The line has moved nearly 5 points towards the lions but I was gobsmacked to see it come out at a pick em. It would've been nice to get it then but I rarely take a bet before the teams come out.
With Fev, I don't think it'll come down to one player to stop him rather, like the crows did, drop a player across to limit his leads and contest with.
Don't get me wrong Carlton will be a very good team but in 2010. They have the most inexperienced team (on average 300 games less experience than the 15th most inexperienced team). I expect Carlton to be very good in the first quarter by like you said the pressure for 4 full quarters will be the difference and wear them down.
Good luck to us buddy.
With Fev, I don't think it'll come down to one player to stop him rather, like the crows did, drop a player across to limit his leads and contest with.
Don't get me wrong Carlton will be a very good team but in 2010. They have the most inexperienced team (on average 300 games less experience than the 15th most inexperienced team). I expect Carlton to be very good in the first quarter by like you said the pressure for 4 full quarters will be the difference and wear them down.
Good luck to us buddy.
I think Copeland just got omitted for better (defensive) players but Leuenberger? I initially thought cause it was going to be wet but its indoors so I guess its just to balance the side.
I'm just rapted Drummond is back, I think it was amazing to see how big of an impact he makes, or should I say (the opposite) how much of a hole he leaves when he's not there. It was obvious as soon as he was injured in the Collingwood match. They are a lot more organized in defence with him in.
Cheers guys
I think Copeland just got omitted for better (defensive) players but Leuenberger? I initially thought cause it was going to be wet but its indoors so I guess its just to balance the side.
I'm just rapted Drummond is back, I think it was amazing to see how big of an impact he makes, or should I say (the opposite) how much of a hole he leaves when he's not there. It was obvious as soon as he was injured in the Collingwood match. They are a lot more organized in defence with him in.
Cheers guys
I think Copeland just got omitted for better (defensive) players but Leuenberger? I initially thought cause it was going to be wet but its indoors so I guess its just to balance the side.
Thanks for that. I was very suprised to see him ommited but you made some good points. Lions in recent years have had lots of good tall players. I'm on Brisvegas.
I think Copeland just got omitted for better (defensive) players but Leuenberger? I initially thought cause it was going to be wet but its indoors so I guess its just to balance the side.
Thanks for that. I was very suprised to see him ommited but you made some good points. Lions in recent years have had lots of good tall players. I'm on Brisvegas.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.