@Bobbys_pregame
![]()
![]()
All the way where?
There is no reasonable person that knows anything about sports betting that will disagree long term winners are 5% or less Why would anything need to be corrupted just because the places to bet have been expanded? Show me empirical evidence of anything you ever claim I only contradict you because you are a conspiracy everywhere you look or think everything is predestined
There is no reasonable person that knows anything about sports betting that will disagree long term winners are 5% or less Why would anything need to be corrupted just because the places to bet have been expanded? Show me empirical evidence of anything you ever claim I only contradict you because you are a conspiracy everywhere you look or think everything is predestined
I am taking it in the spirit you intended Winner would simply be collecting more than you paid out, in whatever the time frame might be Long term I would say several years as anyone can get hot or even having a winning season or two
I am taking it in the spirit you intended Winner would simply be collecting more than you paid out, in whatever the time frame might be Long term I would say several years as anyone can get hot or even having a winning season or two
What exactly am I a moron about? Let me know and support your argument with facts, reasoning, logic etc. Also site the source of your facts
What exactly am I a moron about? Let me know and support your argument with facts, reasoning, logic etc. Also site the source of your facts
Pique....peak??? It's a gambling forum, what are you the grammar gestapo?
Pique....peak??? It's a gambling forum, what are you the grammar gestapo?
You're talking in pointless circles and making excuses. The empirical evidence is that it's obvious so many fantastic finishes per week can't happen unless artificially implemented.
Empirical evidence? You need to be actually intelligent. To think for yourself. I've given you 100 examples in 2 years. It's obviously not theory anymore
You're talking in pointless circles and making excuses. The empirical evidence is that it's obvious so many fantastic finishes per week can't happen unless artificially implemented.
Empirical evidence? You need to be actually intelligent. To think for yourself. I've given you 100 examples in 2 years. It's obviously not theory anymore
Support an argument? You haven't supported a single one of your beliefs. You've just relied on insults and group think. Your logic is- you can't figure out how it's done, so it can't be done. That's a belief. Not proof. Not evidence. You're your own religious cult
Support an argument? You haven't supported a single one of your beliefs. You've just relied on insults and group think. Your logic is- you can't figure out how it's done, so it can't be done. That's a belief. Not proof. Not evidence. You're your own religious cult
![]()
![]()
Projecting? That makes no sense in this context. You don't even know what you're saying. You're just making stuff up because you know it's late in the game and you're losing.
Projecting? That makes no sense in this context. You don't even know what you're saying. You're just making stuff up because you know it's late in the game and you're losing.
Theres a lot of parody in the league plain and simple. I dont know what makes people think watching grown men play a sport should be predictable.
Theres a lot of parody in the league plain and simple. I dont know what makes people think watching grown men play a sport should be predictable.
