probably "useless BS" stat from so far these playoffs BUT the team that
failed to win a potential "close out" game to win a series is 1-4 so far.
1st round the Sharks lose game 4 vs Kings with a 3-0 series lead and then get swept the next four. Avalanche lose game 6 vs Wild with a 3-2 series lead and lose game 7.
2nd round the Penguins lose game 5 vs the Rangers with a 3-1 series lead and then lose the next two games. the Bruins lose game 6 vs the Habs with a 3-2 series lead and then lose game 7
ONLY team to NOT lose after blowing their potential "close out" game is the Rangers in the 1st round vs Flyers. lost game 6 @ Philly BUT recovered to win game 7 @ MSG
question IS will the Ducks
be in the FAIL group joining the Avalanche, Penguins and Bruins with
game 7 losses @ home OR mirror the Rangers winning @ home after a game 6
road loss?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
probably "useless BS" stat from so far these playoffs BUT the team that
failed to win a potential "close out" game to win a series is 1-4 so far.
1st round the Sharks lose game 4 vs Kings with a 3-0 series lead and then get swept the next four. Avalanche lose game 6 vs Wild with a 3-2 series lead and lose game 7.
2nd round the Penguins lose game 5 vs the Rangers with a 3-1 series lead and then lose the next two games. the Bruins lose game 6 vs the Habs with a 3-2 series lead and then lose game 7
ONLY team to NOT lose after blowing their potential "close out" game is the Rangers in the 1st round vs Flyers. lost game 6 @ Philly BUT recovered to win game 7 @ MSG
question IS will the Ducks
be in the FAIL group joining the Avalanche, Penguins and Bruins with
game 7 losses @ home OR mirror the Rangers winning @ home after a game 6
road loss?
In short windows, stats like this worry me. I see Anaheim getting that record a little closer to .500.
Kind of like all morning games on NFL Sunday going under/or faves covering. The dogs are going to bark and the overs are going to come back. Typically in the afternoon games.
I hope I am wrong. It's a no play for me because I can't bet against my team in a big game like this.
0
In short windows, stats like this worry me. I see Anaheim getting that record a little closer to .500.
Kind of like all morning games on NFL Sunday going under/or faves covering. The dogs are going to bark and the overs are going to come back. Typically in the afternoon games.
I hope I am wrong. It's a no play for me because I can't bet against my team in a big game like this.
Teams look even...comes down to goaltending... don't think you need to over analyze this one I will take Quick over Hiller/Anderson/Gibson
LA ML for me!
https://twitter.com/icemancometh No changes in goal. Gibson for Ducks, Quick for Kings.
Johnny Quick has the NHL experience and has won a Stanley Cup. "Johnny Goalie" has also been a winner BUT not at the NHL level. NO action for me BUT forced to pick would play the Kings.
besides, IF the Kings win will just aggrevate me off even more for NOT chancing them when they were 75-1 on a Cup future down 0-3 to the Sharks round one
0
Quote Originally Posted by Culls17:
Teams look even...comes down to goaltending... don't think you need to over analyze this one I will take Quick over Hiller/Anderson/Gibson
LA ML for me!
https://twitter.com/icemancometh No changes in goal. Gibson for Ducks, Quick for Kings.
Johnny Quick has the NHL experience and has won a Stanley Cup. "Johnny Goalie" has also been a winner BUT not at the NHL level. NO action for me BUT forced to pick would play the Kings.
besides, IF the Kings win will just aggrevate me off even more for NOT chancing them when they were 75-1 on a Cup future down 0-3 to the Sharks round one
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.