@Biscuiteater1 Sorry Bisc, not the game I grew up with. They were probably saying the same when the mound was a storey high and Bob Gibson was dealing.
This game in Milwaukee may end up being a slugfest...
This game in Milwaukee may end up being a slugfest...
This game in Milwaukee may end up being a slugfest...
So the O's lost the 10th game in a row, in the postseason, that's brutal.
Post-season failure and teams from Baltimore is apparently a thing
So the O's lost the 10th game in a row, in the postseason, that's brutal.
Post-season failure and teams from Baltimore is apparently a thing
12-12-3 (-0.39)
Props 0-3 (-3.70)
Shit, went 5-1 on straight plays last week. Had my panties in a bunch over the lost prop bet, still came out slightly up on the week. I was 2 c*nt hairs away from 6-0, Falcons has 2 non offensive td's.
Cardinals +7.5(-115) *1.00/.87
Saints +5(-108) *1.08/1.00
Saints ML(+190) *.30/.57
Jaguars-3(-103) *.75/.73
Bucs ML(+105) *.50/.53
Lots of guys out for the Bucs here, 5 starters.
But I think that the most important injury is for the Falcons in Center Drew Dalman. His replacement Ryan Neuzil is rough to say the least. Vita Vea should eat in this game with pressure up the middle.
Captain Kirk in night games is a mess. The Falcons offense sucks.
Half unit, it's TNF, and probably a bad idea to bet on anything. Hope the coin lands on the right side.
12-12-3 (-0.39)
Props 0-3 (-3.70)
Shit, went 5-1 on straight plays last week. Had my panties in a bunch over the lost prop bet, still came out slightly up on the week. I was 2 c*nt hairs away from 6-0, Falcons has 2 non offensive td's.
Cardinals +7.5(-115) *1.00/.87
Saints +5(-108) *1.08/1.00
Saints ML(+190) *.30/.57
Jaguars-3(-103) *.75/.73
Bucs ML(+105) *.50/.53
Lots of guys out for the Bucs here, 5 starters.
But I think that the most important injury is for the Falcons in Center Drew Dalman. His replacement Ryan Neuzil is rough to say the least. Vita Vea should eat in this game with pressure up the middle.
Captain Kirk in night games is a mess. The Falcons offense sucks.
Half unit, it's TNF, and probably a bad idea to bet on anything. Hope the coin lands on the right side.
@undermysac
That 12 - 12 ain't looking too bad. I kinda feel when it comes to Bucs/Atl who I trust more at QB. I don't think I'll play it though.
@undermysac
That 12 - 12 ain't looking too bad. I kinda feel when it comes to Bucs/Atl who I trust more at QB. I don't think I'll play it though.
All that I can say, is that the Bears couldn't of looked worse while winning.
The o line is still shit. They were sacked twice where a Rams db was flagged for holding, and if you ask me those penalties were bunk. The penalties extended drives that should of never been.
The Bears had only 2 good drives imo. The D did their thing(they are still very good), but I saw signs of them wearing out. The Rams had chunk runs, and Stafford did whatever he wanted in the middle of the field.
The Rams had more first downs, more yards, were better on 3rd down, won penalties 6 to 10, and won t.o.p. It's just one of those games where losing the turnover battle 0-2 did them in.
With the Panthers coming into town, no one, and I mean no one seems to be worried. As if the Bears are a fine oiled machine and should sleep walk to a W.
I see a Panthers o line that protects very well, vs a Bears D line that's nothing to write home about. Montez Sweat has been a no show all year. I never see him on any play. He is now nursing a sore ankle, popping up on the injury report.
Since Dalton took over, the Panthers are 8th in epa per play, and 5th in success rate. Andy Dalton is a vet, he knows what he's doing.
Although the Panthers defense isn't really good, and maybe it's a spot where the Bears get their offense going? Shit I wouldn't bet on that cause I haven't really seen it yet. Some good plays here n there, but those are blurred with dumpster fire type mistakes, penalties, and bad blocking.
The +4 is tempting me. Who are the Bears to lay 4 vs anyone?
The fan side of me will want them to win decisively, but I don't see that as reality right now.
All that I can say, is that the Bears couldn't of looked worse while winning.
The o line is still shit. They were sacked twice where a Rams db was flagged for holding, and if you ask me those penalties were bunk. The penalties extended drives that should of never been.
The Bears had only 2 good drives imo. The D did their thing(they are still very good), but I saw signs of them wearing out. The Rams had chunk runs, and Stafford did whatever he wanted in the middle of the field.
The Rams had more first downs, more yards, were better on 3rd down, won penalties 6 to 10, and won t.o.p. It's just one of those games where losing the turnover battle 0-2 did them in.
With the Panthers coming into town, no one, and I mean no one seems to be worried. As if the Bears are a fine oiled machine and should sleep walk to a W.
I see a Panthers o line that protects very well, vs a Bears D line that's nothing to write home about. Montez Sweat has been a no show all year. I never see him on any play. He is now nursing a sore ankle, popping up on the injury report.
Since Dalton took over, the Panthers are 8th in epa per play, and 5th in success rate. Andy Dalton is a vet, he knows what he's doing.
Although the Panthers defense isn't really good, and maybe it's a spot where the Bears get their offense going? Shit I wouldn't bet on that cause I haven't really seen it yet. Some good plays here n there, but those are blurred with dumpster fire type mistakes, penalties, and bad blocking.
The +4 is tempting me. Who are the Bears to lay 4 vs anyone?
The fan side of me will want them to win decisively, but I don't see that as reality right now.
Thursday Night :
Baker +1.5 ( 5u )
so what do you guys think bout this bet: Browns ML+150 + Bengals ML +122 + Jaguars -3 -105
If you are Bias about me betting On or Against your teams , please don't answer
Thursday Night :
Baker +1.5 ( 5u )
so what do you guys think bout this bet: Browns ML+150 + Bengals ML +122 + Jaguars -3 -105
If you are Bias about me betting On or Against your teams , please don't answer
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.