All Forums | Other

AFL Round 2

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 828
Posts: 48
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 2271
Posted: #26
Lakers and Heath win... Pies 2H lose but what a ending to a pretty average game. The Dees are going to try and run teams off their feet.

3-2 so far this weekend...

Saints Roos O169.5
Kane more DT points than Cox
Anthony more possies than Gram

Adding
Mark McVeigh more possessions than McPhee (This one was taken off the board after my bet unfortunately)
Delidio more DT points than Daniel Jackson

Not a cloud in the sky in Perth... should be great conditions.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 2271
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by HeadOverHeart:

Pies are complete shit.


Sometimes them is fightin' words but today... Yep.

Adding NBA Chicago -3... to make the finals, they need to win. The Bobcats will make the finals and won't have home advantage so I don't expect the same intenisty. I expect this to be -5.5 before gametime. If that O169.5 comes in, I'll play a little more on it.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 2271
Posted: #28
5-3 so far (even though two of those were at 1.65ish)


Mark McVeigh more possessions than McPhee
Delidio more DT points than Daniel Jackson


NBA 
Chicago -3
NOH -2.5

I think Adelaide will win and cover. I'll make the call tomorrow... but feel free to comment. I think it's an unpopular pick but with the ins, I think they will want the home win and have got key players back for this game. They look like they have a forward line now... just see if they have the legs.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 2271
Posted: #29

Cows update - van Berlo out, Young to debut

I also found out why the McPhee / McVeigh one was taken off... their was speculation regarding McPhee and Ballantyne... but expect both to play. McPhee's ankle was questionable.

I think the Cows will win by 20+. They have better players back and will not want to lose a home game.
Freo should lose but would the Bummers be able to have a functional forward line?
Doggies to win comfortably... but that line is too big for me to feel comfortable at the moment... especially at the G.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 2271
Posted: #30
Didn't pick the Nets to shoot 56%. Guess the NOH don't want to play anymore. NOH -2.5 



Suns 2H -6 and 2H O100... Suns down 24 at the half... can't see them losing this one by 18.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 2271
Posted: #31
Bogut is fucked

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ex2ryik9j9g
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 2271
Posted: #32
Chicago -3 
Suns 2H -6 
Suns 2H O100 


Double or nothing... Putting all my winnings from the weekend on Cows - 8.5

Swans only won 2 away games last year. Cows mids aren't in great condition but their back line will control the game. The key is the Swans backs... and I don't think they can control the Cows forwards and run.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 927
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by Hendy:

Bogut is fucked

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ex2ryik9j9g


shit, there goes our World Champs hopes...i was only reading this week that he wasn't a certain for the tournament, gone now.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1900
Posted: #34
Little close for comfort against the dees yesterday, same ol' pies huh

When are they going to learn to respect the lesser teams and play hard every game.

Eddy & Hendy


 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 871
Posted: #35
I took denver -12.5 2nd half and it won.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 2271
Posted: #36
Adelaide kicking efficiency 28%... WOW. Sydney by 17 (10.5 played in the 2nd).

I got the Denver 2H also... but didn't get a chance to post before. 


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 2271
Posted: #37
Cows 

Swans up by 41 before the half

Would anyone be brave enough for Cows 2H?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 927
Posted: #38
crows paying $14 to win
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 927
Posted: #39
live line 39.5

now that's tempeting +39.5 adelaide, 1unit for me

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 2271
Posted: #40
I am looking at Adelaide 2H... I see Sydney slowing things down and trying to hold onto the lead.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 2271
Posted: #41
Couldn't resist Adel 2H... +35.5
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 927
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by Hendy:

I am looking at Adelaide 2H... I see Sydney slowing things down and trying to hold onto the lead.


you'd like to think Adelaide could restrict Sydney's 1st half performance in the second. If Neil Craig has an idea of strategy he should be able to come up with some kind of plan to restrict the swans free running...or perhaps the crows are simply underdone  i.e @ west coast last sunday
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 927
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by SirGargamel:



you'd like to think Adelaide could restrict Sydney's 1st half performance in the second. If Neil Craig has an idea of strategy he should be able to come up with some kind of plan to restrict the swans free running...or perhaps the crows are simply underdone  i.e @ west coast last sunday


@ fremantle that should have read

sydney's mission is apparently to outscore adelaide in the 2nd half accordingly to Leigh Colbert...hmm

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 141
Posted: #44

Footscray v Tigers

 

Footscray to score 121+ @ 1,90

Footscray -44,5 @ 1,80

 

 

and congrats on the Adelaide - Sydney over 170,5 ;)

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 2271
Posted: #45
Got absolutely hammered on the Cows Swans game.

Lost my winnings plus another two... Cows +35.5 and Under 185.5.

Not smart money management... but I don't know who would have picked the Swans to win over 40 at AAMI.

FARK!

Adding
Doggies 1H -23.5

Outstanding 
McVeigh more possies than McPhee
Delidio more DT points than Jackson

FARK!


 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 927
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by Hendy:

Got absolutely hammered on the Cows Swans game.

Lost my winnings plus another two... Cows +35.5 and Under 185.5.

Not smart money management... but I don't know who would have picked the Swans to win over 40 at AAMI.

FARK!

Adding
Doggies 1H -23.5

Outstanding 
McVeigh more possies than McPhee
Delidio more DT points than Jackson

FARK!




yep, same boat
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 2271
Posted: #47
Last couple of games... Pies almost lose to Dess, Roos don't score in a Q at the dome, eGirls lose at home, Adelaide lose by 40 at home and Freo win for the first time in Melbourne for 3 years.

Full moon?

McVeigh more possies than McPhee 

Outstanding 
Doggies 1H -23.5
Delidio more DT points than Jackson
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2005
Posts: 2271
Posted: #48
Doggies 1H -23.5 

Only remaining is Dids and he's got the hard tag. Should be close. I'm back to even with Dids remaining.

Looking at Black Mumba tomorrow.
All Forums | Other
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.