Just been trying to paper trade my way through, to arrive at some sort of correction. But last nights Rangers/Stars tilt is a prime example of why I might be in trouble this season. Capped it as a strong Under. Game played out as such until 3 period, 6 goal barrage in 3rd. That seems to be the new norm. Oh well, good day to review and look for some bankable angle lol.
"Goaltending is 90 percent of the game, unless you don't have it. Then it's 100 percent."-
1
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
The wacky sched continues.
Just been trying to paper trade my way through, to arrive at some sort of correction. But last nights Rangers/Stars tilt is a prime example of why I might be in trouble this season. Capped it as a strong Under. Game played out as such until 3 period, 6 goal barrage in 3rd. That seems to be the new norm. Oh well, good day to review and look for some bankable angle lol.
Hey Gain, 6 in the 3rd is a bad beat for sure but there's no way to cap that (That I know of anyway)! About the only thing that has seemed to be reliable is the Oilers Over and even that is no sure thing as most of their lines are set at 7 now. Be patient, we're not even quarter way through the season yet, the longer the season goes the stronger your numbers will get. Curious though, are you running a roster based model or team specific. Maybe an adjustment of the weights of past or present performance is needed?
I've notice that you tend to post early, generally before starting goalies are announced? Perhaps more consideration of that would get you a little closer ?
Hope you're well Brother and GET BACK ON THAT HORSE
(Yes I know it's a f*cking moose LOL)
Rust never sleeps
0
Hey Gain, 6 in the 3rd is a bad beat for sure but there's no way to cap that (That I know of anyway)! About the only thing that has seemed to be reliable is the Oilers Over and even that is no sure thing as most of their lines are set at 7 now. Be patient, we're not even quarter way through the season yet, the longer the season goes the stronger your numbers will get. Curious though, are you running a roster based model or team specific. Maybe an adjustment of the weights of past or present performance is needed?
I've notice that you tend to post early, generally before starting goalies are announced? Perhaps more consideration of that would get you a little closer ?
Hope you're well Brother and GET BACK ON THAT HORSE
Yeah 6 in a ton between any teams but ESP these 2... GF and GA in 3P for both would not constitute that kind of #s... it happens bro. Shake it off and onto the next!!
0
Yeah 6 in a ton between any teams but ESP these 2... GF and GA in 3P for both would not constitute that kind of #s... it happens bro. Shake it off and onto the next!!
My best angles for nhl so far are periods and TTs...esp periods... the #s haven't really lied so far this year... bos/Tb 1Pfell slightly into what I like so I played that.. #s didn't support a 2P and it ended 1-0 ... I only pregame 1Ps then in game the 2Ps I do..
oil / fla 1P was my biggest bet yest becuase it fell into my criteria just based on a few factors. I don't spend 30+ mins capping just 1 game anymore. 10 mins tops and I have what I'm playing whichever day
Anyway. BoL
0
My best angles for nhl so far are periods and TTs...esp periods... the #s haven't really lied so far this year... bos/Tb 1Pfell slightly into what I like so I played that.. #s didn't support a 2P and it ended 1-0 ... I only pregame 1Ps then in game the 2Ps I do..
oil / fla 1P was my biggest bet yest becuase it fell into my criteria just based on a few factors. I don't spend 30+ mins capping just 1 game anymore. 10 mins tops and I have what I'm playing whichever day
i've been grabbing live period over 1.5s with a team to score 1+ in the period as a SGP to get the juice to even money or better, its been decent just have to pick the right spots
not a savior
0
@nuggins
i've been grabbing live period over 1.5s with a team to score 1+ in the period as a SGP to get the juice to even money or better, its been decent just have to pick the right spots
6 in one period!!! How about 2 goals in the last 38 seconds in Smashville..Heard today that was only the 12th time that has happened since they began keeping stats in 1944. WTH
Those Who do not learn from History, are doomed to repeat it
1
6 in one period!!! How about 2 goals in the last 38 seconds in Smashville..Heard today that was only the 12th time that has happened since they began keeping stats in 1944. WTH
Wow - that is brutal Doc. Did not watch game, but seemed like you had a sure winner in almost every scenario except complete thermo-nuclear war... Which happened - 2 goals in last 45 seconds of game. that is unreal.
0
@GASportsDoc
Wow - that is brutal Doc. Did not watch game, but seemed like you had a sure winner in almost every scenario except complete thermo-nuclear war... Which happened - 2 goals in last 45 seconds of game. that is unreal.
1P in car/oil hits 8 out of 10 of my criteria so def a play even though goalies haven't been confirmed. Expect raanta for car and prob skinner. Def my main play.. expectinf heavy vig
Bos/ fla is 6 outta 10 so I'll stab.. same as tb/win
Just expected goalies to play. Doubtful when confirmed it will change my plays
Bola
0
1P in car/oil hits 8 out of 10 of my criteria so def a play even though goalies haven't been confirmed. Expect raanta for car and prob skinner. Def my main play.. expectinf heavy vig
Bos/ fla is 6 outta 10 so I'll stab.. same as tb/win
Just expected goalies to play. Doubtful when confirmed it will change my plays
Not applicable yet, but speaking on period over/unders at least last year for playoffs when a game total had a bet percentage of 72% + on the over, 1p un hit at a very very high clip. And 72% is just what I think I remember it being around, could be off some but on the first round I think I went somewhere like 9-3 on the games I took it on. Just a thought to memory bank for later
Train your mind to see the good in every situation! Chasing prop glory!
0
Not applicable yet, but speaking on period over/unders at least last year for playoffs when a game total had a bet percentage of 72% + on the over, 1p un hit at a very very high clip. And 72% is just what I think I remember it being around, could be off some but on the first round I think I went somewhere like 9-3 on the games I took it on. Just a thought to memory bank for later
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
