RMG, of course.. the programs get stronger as the seasons progress.. more games (better numbers)... the programs started in 2009 as Moneyline Underdog programs but evolved into what we use today. This isnt magic or hocus pocus, just sound programming (zero handicapping), that should hit 57.14% against a (-110) line or better.. i have much data that proves this.. The zero handicapping at times is a deterrent but more times than not, its a plus.. I had to remove myself from the equation..
MITM (FS)
0
RMG, of course.. the programs get stronger as the seasons progress.. more games (better numbers)... the programs started in 2009 as Moneyline Underdog programs but evolved into what we use today. This isnt magic or hocus pocus, just sound programming (zero handicapping), that should hit 57.14% against a (-110) line or better.. i have much data that proves this.. The zero handicapping at times is a deterrent but more times than not, its a plus.. I had to remove myself from the equation..
So much haterade drinkin in these forums. Up thousands just blindly tailing these dudes' NHL picks. I don't know anything about hockey. I do like making money though.
Thanks MITM/Falcon.
0
So much haterade drinkin in these forums. Up thousands just blindly tailing these dudes' NHL picks. I don't know anything about hockey. I do like making money though.
He didnt bother me.. I stated this thread was from 2015 (calendar year), the entire season has been profitable.. Thats whats its all about anyway, turning a profit..
When do u know that u have something, a program (model) that is going to continually beat the books..
My program gives so much information, some of the stuff, i dont know what to do with..
1. Should i be playing every play that i have an edge in? Example all plays over 50% with a positive Value, then play the win projections over 60% for 2 units, keeping the one's in the 50-59% to one unit..
2. Also what about playing the -1 lines on all projections over 70%..
As u can see from my numbers above, we would be playing NYR small tonight, playing Mont larger and passing on Chicago..
Take Chicago, my numbers show a projected win rate of 65% tonight but the line is too high at over (-200)... it would have been a play with a lower line but do u really want to lay say (-180)? or should we be playing plays like this on the (-1) line.. Im totally against the puckline or regulation wagers, as they against the makeup of the program.. if the program wins, i want to win..
U guys have a good night, ill post the plays here or someone else can get them off twitter (FalconWins) and put them here.. Im just really busy right now and cant run to the internet sites each morning and put stuff up..
Good Luck tonight
MITM (FS)
0
He didnt bother me.. I stated this thread was from 2015 (calendar year), the entire season has been profitable.. Thats whats its all about anyway, turning a profit..
When do u know that u have something, a program (model) that is going to continually beat the books..
My program gives so much information, some of the stuff, i dont know what to do with..
1. Should i be playing every play that i have an edge in? Example all plays over 50% with a positive Value, then play the win projections over 60% for 2 units, keeping the one's in the 50-59% to one unit..
2. Also what about playing the -1 lines on all projections over 70%..
As u can see from my numbers above, we would be playing NYR small tonight, playing Mont larger and passing on Chicago..
Take Chicago, my numbers show a projected win rate of 65% tonight but the line is too high at over (-200)... it would have been a play with a lower line but do u really want to lay say (-180)? or should we be playing plays like this on the (-1) line.. Im totally against the puckline or regulation wagers, as they against the makeup of the program.. if the program wins, i want to win..
U guys have a good night, ill post the plays here or someone else can get them off twitter (FalconWins) and put them here.. Im just really busy right now and cant run to the internet sites each morning and put stuff up..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.