atl.under was going to hit because its the one I missed,but hit the As F-5 against Minn.to get my 4-2,plus a few bucks on a RR that hit 3 of 4,all in all a ++ morning.
You going to take your nap again Lipp and pass on the sec round,
Where it's 5 games I will probably stick around.
not bad,Dallas really sucks by the way,lol
Knew that Atl.under was going to hit because its the one I missed,but hit the As F-5 against Minn.to get my 4-2,plus a few bucks on a RR that hit 3 of 4,all in all a ++ morning.
You going to take your nap again Lipp and pass on the sec round,
Where it's 5 games I will probably stick around.
I loved reading the program from the harness races when I was a kid, especially after my dad did his handicapping. He took notes that probably got me hooked on this game of trying to predict the future.
Anyways, once every few weeks I would find a race where he would circle at the top of it - "NO ONE CAN WIN".
That's how I feel about Oak-STL.
I loved reading the program from the harness races when I was a kid, especially after my dad did his handicapping. He took notes that probably got me hooked on this game of trying to predict the future.
Anyways, once every few weeks I would find a race where he would circle at the top of it - "NO ONE CAN WIN".
That's how I feel about Oak-STL.
No chance, I took under 43.
All considered, Wash defense is looking good. Maybe, just maybe they (skins) get another score and then work the clock and you squeak out.
No chance, I took under 43.
All considered, Wash defense is looking good. Maybe, just maybe they (skins) get another score and then work the clock and you squeak out.
I think Houston will come out firing almost every play. It should be wide open
I think Houston will come out firing almost every play. It should be wide open
All considered, Wash defense is looking good. Maybe, just maybe they (skins) get another score and then work the clock and you squeak out.
Took under 21.5 +102
All considered, Wash defense is looking good. Maybe, just maybe they (skins) get another score and then work the clock and you squeak out.
Took under 21.5 +102
Looking at it now
Looking at it now
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.