CD Newsletter Week 12

@Hugh_Jorgan

Thankyou, proof reading not my strong suit. But being a Canuk, alot of your "Provinces"seem the same to me.

I will work on that.

This is buy low meets sell high

This game should be 3 and I would have unloaded on WFT at that number.

This line only being 1 scares the bejesus outta me

I believe that Lamar is a good person, not to mention a hell of a punt returner ... but it's not Lamar's balls that Ive been breaking

If Vea plays for TB on Sunday, the Bucs are going to spank the Colts

Haven't dabbled in hookey yet. Looks like you and Hughj made hay. You gotta post these before yishen.

This collaboration reminds me of a movie. I'm gonna have to post a vid.

Kirk Cousins has 21 tds and 2 int's.

Hugh, how many int worthy throws?

@Hugh_Jorgan

 "This is buy low meets sell high"

I believe that you were on Atlanta with the same premise no?

Just saying. 

The Pats feel like a runaway freight train to me, at the moment. No real big injuries. They are in pretty good shape for not having a bye yet.

So far 

Lions  +3.5  -113

Cowboys  -7  -105

Steelers  +5.5  -112

WFT  -109

Good Luck 

The Gang Who Couldn't Shoot Straight?

Dumb And Dumber?

-459

So far 

Lions  +3.5  -113

Cowboys  -7  -105

Steelers  +5.5  -112

WFT  -109

Vikings  +3.5  -113

Those stats are on PFF, which I'm not a subscriber. Someone on Twitter had posted the #'s, and now I can't find it.

As for "buy low sell high" ... As I've mentioned before, there is no method or theory which is 100%, nor 65% for that matter. The problem with the 'going against the grain' picks is that when they lose, those losses stick with a gambler much longer because that gambler gets into the emotional mindset of 'WTF was I thinking?!?!?!'. Those memories tend to make gamblers leery of feeling that emotional pain again. Whereas losing a game which is picked on stats alone (i.e. betting favorites) does not come with emotional pain because the gambler can tell himself 'well, I was on the right side, it was just bad luck' (similar to bigred with the Shrimp)

I've been high on NE and Mac Jones since before week 1, and I'm not sold on Tenn being a team who can go to the SB, but I will also default to the 'buy low sell high' theory. It makes money over the course of time. Recency bias is a gamblers worst enemy, I try to be on the other side of it

Good luck my Canadian brother

English Chump   Barnsley v Peterborough   2 45 Eastern time

      Barnsley -1   (2.38 Pinny)

Not going crazy on this one. (70%  stake)

Correction - Blackburn v Peterborough

Had Betty on my mind.

Blackburn -1        

This was done in '70 (I think) so this might be a futile exercise. This is still watchable IMO. Great cast with Clint leading the way.

Hughj has to be Kelly (Clint) and  Getty, Big Joe (Telly). As for the rest, up for interpretation. This ragtag unit reminds me of the Box. 

I would Imagine that we were the group of people that would watch a game together wearing the jerseys of football players that were murderers 

Cant upload the picture but it was pretty hilarious 

@lbcake

Great movie! I didn't recall Don Rickles being in the movie.

May have to watch this one again soon

So you're saying we'd all be wearing jerseys of former Shrimp players?

So far ...

Chi -3

Dal -6.5 (20), -7 (I am 6-1 on my large Dal bets. This is another one)

Ten +7 (15), ML

NYJ +3, ML

TB -3

Car -2 (I HATE betting on Cam)

Cin -4

SF -3

Rams P

WFT -1 (betting into this questionable line)

@Hugh_Jorgan

 Definitely SF -3, and I got Rams +1.

@lbcake