first the missed offsides to decide the game, then a guy who shouldnt have been playing gets the game winning goal... this series has no integrity
Clearly you haven't watched the game 1 goal, or at least YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND hockey rules, he was onsides (yes it was close) but from the ice angle along the blue-line it was onsides The tv crew never came back to the angle (advantage of using DVR) but his toe was not in front of the line when the puck crossed.
The world cup is probably a fraud to since the refs missed a couple of calls, and fucking NFL refs missed a pass-interference and holding call. I saw Lebron take 4 steps in the conf finals and not get called. I also saw Timmy get a strike when the ball was inches outside....GODDAMN all sports must be a FRAUD!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by IHIOUSE:
first the missed offsides to decide the game, then a guy who shouldnt have been playing gets the game winning goal... this series has no integrity
Clearly you haven't watched the game 1 goal, or at least YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND hockey rules, he was onsides (yes it was close) but from the ice angle along the blue-line it was onsides The tv crew never came back to the angle (advantage of using DVR) but his toe was not in front of the line when the puck crossed.
The world cup is probably a fraud to since the refs missed a couple of calls, and fucking NFL refs missed a pass-interference and holding call. I saw Lebron take 4 steps in the conf finals and not get called. I also saw Timmy get a strike when the ball was inches outside....GODDAMN all sports must be a FRAUD!!!
first the missed offsides to decide the game, then a guy who shouldnt have been playing gets the game winning goal... this series has no integrity
I always think u re the one with some knowledge in hockey.......but .......I'm serious. They reply so many times and showed it wasn't offside. And burrows should never gets suspended for his stupid bite thing, there were way more serious hit and stuff in the past in the final. Just let u know , I bet on Boston as well
stop this crying thing, plzzzzz
0
Quote Originally Posted by IHIOUSE:
first the missed offsides to decide the game, then a guy who shouldnt have been playing gets the game winning goal... this series has no integrity
I always think u re the one with some knowledge in hockey.......but .......I'm serious. They reply so many times and showed it wasn't offside. And burrows should never gets suspended for his stupid bite thing, there were way more serious hit and stuff in the past in the final. Just let u know , I bet on Boston as well
To allow this guy to play it serves them right that he gets 2 goals and the OT winner. Disgraceful. (and I didnt have the Bruins) just an observation on why people consider this league a joke
if you thought that him biting the finger of a player in the SCF warrants a suspension then you are dumb. in the regular season if this happened the max suspension would of been 1 game, does 1 regular season game = 1 SCF games, no. 1 SCF game = 4-5 regular season games or 3 at least IMO. so stop crying about him not being suspended.
0
Quote Originally Posted by NJDevils:
To allow this guy to play it serves them right that he gets 2 goals and the OT winner. Disgraceful. (and I didnt have the Bruins) just an observation on why people consider this league a joke
if you thought that him biting the finger of a player in the SCF warrants a suspension then you are dumb. in the regular season if this happened the max suspension would of been 1 game, does 1 regular season game = 1 SCF games, no. 1 SCF game = 4-5 regular season games or 3 at least IMO. so stop crying about him not being suspended.
i guess all those guys on tv working the game must not know anything either, they all agree it should have been a suspension im not coming on here to cry just stating my opinion, replying to somebody elses opinion... these are forums for discussion no ??
0
i guess all those guys on tv working the game must not know anything either, they all agree it should have been a suspension im not coming on here to cry just stating my opinion, replying to somebody elses opinion... these are forums for discussion no ??
ive seen soo many people in the forums over the last 2-3 weeks say "you know nothing about hockey " just because of different opinions, no wonder all the regulars dissapear from here come playoff time
0
ive seen soo many people in the forums over the last 2-3 weeks say "you know nothing about hockey " just because of different opinions, no wonder all the regulars dissapear from here come playoff time
ive seen soo many people in the forums over the last 2-3 weeks say "you know nothing about hockey " just because of different opinions, no wonder all the regulars dissapear from here come playoff time
U re the well respect one in here( at least to me ), don't get me wrong. But when u bring out the offside ( blown call ) & suspension thing.........it sure looks like u crying for yr lost bet or something.
I don't know what channel u re watching, but in toronto. Sportsnet, tsn and a few radio station already said he won't get a suspension after gm 1. There were way more serious thing happened in the final before, this biting thing was a joke and he was totally stupid. But this will/should never go to the suspension.
0
Quote Originally Posted by IHIOUSE:
ive seen soo many people in the forums over the last 2-3 weeks say "you know nothing about hockey " just because of different opinions, no wonder all the regulars dissapear from here come playoff time
U re the well respect one in here( at least to me ), don't get me wrong. But when u bring out the offside ( blown call ) & suspension thing.........it sure looks like u crying for yr lost bet or something.
I don't know what channel u re watching, but in toronto. Sportsnet, tsn and a few radio station already said he won't get a suspension after gm 1. There were way more serious thing happened in the final before, this biting thing was a joke and he was totally stupid. But this will/should never go to the suspension.
the offside was close, i was more busting burleys balls on that one, but should have been a suspension for biting, every analyst on nbc/versus agreed on that. you say its ok to bite people with no suspension, thats your opinion
0
the offside was close, i was more busting burleys balls on that one, but should have been a suspension for biting, every analyst on nbc/versus agreed on that. you say its ok to bite people with no suspension, thats your opinion
the offside was close, i was more busting burleys balls on that one, but should have been a suspension for biting, every analyst on nbc/versus agreed on that. you say its ok to bite people with no suspension, thats your opinion
thx for yr feed back as well
The sportscentre in toronto show the reply so many times to prove it wasn't a blown call and also the analyst in here like those ex-nhl players & ex-nhl gm discuss the bite after gm 1 and they all think it shouldn't be a suspension.
U know ppl in toronto re crazy about hockey and we actually don't cheer for the canucks even they re in canada. I bet on Boston gm 1 & gm 2 and want them to win too. But we play fair & square, boston lost not bcos of those reasons. They lost to a better team.
0
Quote Originally Posted by IHIOUSE:
the offside was close, i was more busting burleys balls on that one, but should have been a suspension for biting, every analyst on nbc/versus agreed on that. you say its ok to bite people with no suspension, thats your opinion
thx for yr feed back as well
The sportscentre in toronto show the reply so many times to prove it wasn't a blown call and also the analyst in here like those ex-nhl players & ex-nhl gm discuss the bite after gm 1 and they all think it shouldn't be a suspension.
U know ppl in toronto re crazy about hockey and we actually don't cheer for the canucks even they re in canada. I bet on Boston gm 1 & gm 2 and want them to win too. But we play fair & square, boston lost not bcos of those reasons. They lost to a better team.
since when though do we or should we listen to the media. esp those on versus. if we follow their 'selections' all of us would be in the poorhouse following them. if torres or the hit bickell did on bieksa spinning his head around like linda blair in the exorcism did not get suspended then no way is the committee going to give burrows one -esp when there is no video evidence of it. end of story. there is no debate. that is the way it is. if we as viewers had any power at all- then we should sign a petition to oust bettman. since this has not occurred over the past decade or so- we become part of the problem not the solution. so we live with it. life goes on. bettmans still sits making shitloads of $ and burrows is playing. that is the way it is - anything else is just....
0
since when though do we or should we listen to the media. esp those on versus. if we follow their 'selections' all of us would be in the poorhouse following them. if torres or the hit bickell did on bieksa spinning his head around like linda blair in the exorcism did not get suspended then no way is the committee going to give burrows one -esp when there is no video evidence of it. end of story. there is no debate. that is the way it is. if we as viewers had any power at all- then we should sign a petition to oust bettman. since this has not occurred over the past decade or so- we become part of the problem not the solution. so we live with it. life goes on. bettmans still sits making shitloads of $ and burrows is playing. that is the way it is - anything else is just....
if you thought that him biting the finger of a player in the SCF warrants a suspension then you are dumb. in the regular season if this happened the max suspension would of been 1 game, does 1 regular season game = 1 SCF games, no. 1 SCF game = 4-5 regular season games or 3 at least IMO. so stop crying about him not being suspended.
So then we should just allow biting. No holds barred in the finals!!! woohoo great league that would be. Lets allow elbows to the head Matt Cooke style and Chris Pronger skate stomps because they arent suspended enough in the regular season so they should be permitted in the finals. Thats tremendous f'n logic.
0
Quote Originally Posted by komot:
if you thought that him biting the finger of a player in the SCF warrants a suspension then you are dumb. in the regular season if this happened the max suspension would of been 1 game, does 1 regular season game = 1 SCF games, no. 1 SCF game = 4-5 regular season games or 3 at least IMO. so stop crying about him not being suspended.
So then we should just allow biting. No holds barred in the finals!!! woohoo great league that would be. Lets allow elbows to the head Matt Cooke style and Chris Pronger skate stomps because they arent suspended enough in the regular season so they should be permitted in the finals. Thats tremendous f'n logic.
Burley do you really believe there was no video evidence of Burrows biting him? Are you that blind or that naive? Seriously. Didnt you watch the f'n tape? What other conclusion is there? I know you are a ridiculous homer but you make yourself look completely ignorant by saying there was no video evidence of it.
0
Burley do you really believe there was no video evidence of Burrows biting him? Are you that blind or that naive? Seriously. Didnt you watch the f'n tape? What other conclusion is there? I know you are a ridiculous homer but you make yourself look completely ignorant by saying there was no video evidence of it.
Burley do you really believe there was no video evidence of Burrows biting him? Are you that blind or that naive? Seriously. Didnt you watch the f'n tape? What other conclusion is there? I know you are a ridiculous homer but you make yourself look completely ignorant by saying there was no video evidence of it.
pot calling kettle black holy fuck
0
Quote Originally Posted by NJDevils:
Burley do you really believe there was no video evidence of Burrows biting him? Are you that blind or that naive? Seriously. Didnt you watch the f'n tape? What other conclusion is there? I know you are a ridiculous homer but you make yourself look completely ignorant by saying there was no video evidence of it.
Game 6 vs Tampa Bay - Horton squirts a fan in the face with a water
bottle leaving nearly everyone except Bruins fans and the league baffled
at how he can get away with this and not get a suspension. Next game,
Horton scores the game/series winning goal. Fast Forward to this series.
Same thing, except now its the Boston fans crying foul. Dont throw
rocks at glass houses Bruins fans!
0
Game 6 vs Tampa Bay - Horton squirts a fan in the face with a water
bottle leaving nearly everyone except Bruins fans and the league baffled
at how he can get away with this and not get a suspension. Next game,
Horton scores the game/series winning goal. Fast Forward to this series.
Same thing, except now its the Boston fans crying foul. Dont throw
rocks at glass houses Bruins fans!
Burley do you really believe there was no video evidence of Burrows biting him? Are you that blind or that naive? Seriously. Didnt you watch the f'n tape? What other conclusion is there? I know you are a ridiculous homer but you make yourself look completely ignorant by saying there was no video evidence of it.
that is what the league office said. all i saw was a tape of bergeron purposely sticking his finger in burrows mouth. beyond that u nor i can prove what happened after that. show me a video as proof u are the biggest effin crybaby on here and yes i remember u from the olys - you're a real 'debbie downer' all u posted was how brodeur did not get his starts in goal. u completely whined about that taking away alot of the joy we canadians had on this site. u r so anti nuck it makes me u complain about the 'offside' on kesler which it wasnt' u complain about burrows and no one has seen an actual biting video. now u that he was instrumental. u see the bruins dressing room. at least they have class. they accept that he wasn't suspended and they move on just like u should. when bieksa nearly had his head taken off by bickell did any of us start a thread on that like u would? no! if u don't like what is going on with the league. save ur typing to send them a letter instead of a forum like this.
0
Quote Originally Posted by NJDevils:
Burley do you really believe there was no video evidence of Burrows biting him? Are you that blind or that naive? Seriously. Didnt you watch the f'n tape? What other conclusion is there? I know you are a ridiculous homer but you make yourself look completely ignorant by saying there was no video evidence of it.
that is what the league office said. all i saw was a tape of bergeron purposely sticking his finger in burrows mouth. beyond that u nor i can prove what happened after that. show me a video as proof u are the biggest effin crybaby on here and yes i remember u from the olys - you're a real 'debbie downer' all u posted was how brodeur did not get his starts in goal. u completely whined about that taking away alot of the joy we canadians had on this site. u r so anti nuck it makes me u complain about the 'offside' on kesler which it wasnt' u complain about burrows and no one has seen an actual biting video. now u that he was instrumental. u see the bruins dressing room. at least they have class. they accept that he wasn't suspended and they move on just like u should. when bieksa nearly had his head taken off by bickell did any of us start a thread on that like u would? no! if u don't like what is going on with the league. save ur typing to send them a letter instead of a forum like this.
Who cares about video evidence, the player on Boston put his finger in the dudes mouth while they were fighting.. OF COURSE HE IS GONNA BITE HIM... ITS NOT LIKE HE RANDOMLY BIT HIM!
To call this a disgrace is a huge exaggeration, get it together NJDevils
0
Who cares about video evidence, the player on Boston put his finger in the dudes mouth while they were fighting.. OF COURSE HE IS GONNA BITE HIM... ITS NOT LIKE HE RANDOMLY BIT HIM!
To call this a disgrace is a huge exaggeration, get it together NJDevils
but this is the nhl, whenever bettman, campbell or murphy speak its all made up bs..it means nothing..basically what they wanted to say was this is the stanley cup playoffs, he isnt getting suspended for nibbling on a finger. if it was the regular season he gets 1 or 2 games.
0
i thought he bit him for sure
but this is the nhl, whenever bettman, campbell or murphy speak its all made up bs..it means nothing..basically what they wanted to say was this is the stanley cup playoffs, he isnt getting suspended for nibbling on a finger. if it was the regular season he gets 1 or 2 games.
I have a huge problem with the way the NHL handled this. Instead of having the balls to say yeah, he did bite, but it wasn't any injury intent. They just lied and think we will just walk in lockstep with them in believing he didn't bite.
If they said he did bite and there would be no suspension then shit would of hit the fan for the other biters that were suspended. So let's just say we didn't say anything and we cover our asses.
So yeah, what wiggins said, just more verbose.
0
I have a huge problem with the way the NHL handled this. Instead of having the balls to say yeah, he did bite, but it wasn't any injury intent. They just lied and think we will just walk in lockstep with them in believing he didn't bite.
If they said he did bite and there would be no suspension then shit would of hit the fan for the other biters that were suspended. So let's just say we didn't say anything and we cover our asses.
By continuosly bringing up this questionable biting incident, it makes it look like the only way the Bruins can win a game is if the Canucks are missing a player or two. The B's played a better game and were beaten by the better team. Why not focus on the next game because that is all that's important now. Bruins played a more physical game and almost won it. Game 3 should be great.
0
By continuosly bringing up this questionable biting incident, it makes it look like the only way the Bruins can win a game is if the Canucks are missing a player or two. The B's played a better game and were beaten by the better team. Why not focus on the next game because that is all that's important now. Bruins played a more physical game and almost won it. Game 3 should be great.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.