LW @ HH:
Teams such as the Tampa Bay Lightning which post a win/site order of LW
@ HH have a 0-6 Game 3 record in the 2015 NHL playoffs ... but an
active six-series winning streak in best-of-7 NHL Finals series (with
the last in 2004, by the Tampa Bay Lightning).
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
LW @ HH:
Teams such as the Tampa Bay Lightning which post a win/site order of LW
@ HH have a 0-6 Game 3 record in the 2015 NHL playoffs ... but an
active six-series winning streak in best-of-7 NHL Finals series (with
the last in 2004, by the Tampa Bay Lightning).
Well you have to ask yourself, did TB lose the first game and then lose the second game in those series? I don't think so. It's all about the order of results bud. It's not just pertaining to game 3s, you have to take the above site order into account. Hope that helps
0
Well you have to ask yourself, did TB lose the first game and then lose the second game in those series? I don't think so. It's all about the order of results bud. It's not just pertaining to game 3s, you have to take the above site order into account. Hope that helps
they have beaten detroit, rangers, and mtl so how do they have 6 game 3 loses in 2015
Reading comprehension.....Read slower man. it does not say Tampa Bay, it says teams such as Tampa, meaning all teams in these playoffs that are in the exact situation Tampa is in tonight...Get it??
An example if this exact situation in these playoffs would be Chicago vs Nashville...Hawks won game one in Nashville then lost game two in Nashville then went home to win game three in Chicago.
The lion and the tiger may be more powerful, but the wolf doesn't perform in the circus.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Trevi3610:
they have beaten detroit, rangers, and mtl so how do they have 6 game 3 loses in 2015
Reading comprehension.....Read slower man. it does not say Tampa Bay, it says teams such as Tampa, meaning all teams in these playoffs that are in the exact situation Tampa is in tonight...Get it??
An example if this exact situation in these playoffs would be Chicago vs Nashville...Hawks won game one in Nashville then lost game two in Nashville then went home to win game three in Chicago.
"factoid" from https://twitter.com/PR_NHL Since 1939, winner of Game 3 after a split the of opening two contests has captured the Stanley Cup 21 of 26 times (80.8%)
0
"factoid" from https://twitter.com/PR_NHL Since 1939, winner of Game 3 after a split the of opening two contests has captured the Stanley Cup 21 of 26 times (80.8%)
"factoid" from https://twitter.com/PR_NHL Since 1939, winner of Game 3 after a split the of opening two contests has captured the Stanley Cup 21 of 26 times (80.8%)
THAT is one hell of a trend!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by LeRinkRat:
"factoid" from https://twitter.com/PR_NHL Since 1939, winner of Game 3 after a split the of opening two contests has captured the Stanley Cup 21 of 26 times (80.8%)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.